Cargando…

Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study

BACKGROUND: Graphic warning labels are a tobacco control best practice that is mandated in the US for cigarettes under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. However, smokeless tobacco products are not required to carry graphic warning labels, and as of September 2014, electroni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popova, Lucy, Ling, Pamela M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-997
_version_ 1782338475253563392
author Popova, Lucy
Ling, Pamela M
author_facet Popova, Lucy
Ling, Pamela M
author_sort Popova, Lucy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Graphic warning labels are a tobacco control best practice that is mandated in the US for cigarettes under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. However, smokeless tobacco products are not required to carry graphic warning labels, and as of September 2014, electronic cigarettes in the US carry no warning labels and are aggressively marketed, including with “reduced harm” or “FDA Approved” messages. METHODS: In this online experiment, 483 US adult non-users of tobacco were randomized to view print advertisements for moist snuff, snus, and e-cigarettes with either warning labels (current warning label, graphic warning label) or “endorsements” (a “lower risk” label proposed by a tobacco company, an “FDA Approved” label) or control (tobacco advertisement with no label, advertisement for a non-tobacco consumer products). Main outcome measures included changes in perceived harm, positive attitudes towards, openness to using, and interest in a free sample of moist snuff, snus, and e-cigarettes. RESULTS: The graphic warning label increased perceived harm of moist snuff and e-cigarettes. “Lower risk” and “FDA Approved” labels decreased perceived harm of moist snuff and snus respectively. Current warning label and graphic warning label significantly lowered positive attitudes towards e-cigarettes. In this sample of non-users of tobacco, 15% were interested in a free sample of alternative tobacco products (predominantly e-cigarettes). Proportion of participants interested in a free sample did not differ significantly across the conditions, but those interested in a free sample had significantly lower perceptions of harm of corresponding tobacco products. CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory agencies should not allow “lower risk” warning labels, which have similar effects to the “FDA Approved” label, which is prohibited, and should consider implementing graphic warning labels for smokeless tobacco products and e-cigarettes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4190284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41902842014-10-10 Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study Popova, Lucy Ling, Pamela M BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Graphic warning labels are a tobacco control best practice that is mandated in the US for cigarettes under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. However, smokeless tobacco products are not required to carry graphic warning labels, and as of September 2014, electronic cigarettes in the US carry no warning labels and are aggressively marketed, including with “reduced harm” or “FDA Approved” messages. METHODS: In this online experiment, 483 US adult non-users of tobacco were randomized to view print advertisements for moist snuff, snus, and e-cigarettes with either warning labels (current warning label, graphic warning label) or “endorsements” (a “lower risk” label proposed by a tobacco company, an “FDA Approved” label) or control (tobacco advertisement with no label, advertisement for a non-tobacco consumer products). Main outcome measures included changes in perceived harm, positive attitudes towards, openness to using, and interest in a free sample of moist snuff, snus, and e-cigarettes. RESULTS: The graphic warning label increased perceived harm of moist snuff and e-cigarettes. “Lower risk” and “FDA Approved” labels decreased perceived harm of moist snuff and snus respectively. Current warning label and graphic warning label significantly lowered positive attitudes towards e-cigarettes. In this sample of non-users of tobacco, 15% were interested in a free sample of alternative tobacco products (predominantly e-cigarettes). Proportion of participants interested in a free sample did not differ significantly across the conditions, but those interested in a free sample had significantly lower perceptions of harm of corresponding tobacco products. CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory agencies should not allow “lower risk” warning labels, which have similar effects to the “FDA Approved” label, which is prohibited, and should consider implementing graphic warning labels for smokeless tobacco products and e-cigarettes. BioMed Central 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4190284/ /pubmed/25253295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-997 Text en © Popova and Ling; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Popova, Lucy
Ling, Pamela M
Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
title Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
title_full Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
title_fullStr Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
title_short Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
title_sort nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-997
work_keys_str_mv AT popovalucy nonsmokersresponsestonewwarninglabelsonsmokelesstobaccoandelectroniccigarettesanexperimentalstudy
AT lingpamelam nonsmokersresponsestonewwarninglabelsonsmokelesstobaccoandelectroniccigarettesanexperimentalstudy