Cargando…

Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Long-term ventilated intensive care patients frequently require tracheostomy. Although overall risks are low, serious immediate and late complications still arise. Real-time ultrasound guidance has been proposed to decrease complications and improve the accuracy of the tracheal punctur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudas, Máté, Seppelt, Ian, Herkes, Robert, Hislop, Robert, Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn, Weisbrodt, Leonie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0
_version_ 1782338322097504256
author Rudas, Máté
Seppelt, Ian
Herkes, Robert
Hislop, Robert
Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn
Weisbrodt, Leonie
author_facet Rudas, Máté
Seppelt, Ian
Herkes, Robert
Hislop, Robert
Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn
Weisbrodt, Leonie
author_sort Rudas, Máté
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Long-term ventilated intensive care patients frequently require tracheostomy. Although overall risks are low, serious immediate and late complications still arise. Real-time ultrasound guidance has been proposed to decrease complications and improve the accuracy of the tracheal puncture. We aimed to compare the procedural safety and efficacy of real-time ultrasound guidance with the traditional landmark approach during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). METHODS: A total of 50 patients undergoing PDT for clinical indications were randomly assigned, after obtaining informed consent, to have the tracheal puncture procedure carried out using either traditional anatomical landmarks or real-time ultrasound guidance. Puncture position was recorded via bronchoscopy. Blinded assessors determined in a standardised fashion the deviation of the puncture off midline and whether appropriate longitudinal position between the first and fourth tracheal rings was achieved. Procedural safety and efficacy data, including complications and number of puncture attempts required, were collected. RESULTS: In total, 47 data sets were evaluable. Real-time ultrasound guidance resulted in significantly more accurate tracheal puncture. Mean deviation from midline was 15 ± 3° versus 35 ± 5° (P = 0.001). The proportion of appropriate punctures, defined a priori as 0 ± 30° from midline, was significantly higher: 20 (87%) of 23 versus 12 (50%) of 24 (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.67; P = 0.006). First-pass success rate was 20 (87%) of 23 in the ultrasound group and 14 (58%) of 24 in the landmark group (RR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.17; P = 0.028). The observed decrease in procedural complications was not statistically significant: 5 (22%) of 23 in the ultrasound group versus 9 (37%) of 24 in the landmark group (RR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.23 to 1.47; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance significantly improved the rate of first-pass puncture and puncture accuracy. Fewer procedural complications were observed; however, this did not reach statistical significance. These results support wider general use of real-time ultrasound guidance as an additional tool to improve PDT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12611000237987 (registered 4 March 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4189189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41891892014-10-09 Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial Rudas, Máté Seppelt, Ian Herkes, Robert Hislop, Robert Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn Weisbrodt, Leonie Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Long-term ventilated intensive care patients frequently require tracheostomy. Although overall risks are low, serious immediate and late complications still arise. Real-time ultrasound guidance has been proposed to decrease complications and improve the accuracy of the tracheal puncture. We aimed to compare the procedural safety and efficacy of real-time ultrasound guidance with the traditional landmark approach during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). METHODS: A total of 50 patients undergoing PDT for clinical indications were randomly assigned, after obtaining informed consent, to have the tracheal puncture procedure carried out using either traditional anatomical landmarks or real-time ultrasound guidance. Puncture position was recorded via bronchoscopy. Blinded assessors determined in a standardised fashion the deviation of the puncture off midline and whether appropriate longitudinal position between the first and fourth tracheal rings was achieved. Procedural safety and efficacy data, including complications and number of puncture attempts required, were collected. RESULTS: In total, 47 data sets were evaluable. Real-time ultrasound guidance resulted in significantly more accurate tracheal puncture. Mean deviation from midline was 15 ± 3° versus 35 ± 5° (P = 0.001). The proportion of appropriate punctures, defined a priori as 0 ± 30° from midline, was significantly higher: 20 (87%) of 23 versus 12 (50%) of 24 (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.67; P = 0.006). First-pass success rate was 20 (87%) of 23 in the ultrasound group and 14 (58%) of 24 in the landmark group (RR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.17; P = 0.028). The observed decrease in procedural complications was not statistically significant: 5 (22%) of 23 in the ultrasound group versus 9 (37%) of 24 in the landmark group (RR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.23 to 1.47; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance significantly improved the rate of first-pass puncture and puncture accuracy. Fewer procedural complications were observed; however, this did not reach statistical significance. These results support wider general use of real-time ultrasound guidance as an additional tool to improve PDT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12611000237987 (registered 4 March 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-18 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4189189/ /pubmed/25231604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0 Text en © Rudas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rudas, Máté
Seppelt, Ian
Herkes, Robert
Hislop, Robert
Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn
Weisbrodt, Leonie
Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
title Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rudasmate traditionallandmarkversusultrasoundguidedtrachealpunctureduringpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinadultintensivecarepatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT seppeltian traditionallandmarkversusultrasoundguidedtrachealpunctureduringpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinadultintensivecarepatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT herkesrobert traditionallandmarkversusultrasoundguidedtrachealpunctureduringpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinadultintensivecarepatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hisloprobert traditionallandmarkversusultrasoundguidedtrachealpunctureduringpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinadultintensivecarepatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rajbhandaridorrilyn traditionallandmarkversusultrasoundguidedtrachealpunctureduringpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinadultintensivecarepatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weisbrodtleonie traditionallandmarkversusultrasoundguidedtrachealpunctureduringpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinadultintensivecarepatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial