Cargando…

Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this paper are to describe the planned implementation and evaluation of the Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER 2) program which originated from the BETTER trial. The pragmatic trial, informed by the Chr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manca, Donna Patricia, Aubrey-Bassler, Kris, Kandola, Kami, Aguilar, Carolina, Campbell-Scherer, Denise, Sopcak, Nicolette, O’Brien, Mary Ann, Meaney, Christopher, Faria, Vee, Baxter, Julia, Moineddin, Rahim, Salvalaggio, Ginetta, Green, Lee, Cave, Andrew, Grunfeld, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25293785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0135-7
_version_ 1782339111202324480
author Manca, Donna Patricia
Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
Kandola, Kami
Aguilar, Carolina
Campbell-Scherer, Denise
Sopcak, Nicolette
O’Brien, Mary Ann
Meaney, Christopher
Faria, Vee
Baxter, Julia
Moineddin, Rahim
Salvalaggio, Ginetta
Green, Lee
Cave, Andrew
Grunfeld, Eva
author_facet Manca, Donna Patricia
Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
Kandola, Kami
Aguilar, Carolina
Campbell-Scherer, Denise
Sopcak, Nicolette
O’Brien, Mary Ann
Meaney, Christopher
Faria, Vee
Baxter, Julia
Moineddin, Rahim
Salvalaggio, Ginetta
Green, Lee
Cave, Andrew
Grunfeld, Eva
author_sort Manca, Donna Patricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objectives of this paper are to describe the planned implementation and evaluation of the Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER 2) program which originated from the BETTER trial. The pragmatic trial, informed by the Chronic Care Model, demonstrated the effectiveness of an approach to Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening (CDPS) involving the use of a new role, the prevention practitioner. The desired goals of the program are improved clinical outcomes, reduction in the burden of chronic disease, and improved sustainability of the health-care system through improved CDPS in primary care. METHODS/DESIGN: The BETTER 2 program aims to expand the implementation of the intervention used in the original BETTER trial into communities across Canada (Alberta, Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, the Northwest Territories and Nova Scotia). This proactive approach provides at-risk patients with an intervention from the prevention practitioner, a health-care professional. Using the BETTER toolkit, the prevention practitioner determines which CDPS actions the patient is eligible to receive, and through shared decision-making and motivational interviewing, develops a unique and individualized ‘prevention prescription’ with the patient. This intervention is 1) personalized; 2) addressing multiple conditions; 3) integrated through linkages to local, regional, or national resources; and 4) longitudinal by assessing patients over time. The BETTER 2 program brings together primary care providers, policy/decision makers and researchers to work towards improving CDPS in primary care. The target patient population is adults aged 40–65. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintain (RE-AIM) framework will inform the evaluation of the program through qualitative and quantitative methods. A composite index will be used to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of the prevention practitioner intervention. The CDPS actions comprising the composite index include the following: process measures, referral/treatment measures, and target/change outcome measures related to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer and associated lifestyle factors. DISCUSSION: The BETTER 2 program is a collaborative approach grounded in practice and built from existing work (i.e., integration not creation). The program evaluation is designed to provide an understanding of issues impacting the implementation of an effective approach for CDPS within primary care that may be adapted to become sustainable in the non-research setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4194415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41944152014-10-14 Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation Manca, Donna Patricia Aubrey-Bassler, Kris Kandola, Kami Aguilar, Carolina Campbell-Scherer, Denise Sopcak, Nicolette O’Brien, Mary Ann Meaney, Christopher Faria, Vee Baxter, Julia Moineddin, Rahim Salvalaggio, Ginetta Green, Lee Cave, Andrew Grunfeld, Eva Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The objectives of this paper are to describe the planned implementation and evaluation of the Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER 2) program which originated from the BETTER trial. The pragmatic trial, informed by the Chronic Care Model, demonstrated the effectiveness of an approach to Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening (CDPS) involving the use of a new role, the prevention practitioner. The desired goals of the program are improved clinical outcomes, reduction in the burden of chronic disease, and improved sustainability of the health-care system through improved CDPS in primary care. METHODS/DESIGN: The BETTER 2 program aims to expand the implementation of the intervention used in the original BETTER trial into communities across Canada (Alberta, Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, the Northwest Territories and Nova Scotia). This proactive approach provides at-risk patients with an intervention from the prevention practitioner, a health-care professional. Using the BETTER toolkit, the prevention practitioner determines which CDPS actions the patient is eligible to receive, and through shared decision-making and motivational interviewing, develops a unique and individualized ‘prevention prescription’ with the patient. This intervention is 1) personalized; 2) addressing multiple conditions; 3) integrated through linkages to local, regional, or national resources; and 4) longitudinal by assessing patients over time. The BETTER 2 program brings together primary care providers, policy/decision makers and researchers to work towards improving CDPS in primary care. The target patient population is adults aged 40–65. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintain (RE-AIM) framework will inform the evaluation of the program through qualitative and quantitative methods. A composite index will be used to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of the prevention practitioner intervention. The CDPS actions comprising the composite index include the following: process measures, referral/treatment measures, and target/change outcome measures related to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer and associated lifestyle factors. DISCUSSION: The BETTER 2 program is a collaborative approach grounded in practice and built from existing work (i.e., integration not creation). The program evaluation is designed to provide an understanding of issues impacting the implementation of an effective approach for CDPS within primary care that may be adapted to become sustainable in the non-research setting. BioMed Central 2014-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4194415/ /pubmed/25293785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0135-7 Text en © Manca et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Manca, Donna Patricia
Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
Kandola, Kami
Aguilar, Carolina
Campbell-Scherer, Denise
Sopcak, Nicolette
O’Brien, Mary Ann
Meaney, Christopher
Faria, Vee
Baxter, Julia
Moineddin, Rahim
Salvalaggio, Ginetta
Green, Lee
Cave, Andrew
Grunfeld, Eva
Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation
title Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation
title_full Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation
title_fullStr Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation
title_short Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation
title_sort implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25293785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0135-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mancadonnapatricia implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT aubreybasslerkris implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT kandolakami implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT aguilarcarolina implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT campbellschererdenise implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT sopcaknicolette implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT obrienmaryann implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT meaneychristopher implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT fariavee implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT baxterjulia implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT moineddinrahim implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT salvalaggioginetta implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT greenlee implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT caveandrew implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation
AT grunfeldeva implementingandevaluatingaprogramtofacilitatechronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginprimarycareamixedmethodsprogramevaluation