Cargando…
Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
INTRODUCTION: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108457 |
_version_ | 1782339026835996672 |
---|---|
author | Fabrizii, Markus Moinfar, Farid Jelinek, Herbert F. Karperien, Audrey Ahammer, Helmut |
author_facet | Fabrizii, Markus Moinfar, Farid Jelinek, Herbert F. Karperien, Audrey Ahammer, Helmut |
author_sort | Fabrizii, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and its fractal dimension was investigated to establish a basis for an objective diagnosis using the method proposed. METHODS: Classical evaluation of the tissue samples was performed by an experienced gynecologic pathologist. Tissue samples were scanned and saved as digital images using Aperio scanner and software. After image segmentation the box counting method as well as multifractal methods were applied to determine the relation between fractal dimension and grades of CIN. A total of 46 images were used to compare the pathologist's neoplasia grades with the predicted groups obtained by fractal methods. RESULTS: Significant or highly significant differences between all grades of CIN could be found. The confusion matrix, comparing between pathologist's grading and predicted group by fractal methods showed a match of 87.1%. Multifractal spectra were able to differentiate between normal epithelium and low grade as well as high grade neoplasia. CONCLUSION: Fractal dimension can be considered to be an objective parameter to grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4193757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41937572014-10-14 Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Fabrizii, Markus Moinfar, Farid Jelinek, Herbert F. Karperien, Audrey Ahammer, Helmut PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and its fractal dimension was investigated to establish a basis for an objective diagnosis using the method proposed. METHODS: Classical evaluation of the tissue samples was performed by an experienced gynecologic pathologist. Tissue samples were scanned and saved as digital images using Aperio scanner and software. After image segmentation the box counting method as well as multifractal methods were applied to determine the relation between fractal dimension and grades of CIN. A total of 46 images were used to compare the pathologist's neoplasia grades with the predicted groups obtained by fractal methods. RESULTS: Significant or highly significant differences between all grades of CIN could be found. The confusion matrix, comparing between pathologist's grading and predicted group by fractal methods showed a match of 87.1%. Multifractal spectra were able to differentiate between normal epithelium and low grade as well as high grade neoplasia. CONCLUSION: Fractal dimension can be considered to be an objective parameter to grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Public Library of Science 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4193757/ /pubmed/25302712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108457 Text en © 2014 Fabrizii et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fabrizii, Markus Moinfar, Farid Jelinek, Herbert F. Karperien, Audrey Ahammer, Helmut Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia |
title | Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia |
title_full | Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia |
title_fullStr | Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia |
title_full_unstemmed | Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia |
title_short | Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia |
title_sort | fractal analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabriziimarkus fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia AT moinfarfarid fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia AT jelinekherbertf fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia AT karperienaudrey fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia AT ahammerhelmut fractalanalysisofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia |