Cargando…

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT

INTRODUCTION: Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silverstein, Melvin J., Fastner, Gerd, Maluta, Sergio, Reitsamer, Roland, Goer, Donald A., Vicini, Frank, Wazer, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3998-6
_version_ 1782338293127446528
author Silverstein, Melvin J.
Fastner, Gerd
Maluta, Sergio
Reitsamer, Roland
Goer, Donald A.
Vicini, Frank
Wazer, David
author_facet Silverstein, Melvin J.
Fastner, Gerd
Maluta, Sergio
Reitsamer, Roland
Goer, Donald A.
Vicini, Frank
Wazer, David
author_sort Silverstein, Melvin J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were analyzed and used to determine which patients might be suitable for single-dose treatment. METHOD: The primary sources of data were the ELIOT Trial and TARGIT-A Trial, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the peer-reviewed literature of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using 50-kV X-rays or electrons. Studies published or presented prior to March 2014 were analyzed for efficacy, patient restrictions, complications, and outcome. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year recurrence rates for ELIOT versus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) patients were 4.4 % and 0.4 %, respectively, p = .0001. A low-risk ELIOT group was identified with a 5-year recurrence rate of 1.5 %. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the 5-year recurrence rates for the TARGIT-A versus EBRT patients were 3.3 % and 1.3 %, respectively, p = .042. CONCLUSION: With 5.8 years of median follow-up, IOERT appears to have a subset of low-risk women for whom IOERT is acceptable. With 29 months of median follow-up the results of IORT with 50-kV devices are promising, but longer follow-up data are required. At the current time, single-fraction IOERT or IORT patients should be treated under strict institutional protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4189005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41890052014-10-15 Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT Silverstein, Melvin J. Fastner, Gerd Maluta, Sergio Reitsamer, Roland Goer, Donald A. Vicini, Frank Wazer, David Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology INTRODUCTION: Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were analyzed and used to determine which patients might be suitable for single-dose treatment. METHOD: The primary sources of data were the ELIOT Trial and TARGIT-A Trial, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the peer-reviewed literature of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using 50-kV X-rays or electrons. Studies published or presented prior to March 2014 were analyzed for efficacy, patient restrictions, complications, and outcome. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year recurrence rates for ELIOT versus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) patients were 4.4 % and 0.4 %, respectively, p = .0001. A low-risk ELIOT group was identified with a 5-year recurrence rate of 1.5 %. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the 5-year recurrence rates for the TARGIT-A versus EBRT patients were 3.3 % and 1.3 %, respectively, p = .042. CONCLUSION: With 5.8 years of median follow-up, IOERT appears to have a subset of low-risk women for whom IOERT is acceptable. With 29 months of median follow-up the results of IORT with 50-kV devices are promising, but longer follow-up data are required. At the current time, single-fraction IOERT or IORT patients should be treated under strict institutional protocols. Springer US 2014-08-27 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4189005/ /pubmed/25160734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3998-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Silverstein, Melvin J.
Fastner, Gerd
Maluta, Sergio
Reitsamer, Roland
Goer, Donald A.
Vicini, Frank
Wazer, David
Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT
title Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT
title_full Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT
title_fullStr Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT
title_short Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT
title_sort intraoperative radiation therapy: a critical analysis of the eliot and targit trials. part 1—eliot
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3998-6
work_keys_str_mv AT silversteinmelvinj intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot
AT fastnergerd intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot
AT malutasergio intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot
AT reitsamerroland intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot
AT goerdonalda intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot
AT vicinifrank intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot
AT wazerdavid intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot