Cargando…
Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea?
Male factors account for 20%-50% of cases of infertility and in 25% of cases, the etiology of male infertility is unknown. Effective treatments are well-established for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, male accessory gland infection, retrograde ejaculation, and positive antisperm antibody. However, th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309854 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2014.41.3.108 |
_version_ | 1782338789165760512 |
---|---|
author | Jung, Jae Hung Seo, Ju Tae |
author_facet | Jung, Jae Hung Seo, Ju Tae |
author_sort | Jung, Jae Hung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Male factors account for 20%-50% of cases of infertility and in 25% of cases, the etiology of male infertility is unknown. Effective treatments are well-established for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, male accessory gland infection, retrograde ejaculation, and positive antisperm antibody. However, the appropriate treatment for idiopathic male infertility is unclear. Empirical medical treatment (EMT) has been used in men with idiopathic infertility and can be divided into two categories based on the mode of action: hormonal treatment and antioxidant supplementation. Hormonal medications consist of gonadotropins, androgens, estrogen receptor blockers, and aromatase inhibitors. Antioxidants such as vitamins, zinc, and carnitines have also been widely used to reduce oxidative stress-induced spermatozoa damage. Although scientifically acceptable evidence of EMT is limited because of the lack of large, randomized, controlled studies, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses have shown that the administration of gonadotropins, anti-estrogens, and oral antioxidants results in a significant increase in the live birth rate compared with control treatments. Therefore, all physicians who treat infertility should bear in mind that EMT can improve semen parameters and subsequent fertility potential through natural intercourse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4192450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41924502014-10-10 Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea? Jung, Jae Hung Seo, Ju Tae Clin Exp Reprod Med Review Male factors account for 20%-50% of cases of infertility and in 25% of cases, the etiology of male infertility is unknown. Effective treatments are well-established for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, male accessory gland infection, retrograde ejaculation, and positive antisperm antibody. However, the appropriate treatment for idiopathic male infertility is unclear. Empirical medical treatment (EMT) has been used in men with idiopathic infertility and can be divided into two categories based on the mode of action: hormonal treatment and antioxidant supplementation. Hormonal medications consist of gonadotropins, androgens, estrogen receptor blockers, and aromatase inhibitors. Antioxidants such as vitamins, zinc, and carnitines have also been widely used to reduce oxidative stress-induced spermatozoa damage. Although scientifically acceptable evidence of EMT is limited because of the lack of large, randomized, controlled studies, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses have shown that the administration of gonadotropins, anti-estrogens, and oral antioxidants results in a significant increase in the live birth rate compared with control treatments. Therefore, all physicians who treat infertility should bear in mind that EMT can improve semen parameters and subsequent fertility potential through natural intercourse. The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2014-09 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4192450/ /pubmed/25309854 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2014.41.3.108 Text en Copyright © 2014. The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Jung, Jae Hung Seo, Ju Tae Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea? |
title | Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea? |
title_full | Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea? |
title_fullStr | Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea? |
title_full_unstemmed | Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea? |
title_short | Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea? |
title_sort | empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: promise or panacea? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309854 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2014.41.3.108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jungjaehung empiricalmedicaltherapyinidiopathicmaleinfertilitypromiseorpanacea AT seojutae empiricalmedicaltherapyinidiopathicmaleinfertilitypromiseorpanacea |