Cargando…
Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
Case-mix systems for nursing homes use resident characteristics to predict the relative use of resources. Seven systems are compared in structure, accuracy in explaining resource use, group homogeneity, and ability to identify residents receiving heavy care. Resource utilization groups, version II (...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
1990
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10113396 |
_version_ | 1782338908450717696 |
---|---|
author | Fries, Brant E. |
author_facet | Fries, Brant E. |
author_sort | Fries, Brant E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Case-mix systems for nursing homes use resident characteristics to predict the relative use of resources. Seven systems are compared in structure, accuracy in explaining resource use, group homogeneity, and ability to identify residents receiving heavy care. Resource utilization groups, version II (RUG-II), was almost uniformly the best system, although management minutes and the Minnesota case-mix system were also highly-effective. Relative weights for case-mix groups were sensitive to cost differences and should be recomputed for new applications. Multiple criteria should be used in choosing a case-mix system, including consideration of inherent incentives and how residents' characteristics are defined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4193118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1990 |
publisher | CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41931182014-11-04 Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment Fries, Brant E. Health Care Financ Rev Research Article Case-mix systems for nursing homes use resident characteristics to predict the relative use of resources. Seven systems are compared in structure, accuracy in explaining resource use, group homogeneity, and ability to identify residents receiving heavy care. Resource utilization groups, version II (RUG-II), was almost uniformly the best system, although management minutes and the Minnesota case-mix system were also highly-effective. Relative weights for case-mix groups were sensitive to cost differences and should be recomputed for new applications. Multiple criteria should be used in choosing a case-mix system, including consideration of inherent incentives and how residents' characteristics are defined. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1990 /pmc/articles/PMC4193118/ /pubmed/10113396 Text en |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fries, Brant E. Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment |
title | Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment |
title_full | Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment |
title_fullStr | Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment |
title_short | Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment |
title_sort | comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10113396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friesbrante comparingcasemixsystemsfornursinghomepayment |