Cargando…
Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT
INTRODUCTION: Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3998-6 |
_version_ | 1782338293127446528 |
---|---|
author | Silverstein, Melvin J. Fastner, Gerd Maluta, Sergio Reitsamer, Roland Goer, Donald A. Vicini, Frank Wazer, David |
author_facet | Silverstein, Melvin J. Fastner, Gerd Maluta, Sergio Reitsamer, Roland Goer, Donald A. Vicini, Frank Wazer, David |
author_sort | Silverstein, Melvin J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were analyzed and used to determine which patients might be suitable for single-dose treatment. METHOD: The primary sources of data were the ELIOT Trial and TARGIT-A Trial, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the peer-reviewed literature of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using 50-kV X-rays or electrons. Studies published or presented prior to March 2014 were analyzed for efficacy, patient restrictions, complications, and outcome. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year recurrence rates for ELIOT versus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) patients were 4.4 % and 0.4 %, respectively, p = .0001. A low-risk ELIOT group was identified with a 5-year recurrence rate of 1.5 %. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the 5-year recurrence rates for the TARGIT-A versus EBRT patients were 3.3 % and 1.3 %, respectively, p = .042. CONCLUSION: With 5.8 years of median follow-up, IOERT appears to have a subset of low-risk women for whom IOERT is acceptable. With 29 months of median follow-up the results of IORT with 50-kV devices are promising, but longer follow-up data are required. At the current time, single-fraction IOERT or IORT patients should be treated under strict institutional protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4189005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41890052014-10-15 Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT Silverstein, Melvin J. Fastner, Gerd Maluta, Sergio Reitsamer, Roland Goer, Donald A. Vicini, Frank Wazer, David Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology INTRODUCTION: Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were analyzed and used to determine which patients might be suitable for single-dose treatment. METHOD: The primary sources of data were the ELIOT Trial and TARGIT-A Trial, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the peer-reviewed literature of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using 50-kV X-rays or electrons. Studies published or presented prior to March 2014 were analyzed for efficacy, patient restrictions, complications, and outcome. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year recurrence rates for ELIOT versus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) patients were 4.4 % and 0.4 %, respectively, p = .0001. A low-risk ELIOT group was identified with a 5-year recurrence rate of 1.5 %. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the 5-year recurrence rates for the TARGIT-A versus EBRT patients were 3.3 % and 1.3 %, respectively, p = .042. CONCLUSION: With 5.8 years of median follow-up, IOERT appears to have a subset of low-risk women for whom IOERT is acceptable. With 29 months of median follow-up the results of IORT with 50-kV devices are promising, but longer follow-up data are required. At the current time, single-fraction IOERT or IORT patients should be treated under strict institutional protocols. Springer US 2014-08-27 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4189005/ /pubmed/25160734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3998-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Silverstein, Melvin J. Fastner, Gerd Maluta, Sergio Reitsamer, Roland Goer, Donald A. Vicini, Frank Wazer, David Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT |
title | Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT |
title_full | Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT |
title_short | Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 1—ELIOT |
title_sort | intraoperative radiation therapy: a critical analysis of the eliot and targit trials. part 1—eliot |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3998-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silversteinmelvinj intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot AT fastnergerd intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot AT malutasergio intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot AT reitsamerroland intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot AT goerdonalda intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot AT vicinifrank intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot AT wazerdavid intraoperativeradiationtherapyacriticalanalysisoftheeliotandtargittrialspart1eliot |