Cargando…
Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback
Auditory feedback is required to maintain fluent speech. At present, it is unclear how attention modulates auditory feedback processing during ongoing speech. In this event-related potential (ERP) study, participants vocalized/a/, while they heard their vocal pitch suddenly shifted downward a ½ semi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109968 |
_version_ | 1782339044438441984 |
---|---|
author | Tumber, Anupreet K. Scheerer, Nichole E. Jones, Jeffery A. |
author_facet | Tumber, Anupreet K. Scheerer, Nichole E. Jones, Jeffery A. |
author_sort | Tumber, Anupreet K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Auditory feedback is required to maintain fluent speech. At present, it is unclear how attention modulates auditory feedback processing during ongoing speech. In this event-related potential (ERP) study, participants vocalized/a/, while they heard their vocal pitch suddenly shifted downward a ½ semitone in both single and dual-task conditions. During the single-task condition participants passively viewed a visual stream for cues to start and stop vocalizing. In the dual-task condition, participants vocalized while they identified target stimuli in a visual stream of letters. The presentation rate of the visual stimuli was manipulated in the dual-task condition in order to produce a low, intermediate, and high attentional load. Visual target identification accuracy was lowest in the high attentional load condition, indicating that attentional load was successfully manipulated. Results further showed that participants who were exposed to the single-task condition, prior to the dual-task condition, produced larger vocal compensations during the single-task condition. Thus, when participants’ attention was divided, less attention was available for the monitoring of their auditory feedback, resulting in smaller compensatory vocal responses. However, P1-N1-P2 ERP responses were not affected by divided attention, suggesting that the effect of attentional load was not on the auditory processing of pitch altered feedback, but instead it interfered with the integration of auditory and motor information, or motor control itself. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4193850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41938502014-10-14 Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback Tumber, Anupreet K. Scheerer, Nichole E. Jones, Jeffery A. PLoS One Research Article Auditory feedback is required to maintain fluent speech. At present, it is unclear how attention modulates auditory feedback processing during ongoing speech. In this event-related potential (ERP) study, participants vocalized/a/, while they heard their vocal pitch suddenly shifted downward a ½ semitone in both single and dual-task conditions. During the single-task condition participants passively viewed a visual stream for cues to start and stop vocalizing. In the dual-task condition, participants vocalized while they identified target stimuli in a visual stream of letters. The presentation rate of the visual stimuli was manipulated in the dual-task condition in order to produce a low, intermediate, and high attentional load. Visual target identification accuracy was lowest in the high attentional load condition, indicating that attentional load was successfully manipulated. Results further showed that participants who were exposed to the single-task condition, prior to the dual-task condition, produced larger vocal compensations during the single-task condition. Thus, when participants’ attention was divided, less attention was available for the monitoring of their auditory feedback, resulting in smaller compensatory vocal responses. However, P1-N1-P2 ERP responses were not affected by divided attention, suggesting that the effect of attentional load was not on the auditory processing of pitch altered feedback, but instead it interfered with the integration of auditory and motor information, or motor control itself. Public Library of Science 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4193850/ /pubmed/25303649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109968 Text en © 2014 Tumber et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tumber, Anupreet K. Scheerer, Nichole E. Jones, Jeffery A. Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback |
title | Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback |
title_full | Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback |
title_fullStr | Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback |
title_full_unstemmed | Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback |
title_short | Attentional Demands Influence Vocal Compensations to Pitch Errors Heard in Auditory Feedback |
title_sort | attentional demands influence vocal compensations to pitch errors heard in auditory feedback |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109968 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tumberanupreetk attentionaldemandsinfluencevocalcompensationstopitcherrorsheardinauditoryfeedback AT scheerernicholee attentionaldemandsinfluencevocalcompensationstopitcherrorsheardinauditoryfeedback AT jonesjefferya attentionaldemandsinfluencevocalcompensationstopitcherrorsheardinauditoryfeedback |