Cargando…
Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology for a prospective, community-based study of sudden unexpected death in Wake County, North Carolina. METHODS: From 1 March to 29 June 2013, data of presumed cardiac arrest cases were captured from Wake County Emergency Medical Services. Participants we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000150 |
_version_ | 1782338328741281792 |
---|---|
author | Nanavati, Parin P Mounsey, John Paul Pursell, Irion W Simpson, Ross J Lewis, Mary Elizabeth Mehta, Neil D Williams, Jefferson G Bachman, Michael W Myers, J Brent Chung, Eugene H |
author_facet | Nanavati, Parin P Mounsey, John Paul Pursell, Irion W Simpson, Ross J Lewis, Mary Elizabeth Mehta, Neil D Williams, Jefferson G Bachman, Michael W Myers, J Brent Chung, Eugene H |
author_sort | Nanavati, Parin P |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology for a prospective, community-based study of sudden unexpected death in Wake County, North Carolina. METHODS: From 1 March to 29 June 2013, data of presumed cardiac arrest cases were captured from Wake County Emergency Medical Services. Participants were screened into the presumed sudden unexpected death group based on specific and sequential screening criteria, and medical and public records were collected for each participant in this group. A committee of independent cardiologists reviewed all data to determine final inclusion/exclusion of each participant into registry. RESULTS: We received 398 presumed cardiac arrest referrals. Of these, 105 participants, age 18–65 years old, were identified as presumed sudden unexpected deaths. The primary reason for exclusion was survival to hospital (38%). Ninety-five per cent of participants in the presumed sudden unexpected death group experienced an unwitnessed death. Hypertension was present in almost 50%, while dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were present in almost 25% of the same group. In addition, the presumed sudden unexpected death group includes 67.6% males (95% CI 58 to 76) whereas the control group only included 58.9% (95% CI 46 to 55) males. CONCLUSIONS: Participant identification and data collection processes identify presumed sudden unexpected death cases and secure medical and public data for screening and final adjudication. The study infrastructure developed in Wake County will allow its expansion to other counties in North Carolina. Preliminary data indicate the study presently focuses on a population demographically representative of North Carolina. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4189226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41892262014-10-20 Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results Nanavati, Parin P Mounsey, John Paul Pursell, Irion W Simpson, Ross J Lewis, Mary Elizabeth Mehta, Neil D Williams, Jefferson G Bachman, Michael W Myers, J Brent Chung, Eugene H Open Heart Arrhythmias and Sudden Death OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology for a prospective, community-based study of sudden unexpected death in Wake County, North Carolina. METHODS: From 1 March to 29 June 2013, data of presumed cardiac arrest cases were captured from Wake County Emergency Medical Services. Participants were screened into the presumed sudden unexpected death group based on specific and sequential screening criteria, and medical and public records were collected for each participant in this group. A committee of independent cardiologists reviewed all data to determine final inclusion/exclusion of each participant into registry. RESULTS: We received 398 presumed cardiac arrest referrals. Of these, 105 participants, age 18–65 years old, were identified as presumed sudden unexpected deaths. The primary reason for exclusion was survival to hospital (38%). Ninety-five per cent of participants in the presumed sudden unexpected death group experienced an unwitnessed death. Hypertension was present in almost 50%, while dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were present in almost 25% of the same group. In addition, the presumed sudden unexpected death group includes 67.6% males (95% CI 58 to 76) whereas the control group only included 58.9% (95% CI 46 to 55) males. CONCLUSIONS: Participant identification and data collection processes identify presumed sudden unexpected death cases and secure medical and public data for screening and final adjudication. The study infrastructure developed in Wake County will allow its expansion to other counties in North Carolina. Preliminary data indicate the study presently focuses on a population demographically representative of North Carolina. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4189226/ /pubmed/25332830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000150 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Arrhythmias and Sudden Death Nanavati, Parin P Mounsey, John Paul Pursell, Irion W Simpson, Ross J Lewis, Mary Elizabeth Mehta, Neil D Williams, Jefferson G Bachman, Michael W Myers, J Brent Chung, Eugene H Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results |
title | Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results |
title_full | Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results |
title_fullStr | Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results |
title_full_unstemmed | Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results |
title_short | Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening results |
title_sort | sudden unexpected death in north carolina (sudden): methodology review and screening results |
topic | Arrhythmias and Sudden Death |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nanavatiparinp suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT mounseyjohnpaul suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT pursellirionw suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT simpsonrossj suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT lewismaryelizabeth suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT mehtaneild suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT williamsjeffersong suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT bachmanmichaelw suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT myersjbrent suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults AT chungeugeneh suddenunexpecteddeathinnorthcarolinasuddenmethodologyreviewandscreeningresults |