Cargando…

A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Miniarc Precise® single-incision sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) placed at the time of a robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a single-incision su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botros, Carolyn, Lewis, Christa, Culligan, Patrick, Salamon, Charbel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2432-8
_version_ 1782338515300777984
author Botros, Carolyn
Lewis, Christa
Culligan, Patrick
Salamon, Charbel
author_facet Botros, Carolyn
Lewis, Christa
Culligan, Patrick
Salamon, Charbel
author_sort Botros, Carolyn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Miniarc Precise® single-incision sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) placed at the time of a robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a single-incision suburethral sling placed at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse. Primary outcome measure was cure at 1 year, defined objectively by a negative cough stress test (CST) and subjectively by a score of “0 or 1” on question 17 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20): “Do you experience urine leakage related to coughing/sneezing/laughing?” Secondary outcome measures included the change in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7) scores at 1 year. All sling-related complications were reported. Paired Student’s t test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included between August 2010 and July 2012. One-year follow-up was available for 97 out of 101 patients (96 %). Objective cure was 90 % and subjective cure was 87 %. Baseline UDI-6 scores improved from 34.8 ± 25.1 to 6.7 ± 11.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). Similarly, UIQ-7 scores improved from 21.1 ± 22.8 to 2.4 ± 8.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). There were no intraoperative cystotomies, no mesh erosions, no sling revisions, and no cases of urinary retention. The retreatment rate for persistent SUI was 8 % (8 out of 97). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a single-incision suburethral sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with SUI resulted in an 87 % cure rate at 1 year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4190456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41904562014-10-15 A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy Botros, Carolyn Lewis, Christa Culligan, Patrick Salamon, Charbel Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Miniarc Precise® single-incision sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) placed at the time of a robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a single-incision suburethral sling placed at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse. Primary outcome measure was cure at 1 year, defined objectively by a negative cough stress test (CST) and subjectively by a score of “0 or 1” on question 17 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20): “Do you experience urine leakage related to coughing/sneezing/laughing?” Secondary outcome measures included the change in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7) scores at 1 year. All sling-related complications were reported. Paired Student’s t test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included between August 2010 and July 2012. One-year follow-up was available for 97 out of 101 patients (96 %). Objective cure was 90 % and subjective cure was 87 %. Baseline UDI-6 scores improved from 34.8 ± 25.1 to 6.7 ± 11.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). Similarly, UIQ-7 scores improved from 21.1 ± 22.8 to 2.4 ± 8.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). There were no intraoperative cystotomies, no mesh erosions, no sling revisions, and no cases of urinary retention. The retreatment rate for persistent SUI was 8 % (8 out of 97). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a single-incision suburethral sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with SUI resulted in an 87 % cure rate at 1 year. Springer London 2014-06-04 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4190456/ /pubmed/24894202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2432-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Botros, Carolyn
Lewis, Christa
Culligan, Patrick
Salamon, Charbel
A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
title A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
title_full A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
title_fullStr A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
title_short A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
title_sort prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2432-8
work_keys_str_mv AT botroscarolyn aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy
AT lewischrista aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy
AT culliganpatrick aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy
AT salamoncharbel aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy
AT botroscarolyn prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy
AT lewischrista prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy
AT culliganpatrick prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy
AT salamoncharbel prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy