Cargando…

Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) appear to gain particular benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) if their disease tests positive for EGFR activating mutations. Recently, several large, controlled, phase III studies have b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paz-Ares, Luis, Soulières, Denis, Moecks, Joachim, Bara, Ilze, Mok, Tony, Klughammer, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25100284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12278
_version_ 1782338564313317376
author Paz-Ares, Luis
Soulières, Denis
Moecks, Joachim
Bara, Ilze
Mok, Tony
Klughammer, Barbara
author_facet Paz-Ares, Luis
Soulières, Denis
Moecks, Joachim
Bara, Ilze
Mok, Tony
Klughammer, Barbara
author_sort Paz-Ares, Luis
collection PubMed
description Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) appear to gain particular benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) if their disease tests positive for EGFR activating mutations. Recently, several large, controlled, phase III studies have been published in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumours. Given the increased patient dataset now available, a comprehensive literature search for EGFR TKIs or chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was undertaken to update the results of a previously published pooled analysis. Pooling eligible progression-free survival (PFS) data from 27 erlotinib studies (n = 731), 54 gefitinib studies (n = 1802) and 20 chemotherapy studies (n = 984) provided median PFS values for each treatment. The pooled median PFS was: 12.4 months (95% accuracy intervals [AI] 11.6–13.4) for erlotinib-treated patients; 9.4 months (95% AI 9.0–9.8) for gefitinib-treated patients; and 5.6 months (95% AI 5.3–6.0) for chemotherapy. Both erlotinib and gefitinib resulted in significantly longer PFS than chemotherapy (permutation testing; P = 0.000 and P = 0.000, respectively). Data on more recent TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib and icotinib) were insufficient at this time-point to carry out a pooled PFS analysis on these compounds. The results of this updated pooled analysis suggest a substantial clear PFS benefit of treating patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with erlotinib or gefitinib compared with chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4190899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41908992014-12-03 Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC Paz-Ares, Luis Soulières, Denis Moecks, Joachim Bara, Ilze Mok, Tony Klughammer, Barbara J Cell Mol Med Original Articles Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) appear to gain particular benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) if their disease tests positive for EGFR activating mutations. Recently, several large, controlled, phase III studies have been published in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumours. Given the increased patient dataset now available, a comprehensive literature search for EGFR TKIs or chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was undertaken to update the results of a previously published pooled analysis. Pooling eligible progression-free survival (PFS) data from 27 erlotinib studies (n = 731), 54 gefitinib studies (n = 1802) and 20 chemotherapy studies (n = 984) provided median PFS values for each treatment. The pooled median PFS was: 12.4 months (95% accuracy intervals [AI] 11.6–13.4) for erlotinib-treated patients; 9.4 months (95% AI 9.0–9.8) for gefitinib-treated patients; and 5.6 months (95% AI 5.3–6.0) for chemotherapy. Both erlotinib and gefitinib resulted in significantly longer PFS than chemotherapy (permutation testing; P = 0.000 and P = 0.000, respectively). Data on more recent TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib and icotinib) were insufficient at this time-point to carry out a pooled PFS analysis on these compounds. The results of this updated pooled analysis suggest a substantial clear PFS benefit of treating patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with erlotinib or gefitinib compared with chemotherapy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-08 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4190899/ /pubmed/25100284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12278 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Paz-Ares, Luis
Soulières, Denis
Moecks, Joachim
Bara, Ilze
Mok, Tony
Klughammer, Barbara
Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC
title Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC
title_full Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC
title_fullStr Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC
title_full_unstemmed Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC
title_short Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC
title_sort pooled analysis of clinical outcome for egfr tki-treated patients with egfr mutation-positive nsclc
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25100284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12278
work_keys_str_mv AT pazaresluis pooledanalysisofclinicaloutcomeforegfrtkitreatedpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclc
AT soulieresdenis pooledanalysisofclinicaloutcomeforegfrtkitreatedpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclc
AT moecksjoachim pooledanalysisofclinicaloutcomeforegfrtkitreatedpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclc
AT barailze pooledanalysisofclinicaloutcomeforegfrtkitreatedpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclc
AT moktony pooledanalysisofclinicaloutcomeforegfrtkitreatedpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclc
AT klughammerbarbara pooledanalysisofclinicaloutcomeforegfrtkitreatedpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclc