Cargando…

Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the treatment of upper/middle calyx kidney stones of 10–20 mm: a retrospective analysis of 174 patients

To compare the outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of upper or mid calyx kidney stones of 10 to 20 mm. A total of 174 patients with radioopaque solitary upper or mid calyx stones who underwent ESWL or F-URS with holmium:YA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Cecen, Kursat, Karadag, Mert Ali, Demir, Aslan, Bagcioglu, Murat, Kocaaslan, Ramazan, Sofikerim, Mustafa
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-557

Ejemplares similares

Erratum to: Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the treatment of upper/middle calyx kidney stones of 10–20 mm: a retrospective analysis of 174 patients
por: Cecen, Kursat, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Gastrointestinal Complications of Laparoscopic/Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgery and a Review of the Literature
por: Karadag, Mert Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The role of transcavitary ultrasonography in diagnosis and staging of nonmuscle-ınvasive bladder cancer: a prospective non-randomized clinical study
por: Oktem, Gultekin Cagri, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Small cell carcinoma of the prostate presenting with skin metastasis: a case report
por: Cecen, Kursat, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The course of metastatic prostate cancer under treatment
por: Demir, Aslan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Pain control using pethidine in combination with diazepam compared to diclofenac in combination with hyoscine-n-butyl bromide: in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
por: Demir, Aslan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Is there a difference between presence of single stone and multiple stones in flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stone burden <300mm(2)?
por: Ozgor, Faruk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?
por: Ferraro, Pietro Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones
por: Knoll, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Complementary Ureterorenoscopy after extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: success and complications
por: Demirelli, Erhan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cost-effectiveness of using stone cone, balloon dilator, stone basket, and entrapment device in ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones
por: Çeçen, Kürşat
Publicado: (2021)

Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy in flexible ureterorenoscopy
por: Lildal, Søren Kissow, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in the Treatment of 10–20 mm Lower Pole Stone: Prospective Non-randomized Study
por: Kezer, Cem
Publicado: (2022)

It Suddenly Occurred: Extensive Subcutaneous Emphysema after Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate
por: Bagcioglu, Murat, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy in children
por: Yeow, When-Chan, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Effectiveness of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi of 5–15 mm: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Fankhauser, Christian Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi
por: Fankhauser, Christian D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi
por: Fankhauser, Christian D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non–lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Bai, Song, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effectiveness of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for Multiple Unilateral Intrarenal Stones Smaller Than 2 cm
por: Alkan, Erdal, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Sheathless synchronous flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy in complete duplex renal collecting system with stones()
por: Aggarwal, Dharmender, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy with regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia: A prospective randomized study
por: Sahan, Murat, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy of Primary Intrahepatic Stones
por: Kim, Myung Hwan, et al.
Publicado: (1992)

Flexible ureterorenoscopy is associated with less stone recurrence rates over Shockwave lithotripsy in the management of 10-20 millimeter lower pole renal stone: medium follow-up results
por: Ozgor, Faruk, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Editorial Comment: Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤ 2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Danilovic, Alexandre
Publicado: (2022)

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20–30 mm single renal pelvic stone
por: Hassan, Mohammed, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Endometriosis presenting with right side hydroureteronephrosis only: a case report
por: Karadag, Mert Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol
por: McClinton, Sam, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predictive Factors of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
por: Choi, Ji Woong, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy for treating patients with bladder stones
por: Telha, Khaled A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Efficacy and safety of fURS in stones larger than 20 mm: is it still the threshold?
por: Karagöz, Mehmet Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effect of stone size on the results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of upper ureteric stones
por: El-Abd, Ahmed S., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of retrograde ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous anterograde ureteroscopy for removal of impacted upper ureteral stones >10mm in the elderly population
por: Gökce, Mehmet İlker, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
por: Sajid, Muhammad Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?
por: Turan, Turgay, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Urolithiasis in Children: Evaluation of the Use of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Lithotripsy
por: Garzi, A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide on kidney stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
por: Tehranchi, Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
por: Lim, Ki Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm
por: Yao, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm
por: Ito, Katsuhiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_4ejdfcdj7ufnkeeevg0r5kjprl