Cargando…

When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?

Local excision is increasingly performed for “early stage” rectal cancer in the US; however, local recurrence after local excision has become a controversial issue in Western countries. Local recurrence is considered to originate based on the type of tumor and procedure performed, and in surgical ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maeda, Kotaro, Koide, Yoshikazu, Katsuno, Hidetoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24254058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0766-3
_version_ 1782339073950613504
author Maeda, Kotaro
Koide, Yoshikazu
Katsuno, Hidetoshi
author_facet Maeda, Kotaro
Koide, Yoshikazu
Katsuno, Hidetoshi
author_sort Maeda, Kotaro
collection PubMed
description Local excision is increasingly performed for “early stage” rectal cancer in the US; however, local recurrence after local excision has become a controversial issue in Western countries. Local recurrence is considered to originate based on the type of tumor and procedure performed, and in surgical margin-positive cases. This review focuses on the inclusion criteria of “early” rectal cancers for local excision from the Western and Japanese points of view. “Early” rectal cancer is defined as T1 cancer in the rectum. Only the tumor grade and depth of invasion are the “high risk” factors which can be evaluated before treatment. T1 cancers with sm1 or submucosal invasion <1,000 μm are considered to be “low risk” tumors with less than 3.2 % nodal involvement, and are considered to be candidates for local excision as the sole curative surgery. Tumors with a poor tumor grade should be excluded from local excision. Digital examination, endoscopy or proctoscopy with biopsy, a barium enema study and endorectal ultrasonography are useful for identifying “low risk” or excluding “high risk” factors preoperatively for a comprehensive diagnosis. The selection of an initial local treatment modality is also considered to be important according to the analysis of the nodal involvement rate after initial local treatment and after radical surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4194025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41940252014-10-15 When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer? Maeda, Kotaro Koide, Yoshikazu Katsuno, Hidetoshi Surg Today Review Article Local excision is increasingly performed for “early stage” rectal cancer in the US; however, local recurrence after local excision has become a controversial issue in Western countries. Local recurrence is considered to originate based on the type of tumor and procedure performed, and in surgical margin-positive cases. This review focuses on the inclusion criteria of “early” rectal cancers for local excision from the Western and Japanese points of view. “Early” rectal cancer is defined as T1 cancer in the rectum. Only the tumor grade and depth of invasion are the “high risk” factors which can be evaluated before treatment. T1 cancers with sm1 or submucosal invasion <1,000 μm are considered to be “low risk” tumors with less than 3.2 % nodal involvement, and are considered to be candidates for local excision as the sole curative surgery. Tumors with a poor tumor grade should be excluded from local excision. Digital examination, endoscopy or proctoscopy with biopsy, a barium enema study and endorectal ultrasonography are useful for identifying “low risk” or excluding “high risk” factors preoperatively for a comprehensive diagnosis. The selection of an initial local treatment modality is also considered to be important according to the analysis of the nodal involvement rate after initial local treatment and after radical surgery. Springer Japan 2013-11-21 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4194025/ /pubmed/24254058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0766-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Maeda, Kotaro
Koide, Yoshikazu
Katsuno, Hidetoshi
When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?
title When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?
title_full When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?
title_fullStr When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?
title_full_unstemmed When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?
title_short When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?
title_sort when is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24254058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0766-3
work_keys_str_mv AT maedakotaro whenislocalexcisionappropriateforearlyrectalcancer
AT koideyoshikazu whenislocalexcisionappropriateforearlyrectalcancer
AT katsunohidetoshi whenislocalexcisionappropriateforearlyrectalcancer