Cargando…
Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States
In this article, the authors evaluate the cost and utilization effects of the SELECT implementations in 11 States. In particular they compare the before-and-after enrollment experiences of Medicare beneficiaries newly enrolled in SELECT plans with the experiences of those newly enrolled in tradition...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
1997
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10179998 |
_version_ | 1782339127312646144 |
---|---|
author | Lee, A. James Garfinkel, Steven A. Khandker, Rezaul K. Norton, Edward C. |
author_facet | Lee, A. James Garfinkel, Steven A. Khandker, Rezaul K. Norton, Edward C. |
author_sort | Lee, A. James |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, the authors evaluate the cost and utilization effects of the SELECT implementations in 11 States. In particular they compare the before-and-after enrollment experiences of Medicare beneficiaries newly enrolled in SELECT plans with the experiences of those newly enrolled in traditional medigap plans. Using Medicare claims data for 1991 through 1994, the authors find that Medicare SELECT increased costs in five States, decreased costs in three States, and had no effect in three States. Cost increases were generally related to Part B utilization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4194485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1997 |
publisher | CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41944852014-11-04 Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States Lee, A. James Garfinkel, Steven A. Khandker, Rezaul K. Norton, Edward C. Health Care Financ Rev Innovations in Fee-for-Service Financing and Delivery In this article, the authors evaluate the cost and utilization effects of the SELECT implementations in 11 States. In particular they compare the before-and-after enrollment experiences of Medicare beneficiaries newly enrolled in SELECT plans with the experiences of those newly enrolled in traditional medigap plans. Using Medicare claims data for 1991 through 1994, the authors find that Medicare SELECT increased costs in five States, decreased costs in three States, and had no effect in three States. Cost increases were generally related to Part B utilization. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC4194485/ /pubmed/10179998 Text en |
spellingShingle | Innovations in Fee-for-Service Financing and Delivery Lee, A. James Garfinkel, Steven A. Khandker, Rezaul K. Norton, Edward C. Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States |
title | Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States |
title_full | Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States |
title_fullStr | Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States |
title_short | Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States |
title_sort | impact of medicare select on cost and utilization in 11 states |
topic | Innovations in Fee-for-Service Financing and Delivery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10179998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeajames impactofmedicareselectoncostandutilizationin11states AT garfinkelstevena impactofmedicareselectoncostandutilizationin11states AT khandkerrezaulk impactofmedicareselectoncostandutilizationin11states AT nortonedwardc impactofmedicareselectoncostandutilizationin11states |