Cargando…

U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION. Left atrial catheter ablation is useful as symptomatic treatment in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Evaluation requires measurement of arrhythmia-related symptoms. Many of the published protocols have drawbacks and have been used in AF only, with no possible comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Höglund, Niklas, Rönn, Folke, Tollefsen, Titti, Jensen, Steen m., Kesek, Milos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24102147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.821190
_version_ 1782338560986185728
author Höglund, Niklas
Rönn, Folke
Tollefsen, Titti
Jensen, Steen m.
Kesek, Milos
author_facet Höglund, Niklas
Rönn, Folke
Tollefsen, Titti
Jensen, Steen m.
Kesek, Milos
author_sort Höglund, Niklas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION. Left atrial catheter ablation is useful as symptomatic treatment in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Evaluation requires measurement of arrhythmia-related symptoms. Many of the published protocols have drawbacks and have been used in AF only, with no possible comparison to other ablations that compete for the same resources. U22 is a published protocol that quantifies paroxysmal tachycardia symptoms through scales with 11 answer alternatives, translated into discrete numerical scales 0–10. It has been shown to reflect the clinical improvement after ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Here we report the use of U22 in measuring improvement after catheter ablation for AF. Material and methods. A total of 105 patients underwent first-time ablation for AF and answered U22 and SF-36 forms at baseline and follow-up 304 (SD 121) days after ablation. Independently, the patients underwent a clinical follow-up. All decisions regarding medication and reablation were taken without knowledge of the symptom scores. Results. The U22 scores for well-being, arrhythmia as cause for impaired well-being, derived time-aspect score for arrhythmia, and discomfort during attack detected relevant improvements of symptoms after the ablation. U22 showed larger improvement in patients undergoing only one procedure than in patients who later underwent repeated interventions, thus reflecting the independent clinical decision for reablation. Conclusion.U22 quantifies the symptomatic improvement after AF ablation with adequate internal consistency and construct validity. U22 mirrors aspects of the arrhythmia symptomatology other than SF-36.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4190885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41908852014-10-24 U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation Höglund, Niklas Rönn, Folke Tollefsen, Titti Jensen, Steen m. Kesek, Milos Ups J Med Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION. Left atrial catheter ablation is useful as symptomatic treatment in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Evaluation requires measurement of arrhythmia-related symptoms. Many of the published protocols have drawbacks and have been used in AF only, with no possible comparison to other ablations that compete for the same resources. U22 is a published protocol that quantifies paroxysmal tachycardia symptoms through scales with 11 answer alternatives, translated into discrete numerical scales 0–10. It has been shown to reflect the clinical improvement after ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Here we report the use of U22 in measuring improvement after catheter ablation for AF. Material and methods. A total of 105 patients underwent first-time ablation for AF and answered U22 and SF-36 forms at baseline and follow-up 304 (SD 121) days after ablation. Independently, the patients underwent a clinical follow-up. All decisions regarding medication and reablation were taken without knowledge of the symptom scores. Results. The U22 scores for well-being, arrhythmia as cause for impaired well-being, derived time-aspect score for arrhythmia, and discomfort during attack detected relevant improvements of symptoms after the ablation. U22 showed larger improvement in patients undergoing only one procedure than in patients who later underwent repeated interventions, thus reflecting the independent clinical decision for reablation. Conclusion.U22 quantifies the symptomatic improvement after AF ablation with adequate internal consistency and construct validity. U22 mirrors aspects of the arrhythmia symptomatology other than SF-36. Informa Healthcare 2013-11 2013-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4190885/ /pubmed/24102147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.821190 Text en © Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Höglund, Niklas
Rönn, Folke
Tollefsen, Titti
Jensen, Steen m.
Kesek, Milos
U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_full U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_short U22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_sort u22 protocol as measure of symptomatic improvement after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24102147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.821190
work_keys_str_mv AT hoglundniklas u22protocolasmeasureofsymptomaticimprovementaftercatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT ronnfolke u22protocolasmeasureofsymptomaticimprovementaftercatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT tollefsentitti u22protocolasmeasureofsymptomaticimprovementaftercatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT jensensteenm u22protocolasmeasureofsymptomaticimprovementaftercatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT kesekmilos u22protocolasmeasureofsymptomaticimprovementaftercatheterablationofatrialfibrillation