Cargando…

Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology was created from the merger of two journals within the BMC series published by BioMed Central: BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical Pharmacology. BMC Pharmacology operated anonymous peer review whereas BMC Clinical Pharmacology operated a fully open peer review policy wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Moylan, Elizabeth C, Harold, Simon, O’Neill, Ciaran, Kowalczuk, Maria K
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2014
Materias:	Editorial
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4191873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25266119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-55

Ejemplares similares

Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
por: Kowalczuk, Maria K, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Blinding peer review
por: Taffe, Michael A
Publicado: (2021)

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
por: Tomkins, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Why Double-Blind Review Is Preferable for Scholarly Journals
por: Lotfi, Behrooz, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
por: Parmanne, Piitu, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Ten considerations for open peer review
por: Schmidt, Birgit, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Are Preprints Eligible for Submission in Medical Journals following Double-Blind Peer Review?
por: Vijayakumar, Vinodhadevi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Laparoscopic entry techniques: Which should you prefer?
por: Raimondo, Diego, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions
por: Boughton, Stephanie L., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault
por: Chabris, Christopher F, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Health preferences and preventive care utilisation: How EQ-5D-5L health preferences may affect uptake
por: Kelleher, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Who knew? The misleading specificity of “double-blind” and what to do about it
por: Lang, Thomas A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

What Did Your Peers Do to You in High School?
por: Yoo, Hee Jeong
Publicado: (2021)

Which Cholecystectomy do Medical Students Prefer?
por: Carvalho, Gustavo L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Which articles do the editors prefer to publish?
por: Atik, O. Şahap
Publicado: (2022)

Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers?
por: Seeber, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Recurrent alveolar hemorrhage: How do you treat that which you cannot see?
por: Jobin, Philipose, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What happens to your hearing if you are born blind?
por: King, Andrew J.
Publicado: (2014)

How to lead your peers and others who do not report to you
por: Palmer, Russell E, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Blind fish: An eye opener
por: Ojha, Akanksha, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Can Acupuncture Treatment Be Double-Blinded? An Evaluation of Double-Blind Acupuncture Treatment of Postoperative Pain
por: Vase, Lene, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How do you prefer your resuscitation solution? Do you want a little bit more salt?
por: Dal-Pizzol, Felipe, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
por: Brown, Richard J.C.
Publicado: (2006)

Putative modulation of the gut microbiome by probiotics enhances preference for novelty in a preliminary double-blind placebo-controlled study in ferrets
por: Dugyala, Supritha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Incentives for Research Effort: An Evolutionary Model of Publication Markets with Double-Blind and Open Review
por: Radzvilas, Mantas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The cases for and against double-blind reviews
por: Cox, Amelia R., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Blinding of Peer Review and the Impact on Geographic Diversity of Authors in the Medical Literature
por: Thabit, Abrar K
Publicado: (2023)

Sleep Patterns in Children With Blindness: A Comparison With Normally Sighted Peers
por: Adhikari, Srijana, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Cost of Blindness in the Republic of Ireland 2010–2020
por: Green, D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Definition of blindness under National Programme for Control of Blindness: Do we need to revise it?
por: Vashist, Praveen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
por: Wechsler, Robert T, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Summative peer marking?
por: O’Neill, Lotte, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Morphine versus Nalbuphine for Open Gynaecological Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double Blinded Trial
por: Akshat, Shiv, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cardioprotective Effects of Propofol-Dexmedetomidine in Open-Heart Surgery: A Prospective Double-Blind Study
por: Elgebaly, Ahmed Said, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Biosimilar Nocebo Effect? A Systematic Review of Double-Blinded Versus Open-Label Studies
por: Odinet, Johlee S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Which method of pancreatic surgery do medical consumers prefer among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery? A survey
por: Kwon, Wooil, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

By using either endogenous or transplanted stem cells, which could you prefer for neural regeneration?
por: Matsuda, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The old versus the new: which do you keep in postoperative Crohn's disease?
por: Kotze, Paulo Gustavo, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Manipulation Detection and Preference Alterations in a Choice Blindness Paradigm
por: Taya, Fumihiko, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

What if there is no prospective, double blind, randomised trial?
por: de Groot, J. R.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_k1rukrresvtbfvibjf15r8l2d6