Cargando…

Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups

During this study, we investigated the extent to which diagnosis-related group (DRG) relative weights based exclusively on charge data differ from DRG weights constructed according to the methodology used in deriving the original relative weights for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS). Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cotterill, Philip, Bobula, Joel, Connerton, Rose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1986
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4191521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10311495
_version_ 1782338680879316992
author Cotterill, Philip
Bobula, Joel
Connerton, Rose
author_facet Cotterill, Philip
Bobula, Joel
Connerton, Rose
author_sort Cotterill, Philip
collection PubMed
description During this study, we investigated the extent to which diagnosis-related group (DRG) relative weights based exclusively on charge data differ from DRG weights constructed according to the methodology used in deriving the original relative weights for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS). The PPS operating cost weights were based on a combination of cost and adjusted charge information (Pettengill and Vertrees, 1982). The results of this study reveal only minor differences between the two sets of weights. Interhospital differences in cost-to-charge ratios do not produce large, arbitrary differences between charge-based and operating cost weights. Whether the data are standardized for differences in capital and medical education costs also appears to make little difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4191521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1986
publisher CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41915212014-11-04 Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups Cotterill, Philip Bobula, Joel Connerton, Rose Health Care Financ Rev Research Article During this study, we investigated the extent to which diagnosis-related group (DRG) relative weights based exclusively on charge data differ from DRG weights constructed according to the methodology used in deriving the original relative weights for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS). The PPS operating cost weights were based on a combination of cost and adjusted charge information (Pettengill and Vertrees, 1982). The results of this study reveal only minor differences between the two sets of weights. Interhospital differences in cost-to-charge ratios do not produce large, arbitrary differences between charge-based and operating cost weights. Whether the data are standardized for differences in capital and medical education costs also appears to make little difference. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1986 /pmc/articles/PMC4191521/ /pubmed/10311495 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Cotterill, Philip
Bobula, Joel
Connerton, Rose
Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups
title Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups
title_full Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups
title_fullStr Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups
title_short Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups
title_sort comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4191521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10311495
work_keys_str_mv AT cotterillphilip comparisonofalternativerelativeweightsfordiagnosisrelatedgroups
AT bobulajoel comparisonofalternativerelativeweightsfordiagnosisrelatedgroups
AT connertonrose comparisonofalternativerelativeweightsfordiagnosisrelatedgroups