Cargando…

Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies

BACKGROUND: The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) is a new epidemiological instrument for detection and treatment of dental caries. Worldwide, the WHO criterion constitutes the epidemiological tool most commonly used for caries detection. The objective of the present study is to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Souza, Ana Luiza, Leal, Soraya Coelho, Bronkhorst, Ewald M, Frencken, Jo E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-119
_version_ 1782338496949649408
author de Souza, Ana Luiza
Leal, Soraya Coelho
Bronkhorst, Ewald M
Frencken, Jo E
author_facet de Souza, Ana Luiza
Leal, Soraya Coelho
Bronkhorst, Ewald M
Frencken, Jo E
author_sort de Souza, Ana Luiza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) is a new epidemiological instrument for detection and treatment of dental caries. Worldwide, the WHO criterion constitutes the epidemiological tool most commonly used for caries detection. The objective of the present study is to determine the levels of similarity and difference between the CAST instrument and WHO criterion on the basis of caries prevalence, dmf/DMF counts, examination time and reporting of results. METHODS: An epidemiological survey was carried out in Brazil among 6-11-year-old schoolchildren. Time of examinations was recorded. dmft, dmfs, DMFT and DMFS counts and dental caries prevalence were obtained according to the WHO criterion and the CAST instrument, as well the correlation coefficient between the two instruments. RESULTS: Four hundred nineteen children were examined. dmft and dmfs counts were 1.92 and 5.31 (CAST), 1.99 and 5.34 (WHO) with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. DMFT and DMFS counts were 0.20 and 0.33 (CAST), 0.19 and 0.30 (WHO), with r = 0.78 and r =0.72, respectively. Kappa coefficient values for intra-examiner consistency were CAST = 0.91-0.92; WHO = 0.95-0.96 and those for inter-examiner consistency were CAST = 0.90-0.96; WHO = 0.94-1.00. Mean time spent on applying CAST and WHO were 66.3 and 64.7 sec, respectively p = 0.26. The prevalence of dental caries using CAST (codes 2, 5-8) and the WHO criterion for the primary dentition were 63.0% and 65.9%, respectively, and for the permanent dentition they were 12.7% and 12.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CAST instrument provided similar prevalence of dental caries values and dmf/DMF counts as the WHO criterion in this age group. Time spent on examining children was identical for both caries assessment methods. Presentation of results from use of the CAST instrument, in comparison to WHO criterion, allowed a more detailed reporting of stages of dental caries, which will be useful for oral health planners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4190376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41903762014-10-10 Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies de Souza, Ana Luiza Leal, Soraya Coelho Bronkhorst, Ewald M Frencken, Jo E BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) is a new epidemiological instrument for detection and treatment of dental caries. Worldwide, the WHO criterion constitutes the epidemiological tool most commonly used for caries detection. The objective of the present study is to determine the levels of similarity and difference between the CAST instrument and WHO criterion on the basis of caries prevalence, dmf/DMF counts, examination time and reporting of results. METHODS: An epidemiological survey was carried out in Brazil among 6-11-year-old schoolchildren. Time of examinations was recorded. dmft, dmfs, DMFT and DMFS counts and dental caries prevalence were obtained according to the WHO criterion and the CAST instrument, as well the correlation coefficient between the two instruments. RESULTS: Four hundred nineteen children were examined. dmft and dmfs counts were 1.92 and 5.31 (CAST), 1.99 and 5.34 (WHO) with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. DMFT and DMFS counts were 0.20 and 0.33 (CAST), 0.19 and 0.30 (WHO), with r = 0.78 and r =0.72, respectively. Kappa coefficient values for intra-examiner consistency were CAST = 0.91-0.92; WHO = 0.95-0.96 and those for inter-examiner consistency were CAST = 0.90-0.96; WHO = 0.94-1.00. Mean time spent on applying CAST and WHO were 66.3 and 64.7 sec, respectively p = 0.26. The prevalence of dental caries using CAST (codes 2, 5-8) and the WHO criterion for the primary dentition were 63.0% and 65.9%, respectively, and for the permanent dentition they were 12.7% and 12.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CAST instrument provided similar prevalence of dental caries values and dmf/DMF counts as the WHO criterion in this age group. Time spent on examining children was identical for both caries assessment methods. Presentation of results from use of the CAST instrument, in comparison to WHO criterion, allowed a more detailed reporting of stages of dental caries, which will be useful for oral health planners. BioMed Central 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4190376/ /pubmed/25260972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-119 Text en © de Souza et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Souza, Ana Luiza
Leal, Soraya Coelho
Bronkhorst, Ewald M
Frencken, Jo E
Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies
title Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies
title_full Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies
title_fullStr Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies
title_full_unstemmed Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies
title_short Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies
title_sort assessing caries status according to the cast instrument and who criterion in epidemiological studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-119
work_keys_str_mv AT desouzaanaluiza assessingcariesstatusaccordingtothecastinstrumentandwhocriterioninepidemiologicalstudies
AT lealsorayacoelho assessingcariesstatusaccordingtothecastinstrumentandwhocriterioninepidemiologicalstudies
AT bronkhorstewaldm assessingcariesstatusaccordingtothecastinstrumentandwhocriterioninepidemiologicalstudies
AT frenckenjoe assessingcariesstatusaccordingtothecastinstrumentandwhocriterioninepidemiologicalstudies