Cargando…
Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) has recently emerged as an effective treatment option for painful bone metastases. We describe here the first experience with volumetric MR-HIFU for palliative treatment of painful bone metastases and evaluate the tech...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-5736-2-16 |
_version_ | 1782339019036688384 |
---|---|
author | Huisman, Merel Lam, Mie K Bartels, Lambertus W Nijenhuis, Robbert J Moonen, Chrit T Knuttel, Floor M Verkooijen, Helena M van Vulpen, Marco van den Bosch, Maurice A |
author_facet | Huisman, Merel Lam, Mie K Bartels, Lambertus W Nijenhuis, Robbert J Moonen, Chrit T Knuttel, Floor M Verkooijen, Helena M van Vulpen, Marco van den Bosch, Maurice A |
author_sort | Huisman, Merel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) has recently emerged as an effective treatment option for painful bone metastases. We describe here the first experience with volumetric MR-HIFU for palliative treatment of painful bone metastases and evaluate the technique on three levels: technical feasibility, safety, and initial effectiveness. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 11 consecutive patients (7 male and 4 female; median age, 60 years; age range, 53–86 years) underwent 13 treatments for 12 bone metastases. All patients exhibited persistent metastatic bone pain refractory to the standard of care. Patients were asked to rate their worst pain on an 11-point pain scale before treatment, 3 days after treatment, and 1 month after treatment. Complications were monitored. All data were prospectively recorded in the context of routine clinical care. Response was defined as a ≥2-point decrease in pain at the treated site without increase in analgesic intake. Baseline pain scores were compared to pain scores at 3 days and 1 month using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For reporting, the STROBE guidelines were followed. RESULTS: No treatment-related major adverse events were observed. At 3 days after volumetric MR-HIFU ablation, pain scores decreased significantly (p = 0.045) and response was observed in a 6/11 (55%) patients. At 1-month follow-up, which was available for nine patients, pain scores decreased significantly compared to baseline (p = 0.028) and 6/9 patients obtained pain response (overall response rate 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35%–88%)). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting on the volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for painful bone metastases. No major treatment-related adverse events were observed during follow-up. The results of our study showed that volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for painful bone metastases is technically feasible and can induce pain relief in patients with metastatic bone pain refractory to the standard of care. Future research should be aimed at standardization of the treatment procedures and treatment of larger numbers of patients to assess treatment effectiveness and comparison to the standard of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4193684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41936842014-10-11 Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases Huisman, Merel Lam, Mie K Bartels, Lambertus W Nijenhuis, Robbert J Moonen, Chrit T Knuttel, Floor M Verkooijen, Helena M van Vulpen, Marco van den Bosch, Maurice A J Ther Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) has recently emerged as an effective treatment option for painful bone metastases. We describe here the first experience with volumetric MR-HIFU for palliative treatment of painful bone metastases and evaluate the technique on three levels: technical feasibility, safety, and initial effectiveness. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 11 consecutive patients (7 male and 4 female; median age, 60 years; age range, 53–86 years) underwent 13 treatments for 12 bone metastases. All patients exhibited persistent metastatic bone pain refractory to the standard of care. Patients were asked to rate their worst pain on an 11-point pain scale before treatment, 3 days after treatment, and 1 month after treatment. Complications were monitored. All data were prospectively recorded in the context of routine clinical care. Response was defined as a ≥2-point decrease in pain at the treated site without increase in analgesic intake. Baseline pain scores were compared to pain scores at 3 days and 1 month using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For reporting, the STROBE guidelines were followed. RESULTS: No treatment-related major adverse events were observed. At 3 days after volumetric MR-HIFU ablation, pain scores decreased significantly (p = 0.045) and response was observed in a 6/11 (55%) patients. At 1-month follow-up, which was available for nine patients, pain scores decreased significantly compared to baseline (p = 0.028) and 6/9 patients obtained pain response (overall response rate 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35%–88%)). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting on the volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for painful bone metastases. No major treatment-related adverse events were observed during follow-up. The results of our study showed that volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for painful bone metastases is technically feasible and can induce pain relief in patients with metastatic bone pain refractory to the standard of care. Future research should be aimed at standardization of the treatment procedures and treatment of larger numbers of patients to assess treatment effectiveness and comparison to the standard of care. BioMed Central 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4193684/ /pubmed/25309743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-5736-2-16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Huisman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Huisman, Merel Lam, Mie K Bartels, Lambertus W Nijenhuis, Robbert J Moonen, Chrit T Knuttel, Floor M Verkooijen, Helena M van Vulpen, Marco van den Bosch, Maurice A Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases |
title | Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases |
title_full | Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases |
title_short | Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases |
title_sort | feasibility of volumetric mri-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (mr-hifu) for painful bone metastases |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-5736-2-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huismanmerel feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT lammiek feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT bartelslambertusw feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT nijenhuisrobbertj feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT moonenchritt feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT knuttelfloorm feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT verkooijenhelenam feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT vanvulpenmarco feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases AT vandenboschmauricea feasibilityofvolumetricmriguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundmrhifuforpainfulbonemetastases |