Cargando…

Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology for a prospective, community-based study of sudden unexpected death in Wake County, North Carolina. METHODS: From 1 March to 29 June 2013, data of presumed cardiac arrest cases were captured from Wake County Emergency Medical Services. Participants we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nanavati, Parin P, Mounsey, John Paul, Pursell, Irion W, Simpson, Ross J, Lewis, Mary Elizabeth, Mehta, Neil D, Williams, Jefferson G, Bachman, Michael W, Myers, J Brent, Chung, Eugene H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000150
_version_ 1782338328741281792
author Nanavati, Parin P
Mounsey, John Paul
Pursell, Irion W
Simpson, Ross J
Lewis, Mary Elizabeth
Mehta, Neil D
Williams, Jefferson G
Bachman, Michael W
Myers, J Brent
Chung, Eugene H
author_facet Nanavati, Parin P
Mounsey, John Paul
Pursell, Irion W
Simpson, Ross J
Lewis, Mary Elizabeth
Mehta, Neil D
Williams, Jefferson G
Bachman, Michael W
Myers, J Brent
Chung, Eugene H
author_sort Nanavati, Parin P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology for a prospective, community-based study of sudden unexpected death in Wake County, North Carolina. METHODS: From 1 March to 29 June 2013, data of presumed cardiac arrest cases were captured from Wake County Emergency Medical Services. Participants were screened into the presumed sudden unexpected death group based on specific and sequential screening criteria, and medical and public records were collected for each participant in this group. A committee of independent cardiologists reviewed all data to determine final inclusion/exclusion of each participant into registry. RESULTS: We received 398 presumed cardiac arrest referrals. Of these, 105 participants, age 18–65 years old, were identified as presumed sudden unexpected deaths. The primary reason for exclusion was survival to hospital (38%). Ninety-five per cent of participants in the presumed sudden unexpected death group experienced an unwitnessed death. Hypertension was present in almost 50%, while dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were present in almost 25% of the same group. In addition, the presumed sudden unexpected death group includes 67.6% males (95% CI 58 to 76) whereas the control group only included 58.9% (95% CI 46 to 55) males. CONCLUSIONS: Participant identification and data collection processes identify presumed sudden unexpected death cases and secure medical and public data for screening and final adjudication. The study infrastructure developed in Wake County will allow its expansion to other counties in North Carolina. Preliminary data indicate the study presently focuses on a population demographically representative of North Carolina.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4189226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41892262014-10-20 Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results Nanavati, Parin P Mounsey, John Paul Pursell, Irion W Simpson, Ross J Lewis, Mary Elizabeth Mehta, Neil D Williams, Jefferson G Bachman, Michael W Myers, J Brent Chung, Eugene H Open Heart Arrhythmias and Sudden Death OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology for a prospective, community-based study of sudden unexpected death in Wake County, North Carolina. METHODS: From 1 March to 29 June 2013, data of presumed cardiac arrest cases were captured from Wake County Emergency Medical Services. Participants were screened into the presumed sudden unexpected death group based on specific and sequential screening criteria, and medical and public records were collected for each participant in this group. A committee of independent cardiologists reviewed all data to determine final inclusion/exclusion of each participant into registry. RESULTS: We received 398 presumed cardiac arrest referrals. Of these, 105 participants, age 18–65 years old, were identified as presumed sudden unexpected deaths. The primary reason for exclusion was survival to hospital (38%). Ninety-five per cent of participants in the presumed sudden unexpected death group experienced an unwitnessed death. Hypertension was present in almost 50%, while dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were present in almost 25% of the same group. In addition, the presumed sudden unexpected death group includes 67.6% males (95% CI 58 to 76) whereas the control group only included 58.9% (95% CI 46 to 55) males. CONCLUSIONS: Participant identification and data collection processes identify presumed sudden unexpected death cases and secure medical and public data for screening and final adjudication. The study infrastructure developed in Wake County will allow its expansion to other counties in North Carolina. Preliminary data indicate the study presently focuses on a population demographically representative of North Carolina. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4189226/ /pubmed/25332830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000150 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Arrhythmias and Sudden Death
Nanavati, Parin P
Mounsey, John Paul
Pursell, Irion W
Simpson, Ross J
Lewis, Mary Elizabeth
Mehta, Neil D
Williams, Jefferson G
Bachman, Michael W
Myers, J Brent
Chung, Eugene H
Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results
title Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results
title_full Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results
title_fullStr Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results
title_full_unstemmed Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results
title_short Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results
title_sort sudden unexpected death in north carolina (sudden): methodology review and screening results
topic Arrhythmias and Sudden Death
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000150
work_keys_str_mv AT nanavatiparinp suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT mounseyjohnpaul suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT pursellirionw suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT simpsonrossj suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT lewismaryelizabeth suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT mehtaneild suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT williamsjeffersong suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT bachmanmichaelw suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT myersjbrent suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults
AT chungeugeneh suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults