Cargando…

Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting

New algorithms are continuously proposed in computational biology. Performance evaluation of novel methods is important in practice. Nonetheless, the field experiences a lack of rigorous methodology aimed to systematically and objectively evaluate competing approaches. Simulation studies are frequen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaibub Neto, Elias, Bare, J. Christopher, Margolin, Adam A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107957
_version_ 1782338242029289472
author Chaibub Neto, Elias
Bare, J. Christopher
Margolin, Adam A.
author_facet Chaibub Neto, Elias
Bare, J. Christopher
Margolin, Adam A.
author_sort Chaibub Neto, Elias
collection PubMed
description New algorithms are continuously proposed in computational biology. Performance evaluation of novel methods is important in practice. Nonetheless, the field experiences a lack of rigorous methodology aimed to systematically and objectively evaluate competing approaches. Simulation studies are frequently used to show that a particular method outperforms another. Often times, however, simulation studies are not well designed, and it is hard to characterize the particular conditions under which different methods perform better. In this paper we propose the adoption of well established techniques in the design of computer and physical experiments for developing effective simulation studies. By following best practices in planning of experiments we are better able to understand the strengths and weaknesses of competing algorithms leading to more informed decisions about which method to use for a particular task. We illustrate the application of our proposed simulation framework with a detailed comparison of the ridge-regression, lasso and elastic-net algorithms in a large scale study investigating the effects on predictive performance of sample size, number of features, true model sparsity, signal-to-noise ratio, and feature correlation, in situations where the number of covariates is usually much larger than sample size. Analysis of data sets containing tens of thousands of features but only a few hundred samples is nowadays routine in computational biology, where “omics” features such as gene expression, copy number variation and sequence data are frequently used in the predictive modeling of complex phenotypes such as anticancer drug response. The penalized regression approaches investigated in this study are popular choices in this setting and our simulations corroborate well established results concerning the conditions under which each one of these methods is expected to perform best while providing several novel insights.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4188526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41885262014-10-10 Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting Chaibub Neto, Elias Bare, J. Christopher Margolin, Adam A. PLoS One Research Article New algorithms are continuously proposed in computational biology. Performance evaluation of novel methods is important in practice. Nonetheless, the field experiences a lack of rigorous methodology aimed to systematically and objectively evaluate competing approaches. Simulation studies are frequently used to show that a particular method outperforms another. Often times, however, simulation studies are not well designed, and it is hard to characterize the particular conditions under which different methods perform better. In this paper we propose the adoption of well established techniques in the design of computer and physical experiments for developing effective simulation studies. By following best practices in planning of experiments we are better able to understand the strengths and weaknesses of competing algorithms leading to more informed decisions about which method to use for a particular task. We illustrate the application of our proposed simulation framework with a detailed comparison of the ridge-regression, lasso and elastic-net algorithms in a large scale study investigating the effects on predictive performance of sample size, number of features, true model sparsity, signal-to-noise ratio, and feature correlation, in situations where the number of covariates is usually much larger than sample size. Analysis of data sets containing tens of thousands of features but only a few hundred samples is nowadays routine in computational biology, where “omics” features such as gene expression, copy number variation and sequence data are frequently used in the predictive modeling of complex phenotypes such as anticancer drug response. The penalized regression approaches investigated in this study are popular choices in this setting and our simulations corroborate well established results concerning the conditions under which each one of these methods is expected to perform best while providing several novel insights. Public Library of Science 2014-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4188526/ /pubmed/25289666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107957 Text en © 2014 Chaibub Neto et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chaibub Neto, Elias
Bare, J. Christopher
Margolin, Adam A.
Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting
title Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting
title_full Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting
title_fullStr Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting
title_full_unstemmed Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting
title_short Simulation Studies as Designed Experiments: The Comparison of Penalized Regression Models in the “Large p, Small n” Setting
title_sort simulation studies as designed experiments: the comparison of penalized regression models in the “large p, small n” setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107957
work_keys_str_mv AT chaibubnetoelias simulationstudiesasdesignedexperimentsthecomparisonofpenalizedregressionmodelsinthelargepsmallnsetting
AT barejchristopher simulationstudiesasdesignedexperimentsthecomparisonofpenalizedregressionmodelsinthelargepsmallnsetting
AT margolinadama simulationstudiesasdesignedexperimentsthecomparisonofpenalizedregressionmodelsinthelargepsmallnsetting