Cargando…
A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Miniarc Precise® single-incision sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) placed at the time of a robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a single-incision su...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2432-8 |
_version_ | 1782338515300777984 |
---|---|
author | Botros, Carolyn Lewis, Christa Culligan, Patrick Salamon, Charbel |
author_facet | Botros, Carolyn Lewis, Christa Culligan, Patrick Salamon, Charbel |
author_sort | Botros, Carolyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Miniarc Precise® single-incision sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) placed at the time of a robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a single-incision suburethral sling placed at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse. Primary outcome measure was cure at 1 year, defined objectively by a negative cough stress test (CST) and subjectively by a score of “0 or 1” on question 17 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20): “Do you experience urine leakage related to coughing/sneezing/laughing?” Secondary outcome measures included the change in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7) scores at 1 year. All sling-related complications were reported. Paired Student’s t test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included between August 2010 and July 2012. One-year follow-up was available for 97 out of 101 patients (96 %). Objective cure was 90 % and subjective cure was 87 %. Baseline UDI-6 scores improved from 34.8 ± 25.1 to 6.7 ± 11.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). Similarly, UIQ-7 scores improved from 21.1 ± 22.8 to 2.4 ± 8.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). There were no intraoperative cystotomies, no mesh erosions, no sling revisions, and no cases of urinary retention. The retreatment rate for persistent SUI was 8 % (8 out of 97). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a single-incision suburethral sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with SUI resulted in an 87 % cure rate at 1 year. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4190456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41904562014-10-15 A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy Botros, Carolyn Lewis, Christa Culligan, Patrick Salamon, Charbel Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Miniarc Precise® single-incision sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) placed at the time of a robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a single-incision suburethral sling placed at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse. Primary outcome measure was cure at 1 year, defined objectively by a negative cough stress test (CST) and subjectively by a score of “0 or 1” on question 17 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20): “Do you experience urine leakage related to coughing/sneezing/laughing?” Secondary outcome measures included the change in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7) scores at 1 year. All sling-related complications were reported. Paired Student’s t test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included between August 2010 and July 2012. One-year follow-up was available for 97 out of 101 patients (96 %). Objective cure was 90 % and subjective cure was 87 %. Baseline UDI-6 scores improved from 34.8 ± 25.1 to 6.7 ± 11.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). Similarly, UIQ-7 scores improved from 21.1 ± 22.8 to 2.4 ± 8.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). There were no intraoperative cystotomies, no mesh erosions, no sling revisions, and no cases of urinary retention. The retreatment rate for persistent SUI was 8 % (8 out of 97). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a single-incision suburethral sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with SUI resulted in an 87 % cure rate at 1 year. Springer London 2014-06-04 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4190456/ /pubmed/24894202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2432-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Botros, Carolyn Lewis, Christa Culligan, Patrick Salamon, Charbel A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy |
title | A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy |
title_full | A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy |
title_fullStr | A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy |
title_short | A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy |
title_sort | prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2432-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT botroscarolyn aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy AT lewischrista aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy AT culliganpatrick aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy AT salamoncharbel aprospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy AT botroscarolyn prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy AT lewischrista prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy AT culliganpatrick prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy AT salamoncharbel prospectivestudyofasingleincisionslingatthetimeofroboticsacrocolpopexy |