Cargando…
The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation
BACKGROUND: The systematic involvement of project beneficiaries in community maternal and child health programmes remains low and limited, especially during the formative stages of the project cycle. Understanding how positive and negative feedbacks obtained from communities can subsequently be used...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0137-5 |
_version_ | 1782338516460503040 |
---|---|
author | Gilmore, Brynne Vallières, Frédérique McAuliffe, Eilish Tumwesigye, Nazarius Mbona Muyambi, Gilbert |
author_facet | Gilmore, Brynne Vallières, Frédérique McAuliffe, Eilish Tumwesigye, Nazarius Mbona Muyambi, Gilbert |
author_sort | Gilmore, Brynne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The systematic involvement of project beneficiaries in community maternal and child health programmes remains low and limited, especially during the formative stages of the project cycle. Understanding how positive and negative feedbacks obtained from communities can subsequently be used to inform and iterate existing programmes is an important step towards ensuring the success of community health workers for maternal and child health programming and, ultimately, for improving health outcomes. METHODS: The study took place over a period of 4 weeks in North Rukiga, Kabale District of southwestern Uganda. Using a cross-sectional qualitative study that employed an epistemological approach of phenomenology, nine focus group discussions and eight in-depth interviews were conducted with a total of 76 female participants across six different sites. Women were identified as either users or non-users of the maternal and child health programme. Purposeful sampling was employed to recruit women from six different locations within the programme catchment area. Translated and transcribed transcripts were subjected to a bottom-up thematic analysis using NVivo 10 Software, whereby themes were arrived at inductively. RESULTS: Predominant themes emerging from the focus groups and key informant interviews identified early trends in programme strengths. Beneficiaries reported confidence in both the programme and the relationships they had forged with community health workers, exhibited pride in the knowledge they had received, and described improved spousal involvement. Beneficiaries also identified a number of programme challenges including barriers to adopting the behaviours promoted by the programme, and highlighted issues with programme dependency and perceived ownership. It also emerged that community health workers were not reaching the entire population of intended programme beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides support for the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation of beneficiaries’ perceptions of newly initiated health programmes. Our results support how evaluations conducted in the early phases of programme implementation can provide valuable, timely feedback as well as yield recommendations for programme adjustment or re-alignment, and in turn, better meet end-user expectations. Potential reasons for the observed lack of community participation in early stages of programme implementation are considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4190461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41904612014-10-10 The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation Gilmore, Brynne Vallières, Frédérique McAuliffe, Eilish Tumwesigye, Nazarius Mbona Muyambi, Gilbert Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: The systematic involvement of project beneficiaries in community maternal and child health programmes remains low and limited, especially during the formative stages of the project cycle. Understanding how positive and negative feedbacks obtained from communities can subsequently be used to inform and iterate existing programmes is an important step towards ensuring the success of community health workers for maternal and child health programming and, ultimately, for improving health outcomes. METHODS: The study took place over a period of 4 weeks in North Rukiga, Kabale District of southwestern Uganda. Using a cross-sectional qualitative study that employed an epistemological approach of phenomenology, nine focus group discussions and eight in-depth interviews were conducted with a total of 76 female participants across six different sites. Women were identified as either users or non-users of the maternal and child health programme. Purposeful sampling was employed to recruit women from six different locations within the programme catchment area. Translated and transcribed transcripts were subjected to a bottom-up thematic analysis using NVivo 10 Software, whereby themes were arrived at inductively. RESULTS: Predominant themes emerging from the focus groups and key informant interviews identified early trends in programme strengths. Beneficiaries reported confidence in both the programme and the relationships they had forged with community health workers, exhibited pride in the knowledge they had received, and described improved spousal involvement. Beneficiaries also identified a number of programme challenges including barriers to adopting the behaviours promoted by the programme, and highlighted issues with programme dependency and perceived ownership. It also emerged that community health workers were not reaching the entire population of intended programme beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides support for the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation of beneficiaries’ perceptions of newly initiated health programmes. Our results support how evaluations conducted in the early phases of programme implementation can provide valuable, timely feedback as well as yield recommendations for programme adjustment or re-alignment, and in turn, better meet end-user expectations. Potential reasons for the observed lack of community participation in early stages of programme implementation are considered. BioMed Central 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4190461/ /pubmed/25253191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0137-5 Text en © Gilmore et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gilmore, Brynne Vallières, Frédérique McAuliffe, Eilish Tumwesigye, Nazarius Mbona Muyambi, Gilbert The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation |
title | The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation |
title_full | The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation |
title_fullStr | The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation |
title_short | The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation |
title_sort | last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0137-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilmorebrynne thelastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT vallieresfrederique thelastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT mcauliffeeilish thelastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT tumwesigyenazariusmbona thelastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT muyambigilbert thelastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT gilmorebrynne lastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT vallieresfrederique lastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT mcauliffeeilish lastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT tumwesigyenazariusmbona lastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation AT muyambigilbert lastoneheardtheimportanceofanearlystageparticipatoryevaluationforprogrammeimplementation |