Cargando…
Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
Further to reports of a reciprocal relationship between sugar and fat intakes, this review aimed to provide an in-depth analysis and to determine the likely influence of this relationship on the achievement of population dietary guidelines. Using systematic methods, relevant literature was selected...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.654013 |
_version_ | 1782338865721245696 |
---|---|
author | Sadler, Michele Jeanne McNulty, Helene Gibson, Sigrid |
author_facet | Sadler, Michele Jeanne McNulty, Helene Gibson, Sigrid |
author_sort | Sadler, Michele Jeanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Further to reports of a reciprocal relationship between sugar and fat intakes, this review aimed to provide an in-depth analysis and to determine the likely influence of this relationship on the achievement of population dietary guidelines. Using systematic methods, relevant literature was selected according to preset criteria. A strong and consistent inverse association was found between total sugars and total fat intakes expressed as percentage energy. Fewer studies considered absolute intakes and these reported a positive relationship, which may be influenced by confounding with energy intakes. Evidence for an inverse relationship between percentage energy from fat and extrinsic sugars was weaker and less consistent than for fat and total sugars. Reciprocal relationships were also observed for sugar-saturated fat, sugar−protein, sugar−alcohol, and sugar−starch expressed as percentage energy. Under-reporting of dietary intakes had no major influence on the findings. This review confirms the existence of the sugar−fat seesaw on a percentage energy basis and concludes that it is most likely explained by a combination of mathematical and food compositional effects. This finding is relevant because dietary guidelines are expressed as percentage energy and implies that at the population level multiple guidelines may be difficult to achieve in practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4192901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41929012014-10-24 Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence Sadler, Michele Jeanne McNulty, Helene Gibson, Sigrid Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Original Articles Further to reports of a reciprocal relationship between sugar and fat intakes, this review aimed to provide an in-depth analysis and to determine the likely influence of this relationship on the achievement of population dietary guidelines. Using systematic methods, relevant literature was selected according to preset criteria. A strong and consistent inverse association was found between total sugars and total fat intakes expressed as percentage energy. Fewer studies considered absolute intakes and these reported a positive relationship, which may be influenced by confounding with energy intakes. Evidence for an inverse relationship between percentage energy from fat and extrinsic sugars was weaker and less consistent than for fat and total sugars. Reciprocal relationships were also observed for sugar-saturated fat, sugar−protein, sugar−alcohol, and sugar−starch expressed as percentage energy. Under-reporting of dietary intakes had no major influence on the findings. This review confirms the existence of the sugar−fat seesaw on a percentage energy basis and concludes that it is most likely explained by a combination of mathematical and food compositional effects. This finding is relevant because dietary guidelines are expressed as percentage energy and implies that at the population level multiple guidelines may be difficult to achieve in practice. Taylor & Francis 2015-02-23 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4192901/ /pubmed/24915391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.654013 Text en Published with license by Taylor & Francis This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sadler, Michele Jeanne McNulty, Helene Gibson, Sigrid Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title | Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_full | Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_fullStr | Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_short | Sugar-Fat Seesaw: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_sort | sugar-fat seesaw: a systematic review of the evidence |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.654013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadlermichelejeanne sugarfatseesawasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT mcnultyhelene sugarfatseesawasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT gibsonsigrid sugarfatseesawasystematicreviewoftheevidence |