Cargando…

Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is associated with poor prognosis, but RV assessment by conventional echocardiography remains difficult. We sought to validate RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) and global longitudinal strain rate (RVGLSR) against ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jae-Hyeong, Negishi, Kazuaki, Kwon, Deborah H., Popovic, Zoran B., Grimm, Richard A., Marwick, Thomas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Echocardiography 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309687
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.113
_version_ 1782338779084750848
author Park, Jae-Hyeong
Negishi, Kazuaki
Kwon, Deborah H.
Popovic, Zoran B.
Grimm, Richard A.
Marwick, Thomas H.
author_facet Park, Jae-Hyeong
Negishi, Kazuaki
Kwon, Deborah H.
Popovic, Zoran B.
Grimm, Richard A.
Marwick, Thomas H.
author_sort Park, Jae-Hyeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is associated with poor prognosis, but RV assessment by conventional echocardiography remains difficult. We sought to validate RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) and global longitudinal strain rate (RVGLSR) against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and outcome in ICM. METHODS: In 57 patients (43 men, 64 ± 12 years) with ICM who underwent conventional and strain echocardiography and CMR, RVGLS and RVGLSR were measured off-line. RV dysfunction was determined by CMR [RV ejection fraction (RVEF) < 50%]. Patients were followed over 15 ± 9 months for a composite of death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure. RESULTS: RVGLS showed significant correlations with CMR RVEF (r = -0.797, p < 0.01), RV fractional area change (RVFAC, r = -0.530, p < 0.01), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, r = -0.547, p < 0.01). RVGLSR showed significant correlations between CMR RVEF (r = -0.668, p < 0.01), RVFAC (r = -0.394, p < 0.01), and TAPSE (r = -0.435, p < 0.01). RVGLS and RVGLSR showed significant correlations with pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.527 and r = 0.500, p < 0.01, respectively). The best cutoff value of RVGLS for detection of RV dysfunction was -15.4% [areas under the curve (AUC) = 0.955, p < 0.01] with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity 95%. The best cutoff value for RVGLSR was -0.94 s(-1) (AUC = 0.871, p < 0.01), sensitivity 72%, specificity 86%. During follow-up, there were 12 adverse events. In Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis, impaired RVGLS [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.46, p = 0.030] and impaired RVGLSR (HR = 3.95, p = 0.044) were associated with adverse clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters, RVGLS and RVGLSR correlate better with CMR RVEF and outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4192408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Society of Echocardiography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41924082014-10-10 Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome Park, Jae-Hyeong Negishi, Kazuaki Kwon, Deborah H. Popovic, Zoran B. Grimm, Richard A. Marwick, Thomas H. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is associated with poor prognosis, but RV assessment by conventional echocardiography remains difficult. We sought to validate RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) and global longitudinal strain rate (RVGLSR) against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and outcome in ICM. METHODS: In 57 patients (43 men, 64 ± 12 years) with ICM who underwent conventional and strain echocardiography and CMR, RVGLS and RVGLSR were measured off-line. RV dysfunction was determined by CMR [RV ejection fraction (RVEF) < 50%]. Patients were followed over 15 ± 9 months for a composite of death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure. RESULTS: RVGLS showed significant correlations with CMR RVEF (r = -0.797, p < 0.01), RV fractional area change (RVFAC, r = -0.530, p < 0.01), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, r = -0.547, p < 0.01). RVGLSR showed significant correlations between CMR RVEF (r = -0.668, p < 0.01), RVFAC (r = -0.394, p < 0.01), and TAPSE (r = -0.435, p < 0.01). RVGLS and RVGLSR showed significant correlations with pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.527 and r = 0.500, p < 0.01, respectively). The best cutoff value of RVGLS for detection of RV dysfunction was -15.4% [areas under the curve (AUC) = 0.955, p < 0.01] with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity 95%. The best cutoff value for RVGLSR was -0.94 s(-1) (AUC = 0.871, p < 0.01), sensitivity 72%, specificity 86%. During follow-up, there were 12 adverse events. In Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis, impaired RVGLS [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.46, p = 0.030] and impaired RVGLSR (HR = 3.95, p = 0.044) were associated with adverse clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters, RVGLS and RVGLSR correlate better with CMR RVEF and outcome. Korean Society of Echocardiography 2014-09 2014-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4192408/ /pubmed/25309687 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.113 Text en Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Echocardiography http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jae-Hyeong
Negishi, Kazuaki
Kwon, Deborah H.
Popovic, Zoran B.
Grimm, Richard A.
Marwick, Thomas H.
Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome
title Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome
title_full Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome
title_fullStr Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome
title_short Validation of Global Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate as Reliable Markers of Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Outcome
title_sort validation of global longitudinal strain and strain rate as reliable markers of right ventricular dysfunction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and outcome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309687
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.113
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjaehyeong validationofgloballongitudinalstrainandstrainrateasreliablemarkersofrightventriculardysfunctioncomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceandoutcome
AT negishikazuaki validationofgloballongitudinalstrainandstrainrateasreliablemarkersofrightventriculardysfunctioncomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceandoutcome
AT kwondeborahh validationofgloballongitudinalstrainandstrainrateasreliablemarkersofrightventriculardysfunctioncomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceandoutcome
AT popoviczoranb validationofgloballongitudinalstrainandstrainrateasreliablemarkersofrightventriculardysfunctioncomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceandoutcome
AT grimmricharda validationofgloballongitudinalstrainandstrainrateasreliablemarkersofrightventriculardysfunctioncomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceandoutcome
AT marwickthomash validationofgloballongitudinalstrainandstrainrateasreliablemarkersofrightventriculardysfunctioncomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceandoutcome