Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology was created from the merger of two journals within the BMC series published by BioMed Central: BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical Pharmacology. BMC Pharmacology operated anonymous peer review whereas BMC Clinical Pharmacology operated a fully open peer review policy wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moylan, Elizabeth C, Harold, Simon, O’Neill, Ciaran, Kowalczuk, Maria K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Editorial
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4191873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25266119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-55
_version_ 1782338718230642688
author Moylan, Elizabeth C
Harold, Simon
O’Neill, Ciaran
Kowalczuk, Maria K
author_facet Moylan, Elizabeth C
Harold, Simon
O’Neill, Ciaran
Kowalczuk, Maria K
author_sort Moylan, Elizabeth C
collection PubMed
description BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology was created from the merger of two journals within the BMC series published by BioMed Central: BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical Pharmacology. BMC Pharmacology operated anonymous peer review whereas BMC Clinical Pharmacology operated a fully open peer review policy where the identity of the reviewers was known to the editors, authors and readers. The merged journal also adopted a fully open peer review policy. Two years on we discuss the views and experiences of our Editorial Board Members towards open peer review on this biomedical journal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4191873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41918732014-10-10 Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer? Moylan, Elizabeth C Harold, Simon O’Neill, Ciaran Kowalczuk, Maria K BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Editorial BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology was created from the merger of two journals within the BMC series published by BioMed Central: BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical Pharmacology. BMC Pharmacology operated anonymous peer review whereas BMC Clinical Pharmacology operated a fully open peer review policy where the identity of the reviewers was known to the editors, authors and readers. The merged journal also adopted a fully open peer review policy. Two years on we discuss the views and experiences of our Editorial Board Members towards open peer review on this biomedical journal. BioMed Central 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4191873/ /pubmed/25266119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-55 Text en Copyright © 2014 Moylan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Editorial
Moylan, Elizabeth C
Harold, Simon
O’Neill, Ciaran
Kowalczuk, Maria K
Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
title Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
title_full Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
title_fullStr Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
title_full_unstemmed Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
title_short Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
title_sort open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4191873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25266119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-55
work_keys_str_mv AT moylanelizabethc opensingleblinddoubleblindwhichpeerreviewprocessdoyouprefer
AT haroldsimon opensingleblinddoubleblindwhichpeerreviewprocessdoyouprefer
AT oneillciaran opensingleblinddoubleblindwhichpeerreviewprocessdoyouprefer
AT kowalczukmariak opensingleblinddoubleblindwhichpeerreviewprocessdoyouprefer

Ejemplares similares