Cargando…

Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data

BACKGROUND : The U.S. HIV staging system is being revised to more comprehensively track early and acute HIV infection (AHI). We evaluated our ability to identify known cases of AHI using King County (KC) HIV surveillance data. METHODOLOGY : AHI cases were men who have sex with men (MSM) with negativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buskin, Susan E, Fida, Neway G, Bennett, Amy B, Golden, Matthew R, Stekler, Joanne D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317222
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601408010045
_version_ 1782338850565128192
author Buskin, Susan E
Fida, Neway G
Bennett, Amy B
Golden, Matthew R
Stekler, Joanne D
author_facet Buskin, Susan E
Fida, Neway G
Bennett, Amy B
Golden, Matthew R
Stekler, Joanne D
author_sort Buskin, Susan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND : The U.S. HIV staging system is being revised to more comprehensively track early and acute HIV infection (AHI). We evaluated our ability to identify known cases of AHI using King County (KC) HIV surveillance data. METHODOLOGY : AHI cases were men who have sex with men (MSM) with negative antibody and positive pooled nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) tests identified through KC testing sites. We used KC surveillance data to calculate inter-test intervals (ITI, time from last negative to first positive test) and the serologic algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion (STARHS). For surveillance data, AHI was defined as an ITI of ≤ 30 days and early infection as an ITI ≤ 180 days or STARHS recent result. Dates of last negative HIV tests were obtained from lab reports in the HIV surveillance system or data collected for HIV Incidence Surveillance. RESULTS : Between 2005 and 2011, 47 MSM with AHI were identified by pooled NAAT. Of the 47 cases, 36% had ITI < 1 day, 60% had an ITI < 30 days, and 70% (95% CI=55-82%) had an ITI ≤ 6 months and would have been identified as early HIV infection. Of the 47, 38% had STARHS testing and 94% were STARHS recent. CONCLUSION : MSM with known AHI were not identified by proposed definitions of AHI and early infection. These known AHI cases were frequently missed by HIV surveillance because concurrent negative antibody tests were not reported. Successful implementation of the revisions to the HIV staging system will require more comprehensive reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4192836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41928362014-10-14 Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data Buskin, Susan E Fida, Neway G Bennett, Amy B Golden, Matthew R Stekler, Joanne D Open AIDS J Article BACKGROUND : The U.S. HIV staging system is being revised to more comprehensively track early and acute HIV infection (AHI). We evaluated our ability to identify known cases of AHI using King County (KC) HIV surveillance data. METHODOLOGY : AHI cases were men who have sex with men (MSM) with negative antibody and positive pooled nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) tests identified through KC testing sites. We used KC surveillance data to calculate inter-test intervals (ITI, time from last negative to first positive test) and the serologic algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion (STARHS). For surveillance data, AHI was defined as an ITI of ≤ 30 days and early infection as an ITI ≤ 180 days or STARHS recent result. Dates of last negative HIV tests were obtained from lab reports in the HIV surveillance system or data collected for HIV Incidence Surveillance. RESULTS : Between 2005 and 2011, 47 MSM with AHI were identified by pooled NAAT. Of the 47 cases, 36% had ITI < 1 day, 60% had an ITI < 30 days, and 70% (95% CI=55-82%) had an ITI ≤ 6 months and would have been identified as early HIV infection. Of the 47, 38% had STARHS testing and 94% were STARHS recent. CONCLUSION : MSM with known AHI were not identified by proposed definitions of AHI and early infection. These known AHI cases were frequently missed by HIV surveillance because concurrent negative antibody tests were not reported. Successful implementation of the revisions to the HIV staging system will require more comprehensive reporting. Bentham Open 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4192836/ /pubmed/25317222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601408010045 Text en © Buskin et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Buskin, Susan E
Fida, Neway G
Bennett, Amy B
Golden, Matthew R
Stekler, Joanne D
Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data
title Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data
title_full Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data
title_fullStr Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data
title_short Evaluating New Definitions of Acute and Early HIV Infection from HIV Surveillance Data
title_sort evaluating new definitions of acute and early hiv infection from hiv surveillance data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317222
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601408010045
work_keys_str_mv AT buskinsusane evaluatingnewdefinitionsofacuteandearlyhivinfectionfromhivsurveillancedata
AT fidanewayg evaluatingnewdefinitionsofacuteandearlyhivinfectionfromhivsurveillancedata
AT bennettamyb evaluatingnewdefinitionsofacuteandearlyhivinfectionfromhivsurveillancedata
AT goldenmatthewr evaluatingnewdefinitionsofacuteandearlyhivinfectionfromhivsurveillancedata
AT steklerjoanned evaluatingnewdefinitionsofacuteandearlyhivinfectionfromhivsurveillancedata