Cargando…

Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits

Schizophrenia patients have been reported to be more impaired in comprehending non-literal than literal language since early studies on proverbs. Preference for literal rather than figurative interpretations continues to be documented. The main aim of this study was to establish whether patients are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pesciarelli, Francesca, Gamberoni, Tania, Ferlazzo, Fabio, Lo Russo, Leo, Pedrazzi, Francesca, Melati, Ermanno, Cacciari, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25346676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00799
_version_ 1782338581747990528
author Pesciarelli, Francesca
Gamberoni, Tania
Ferlazzo, Fabio
Lo Russo, Leo
Pedrazzi, Francesca
Melati, Ermanno
Cacciari, Cristina
author_facet Pesciarelli, Francesca
Gamberoni, Tania
Ferlazzo, Fabio
Lo Russo, Leo
Pedrazzi, Francesca
Melati, Ermanno
Cacciari, Cristina
author_sort Pesciarelli, Francesca
collection PubMed
description Schizophrenia patients have been reported to be more impaired in comprehending non-literal than literal language since early studies on proverbs. Preference for literal rather than figurative interpretations continues to be documented. The main aim of this study was to establish whether patients are indeed able to use combinatorial semantic processing to comprehend literal sentences and both combinatorial analysis, and retrieval of pre-stored meanings to comprehend idiomatic sentences. The study employed a sentence continuation task in which subjects were asked to decide whether a target word was a sensible continuation of a previous sentence fragment to investigate idiomatic and literal sentence comprehension in patients with paranoid schizophrenia. Patients and healthy controls were faster in accepting sensible continuations than in rejecting non-sensible ones in both literal and idiomatic sentences. Patients were as accurate as controls in comprehending literal and idiomatic sentences, but they were overall slower than controls in all conditions. Once the contribution of cognitive covariates was partialled out, the response times (RTs) to sensible idiomatic continuations of patients did not significantly differ from those of controls. This suggests that the state of residual schizophrenia did not contribute to slower processing of sensible idioms above and beyond the cognitive deficits that are typically associated with schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4190991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41909912014-10-24 Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits Pesciarelli, Francesca Gamberoni, Tania Ferlazzo, Fabio Lo Russo, Leo Pedrazzi, Francesca Melati, Ermanno Cacciari, Cristina Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Schizophrenia patients have been reported to be more impaired in comprehending non-literal than literal language since early studies on proverbs. Preference for literal rather than figurative interpretations continues to be documented. The main aim of this study was to establish whether patients are indeed able to use combinatorial semantic processing to comprehend literal sentences and both combinatorial analysis, and retrieval of pre-stored meanings to comprehend idiomatic sentences. The study employed a sentence continuation task in which subjects were asked to decide whether a target word was a sensible continuation of a previous sentence fragment to investigate idiomatic and literal sentence comprehension in patients with paranoid schizophrenia. Patients and healthy controls were faster in accepting sensible continuations than in rejecting non-sensible ones in both literal and idiomatic sentences. Patients were as accurate as controls in comprehending literal and idiomatic sentences, but they were overall slower than controls in all conditions. Once the contribution of cognitive covariates was partialled out, the response times (RTs) to sensible idiomatic continuations of patients did not significantly differ from those of controls. This suggests that the state of residual schizophrenia did not contribute to slower processing of sensible idioms above and beyond the cognitive deficits that are typically associated with schizophrenia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4190991/ /pubmed/25346676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00799 Text en Copyright © 2014 Pesciarelli, Gamberoni, Ferlazzo, Lo Russo, Pedrazzi, Melati and Cacciari. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Pesciarelli, Francesca
Gamberoni, Tania
Ferlazzo, Fabio
Lo Russo, Leo
Pedrazzi, Francesca
Melati, Ermanno
Cacciari, Cristina
Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits
title Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits
title_full Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits
title_fullStr Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits
title_full_unstemmed Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits
title_short Is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid Schizophrenia? A window into semantic processing deficits
title_sort is the comprehension of idiomatic sentences indeed impaired in paranoid schizophrenia? a window into semantic processing deficits
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25346676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00799
work_keys_str_mv AT pesciarellifrancesca isthecomprehensionofidiomaticsentencesindeedimpairedinparanoidschizophreniaawindowintosemanticprocessingdeficits
AT gamberonitania isthecomprehensionofidiomaticsentencesindeedimpairedinparanoidschizophreniaawindowintosemanticprocessingdeficits
AT ferlazzofabio isthecomprehensionofidiomaticsentencesindeedimpairedinparanoidschizophreniaawindowintosemanticprocessingdeficits
AT lorussoleo isthecomprehensionofidiomaticsentencesindeedimpairedinparanoidschizophreniaawindowintosemanticprocessingdeficits
AT pedrazzifrancesca isthecomprehensionofidiomaticsentencesindeedimpairedinparanoidschizophreniaawindowintosemanticprocessingdeficits
AT melatiermanno isthecomprehensionofidiomaticsentencesindeedimpairedinparanoidschizophreniaawindowintosemanticprocessingdeficits
AT cacciaricristina isthecomprehensionofidiomaticsentencesindeedimpairedinparanoidschizophreniaawindowintosemanticprocessingdeficits