Cargando…

Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment

Case-mix systems for nursing homes use resident characteristics to predict the relative use of resources. Seven systems are compared in structure, accuracy in explaining resource use, group homogeneity, and ability to identify residents receiving heavy care. Resource utilization groups, version II (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fries, Brant E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1990
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10113396
_version_ 1782338908450717696
author Fries, Brant E.
author_facet Fries, Brant E.
author_sort Fries, Brant E.
collection PubMed
description Case-mix systems for nursing homes use resident characteristics to predict the relative use of resources. Seven systems are compared in structure, accuracy in explaining resource use, group homogeneity, and ability to identify residents receiving heavy care. Resource utilization groups, version II (RUG-II), was almost uniformly the best system, although management minutes and the Minnesota case-mix system were also highly-effective. Relative weights for case-mix groups were sensitive to cost differences and should be recomputed for new applications. Multiple criteria should be used in choosing a case-mix system, including consideration of inherent incentives and how residents' characteristics are defined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4193118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1990
publisher CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41931182014-11-04 Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment Fries, Brant E. Health Care Financ Rev Research Article Case-mix systems for nursing homes use resident characteristics to predict the relative use of resources. Seven systems are compared in structure, accuracy in explaining resource use, group homogeneity, and ability to identify residents receiving heavy care. Resource utilization groups, version II (RUG-II), was almost uniformly the best system, although management minutes and the Minnesota case-mix system were also highly-effective. Relative weights for case-mix groups were sensitive to cost differences and should be recomputed for new applications. Multiple criteria should be used in choosing a case-mix system, including consideration of inherent incentives and how residents' characteristics are defined. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1990 /pmc/articles/PMC4193118/ /pubmed/10113396 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Fries, Brant E.
Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
title Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
title_full Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
title_fullStr Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
title_full_unstemmed Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
title_short Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
title_sort comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10113396
work_keys_str_mv AT friesbrante comparingcasemixsystemsfornursinghomepayment