Cargando…

Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Further to reports of a reciprocal relationship between sugar and fat intakes, this review aimed to provide an in-depth analysis and to determine the likely influence of this relationship on the achievement of population dietary guidelines. Using systematic methods, relevant literature was selected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadler, Michele Jeanne, McNulty, Helene, Gibson, Sigrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.654013
_version_ 1782338865721245696
author Sadler, Michele Jeanne
McNulty, Helene
Gibson, Sigrid
author_facet Sadler, Michele Jeanne
McNulty, Helene
Gibson, Sigrid
author_sort Sadler, Michele Jeanne
collection PubMed
description Further to reports of a reciprocal relationship between sugar and fat intakes, this review aimed to provide an in-depth analysis and to determine the likely influence of this relationship on the achievement of population dietary guidelines. Using systematic methods, relevant literature was selected according to preset criteria. A strong and consistent inverse association was found between total sugars and total fat intakes expressed as percentage energy. Fewer studies considered absolute intakes and these reported a positive relationship, which may be influenced by confounding with energy intakes. Evidence for an inverse relationship between percentage energy from fat and extrinsic sugars was weaker and less consistent than for fat and total sugars. Reciprocal relationships were also observed for sugar-saturated fat, sugar−protein, sugar−alcohol, and sugar−starch expressed as percentage energy. Under-reporting of dietary intakes had no major influence on the findings. This review confirms the existence of the sugar−fat seesaw on a percentage energy basis and concludes that it is most likely explained by a combination of mathematical and food compositional effects. This finding is relevant because dietary guidelines are expressed as percentage energy and implies that at the population level multiple guidelines may be difficult to achieve in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4192901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41929012014-10-24 Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence Sadler, Michele Jeanne McNulty, Helene Gibson, Sigrid Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Original Articles Further to reports of a reciprocal relationship between sugar and fat intakes, this review aimed to provide an in-depth analysis and to determine the likely influence of this relationship on the achievement of population dietary guidelines. Using systematic methods, relevant literature was selected according to preset criteria. A strong and consistent inverse association was found between total sugars and total fat intakes expressed as percentage energy. Fewer studies considered absolute intakes and these reported a positive relationship, which may be influenced by confounding with energy intakes. Evidence for an inverse relationship between percentage energy from fat and extrinsic sugars was weaker and less consistent than for fat and total sugars. Reciprocal relationships were also observed for sugar-saturated fat, sugar−protein, sugar−alcohol, and sugar−starch expressed as percentage energy. Under-reporting of dietary intakes had no major influence on the findings. This review confirms the existence of the sugar−fat seesaw on a percentage energy basis and concludes that it is most likely explained by a combination of mathematical and food compositional effects. This finding is relevant because dietary guidelines are expressed as percentage energy and implies that at the population level multiple guidelines may be difficult to achieve in practice. Taylor & Francis 2015-02-23 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4192901/ /pubmed/24915391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.654013 Text en Published with license by Taylor & Francis This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sadler, Michele Jeanne
McNulty, Helene
Gibson, Sigrid
Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_full Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_fullStr Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_short Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_sort sugar-fat seesaw: a systematic review of the evidence
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.654013
work_keys_str_mv AT sadlermichelejeanne sugarfatseesawasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT mcnultyhelene sugarfatseesawasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT gibsonsigrid sugarfatseesawasystematicreviewoftheevidence