Cargando…

Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Elevated maternal triglycerides have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including an increased risk of preeclampsia and macrosomia. A valid triglyceride meter would allow the examination of maternal postprandial triglycerides in a systematic manner. A non-fasting venous and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrett, Helen L, Dekker Nitert, Marloes, D’Emden, Michael, David McIntyre, H, Callaway, Leonie K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-679
_version_ 1782338522881982464
author Barrett, Helen L
Dekker Nitert, Marloes
D’Emden, Michael
David McIntyre, H
Callaway, Leonie K
author_facet Barrett, Helen L
Dekker Nitert, Marloes
D’Emden, Michael
David McIntyre, H
Callaway, Leonie K
author_sort Barrett, Helen L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Elevated maternal triglycerides have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including an increased risk of preeclampsia and macrosomia. A valid triglyceride meter would allow the examination of maternal postprandial triglycerides in a systematic manner. A non-fasting venous and two capillary measurements (using the Roche Accutrend® Plus meter) of triglycerides were measured in 40 participants at a mean of 36 weeks gestation. FINDINGS: The two methods were highly correlated (r = 0.89, P <0.0001), and the distributions were similar (mean difference 0.01 mmol/L (SD 0.47)), t = 0.18, P =0.86). Passing Bablok equation was: y = −0.01 + 0.98 × [95% CI intercept −0.51 – 0. 38; 95% CI slope 0.85-1.15). The estimated bias was −0.01 mmol/L (95% CI −0.93 – 0.91)). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the Accutrend® Plus meter provides results that correlate strongly with the reference method, with low bias, when used in late pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4190491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41904912014-10-10 Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy Barrett, Helen L Dekker Nitert, Marloes D’Emden, Michael David McIntyre, H Callaway, Leonie K BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Elevated maternal triglycerides have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including an increased risk of preeclampsia and macrosomia. A valid triglyceride meter would allow the examination of maternal postprandial triglycerides in a systematic manner. A non-fasting venous and two capillary measurements (using the Roche Accutrend® Plus meter) of triglycerides were measured in 40 participants at a mean of 36 weeks gestation. FINDINGS: The two methods were highly correlated (r = 0.89, P <0.0001), and the distributions were similar (mean difference 0.01 mmol/L (SD 0.47)), t = 0.18, P =0.86). Passing Bablok equation was: y = −0.01 + 0.98 × [95% CI intercept −0.51 – 0. 38; 95% CI slope 0.85-1.15). The estimated bias was −0.01 mmol/L (95% CI −0.93 – 0.91)). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the Accutrend® Plus meter provides results that correlate strongly with the reference method, with low bias, when used in late pregnancy. BioMed Central 2014-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4190491/ /pubmed/25264288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-679 Text en © Barrett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Barrett, Helen L
Dekker Nitert, Marloes
D’Emden, Michael
David McIntyre, H
Callaway, Leonie K
Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy
title Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy
title_full Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy
title_fullStr Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy
title_short Validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy
title_sort validation of a triglyceride meter for use in pregnancy
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-679
work_keys_str_mv AT barretthelenl validationofatriglyceridemeterforuseinpregnancy
AT dekkernitertmarloes validationofatriglyceridemeterforuseinpregnancy
AT demdenmichael validationofatriglyceridemeterforuseinpregnancy
AT davidmcintyreh validationofatriglyceridemeterforuseinpregnancy
AT callawayleoniek validationofatriglyceridemeterforuseinpregnancy