Cargando…

Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: To report our experience with small incision lenticule extraction ("SMILE") for myopia treatment. METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, we evaluated 447 eyes from 224 patients with myopia, with and without astigmatism. We followed the patients for 6 months after SMILE. R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae Ryun, Hwang, Hyung Bin, Mun, Su Joung, Chung, Young Taek, Kim, Hyun Seung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-117
_version_ 1782338761826238464
author Kim, Jae Ryun
Hwang, Hyung Bin
Mun, Su Joung
Chung, Young Taek
Kim, Hyun Seung
author_facet Kim, Jae Ryun
Hwang, Hyung Bin
Mun, Su Joung
Chung, Young Taek
Kim, Hyun Seung
author_sort Kim, Jae Ryun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To report our experience with small incision lenticule extraction ("SMILE") for myopia treatment. METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, we evaluated 447 eyes from 224 patients with myopia, with and without astigmatism. We followed the patients for 6 months after SMILE. RESULTS: The mean (±standard deviation, SD) spherical equivalent was -6.75 ± 1.65 diopters (D) preoperatively and -0.21 ± 0.37 D at 6 months postoperatively. Our data showed that 97.9% of eyes were within ±1.0 D and 86.1% were within ±0.5 D of the intended correction. Furthermore, 79.8% had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 0 logMAR or less (20/20 or better in the Snellen equivalent) 6 months after surgery. Additionally, 48.5% remained unchanged, 41% gained one line of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), 7.2% gained two lines of CDVA, 3.3% lost one line of CDVA, and 0.3% lost two or more lines of CDVA. Age was the only predictor for worsening UDVA at 6 months postoperatively in linear regression analyses (0.07 decrease logMAR per increased 10 years of age; P < 0.05). No predictor showed an association with error in spherical equivalent refraction at 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE is an effective and safe refractive surgery. Age was the only predictor that influenced visual outcome, but its effect appeared clinically insignificant. Faster visual recovery is also expected with improved surgical technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4192335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41923352014-10-11 Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study Kim, Jae Ryun Hwang, Hyung Bin Mun, Su Joung Chung, Young Taek Kim, Hyun Seung BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To report our experience with small incision lenticule extraction ("SMILE") for myopia treatment. METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, we evaluated 447 eyes from 224 patients with myopia, with and without astigmatism. We followed the patients for 6 months after SMILE. RESULTS: The mean (±standard deviation, SD) spherical equivalent was -6.75 ± 1.65 diopters (D) preoperatively and -0.21 ± 0.37 D at 6 months postoperatively. Our data showed that 97.9% of eyes were within ±1.0 D and 86.1% were within ±0.5 D of the intended correction. Furthermore, 79.8% had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 0 logMAR or less (20/20 or better in the Snellen equivalent) 6 months after surgery. Additionally, 48.5% remained unchanged, 41% gained one line of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), 7.2% gained two lines of CDVA, 3.3% lost one line of CDVA, and 0.3% lost two or more lines of CDVA. Age was the only predictor for worsening UDVA at 6 months postoperatively in linear regression analyses (0.07 decrease logMAR per increased 10 years of age; P < 0.05). No predictor showed an association with error in spherical equivalent refraction at 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE is an effective and safe refractive surgery. Age was the only predictor that influenced visual outcome, but its effect appeared clinically insignificant. Faster visual recovery is also expected with improved surgical technique. BioMed Central 2014-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4192335/ /pubmed/25280533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-117 Text en © Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Jae Ryun
Hwang, Hyung Bin
Mun, Su Joung
Chung, Young Taek
Kim, Hyun Seung
Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study
title Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study
title_full Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study
title_short Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study
title_sort efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-117
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaeryun efficacypredictabilityandsafetyofsmallincisionlenticuleextraction6monthsprospectivecohortstudy
AT hwanghyungbin efficacypredictabilityandsafetyofsmallincisionlenticuleextraction6monthsprospectivecohortstudy
AT munsujoung efficacypredictabilityandsafetyofsmallincisionlenticuleextraction6monthsprospectivecohortstudy
AT chungyoungtaek efficacypredictabilityandsafetyofsmallincisionlenticuleextraction6monthsprospectivecohortstudy
AT kimhyunseung efficacypredictabilityandsafetyofsmallincisionlenticuleextraction6monthsprospectivecohortstudy