Cargando…

Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

INTRODUCTION: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fabrizii, Markus, Moinfar, Farid, Jelinek, Herbert F., Karperien, Audrey, Ahammer, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108457
_version_ 1782339026835996672
author Fabrizii, Markus
Moinfar, Farid
Jelinek, Herbert F.
Karperien, Audrey
Ahammer, Helmut
author_facet Fabrizii, Markus
Moinfar, Farid
Jelinek, Herbert F.
Karperien, Audrey
Ahammer, Helmut
author_sort Fabrizii, Markus
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and its fractal dimension was investigated to establish a basis for an objective diagnosis using the method proposed. METHODS: Classical evaluation of the tissue samples was performed by an experienced gynecologic pathologist. Tissue samples were scanned and saved as digital images using Aperio scanner and software. After image segmentation the box counting method as well as multifractal methods were applied to determine the relation between fractal dimension and grades of CIN. A total of 46 images were used to compare the pathologist's neoplasia grades with the predicted groups obtained by fractal methods. RESULTS: Significant or highly significant differences between all grades of CIN could be found. The confusion matrix, comparing between pathologist's grading and predicted group by fractal methods showed a match of 87.1%. Multifractal spectra were able to differentiate between normal epithelium and low grade as well as high grade neoplasia. CONCLUSION: Fractal dimension can be considered to be an objective parameter to grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4193757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41937572014-10-14 Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Fabrizii, Markus Moinfar, Farid Jelinek, Herbert F. Karperien, Audrey Ahammer, Helmut PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and its fractal dimension was investigated to establish a basis for an objective diagnosis using the method proposed. METHODS: Classical evaluation of the tissue samples was performed by an experienced gynecologic pathologist. Tissue samples were scanned and saved as digital images using Aperio scanner and software. After image segmentation the box counting method as well as multifractal methods were applied to determine the relation between fractal dimension and grades of CIN. A total of 46 images were used to compare the pathologist's neoplasia grades with the predicted groups obtained by fractal methods. RESULTS: Significant or highly significant differences between all grades of CIN could be found. The confusion matrix, comparing between pathologist's grading and predicted group by fractal methods showed a match of 87.1%. Multifractal spectra were able to differentiate between normal epithelium and low grade as well as high grade neoplasia. CONCLUSION: Fractal dimension can be considered to be an objective parameter to grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Public Library of Science 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4193757/ /pubmed/25302712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108457 Text en © 2014 Fabrizii et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fabrizii, Markus
Moinfar, Farid
Jelinek, Herbert F.
Karperien, Audrey
Ahammer, Helmut
Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_full Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_fullStr Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_short Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_sort fractal analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108457
work_keys_str_mv AT fabriziimarkus fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT moinfarfarid fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT jelinekherbertf fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT karperienaudrey fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT ahammerhelmut fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia