Cargando…

Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare

In this study the authors use 3 years of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to evaluate alternative demographic, survey, and claims-based risk adjusters for Medicare capitation payment. The survey health-status models have three to four times the predictive power of the demographic model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pope, Gregory C., Adamache, Killard W., Walsh, Edith G., Khandker, Rezaul K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25372855
_version_ 1782339136973176832
author Pope, Gregory C.
Adamache, Killard W.
Walsh, Edith G.
Khandker, Rezaul K.
author_facet Pope, Gregory C.
Adamache, Killard W.
Walsh, Edith G.
Khandker, Rezaul K.
author_sort Pope, Gregory C.
collection PubMed
description In this study the authors use 3 years of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to evaluate alternative demographic, survey, and claims-based risk adjusters for Medicare capitation payment. The survey health-status models have three to four times the predictive power of the demographic models. The risk-adjustment model derived from claims diagnoses has 75-percent greater predictive power than a comprehensive survey model. No single model predicts average expenditures well for all beneficiary subgroups of interest, suggesting a combined model may be appropriate. More data are needed to obtain stable estimates of model parameters. Advantages and disadvantages of alternative risk adjusters are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4194526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
publisher CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41945262014-11-04 Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare Pope, Gregory C. Adamache, Killard W. Walsh, Edith G. Khandker, Rezaul K. Health Care Financ Rev Research Article In this study the authors use 3 years of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to evaluate alternative demographic, survey, and claims-based risk adjusters for Medicare capitation payment. The survey health-status models have three to four times the predictive power of the demographic models. The risk-adjustment model derived from claims diagnoses has 75-percent greater predictive power than a comprehensive survey model. No single model predicts average expenditures well for all beneficiary subgroups of interest, suggesting a combined model may be appropriate. More data are needed to obtain stable estimates of model parameters. Advantages and disadvantages of alternative risk adjusters are discussed. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1998 /pmc/articles/PMC4194526/ /pubmed/25372855 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Pope, Gregory C.
Adamache, Killard W.
Walsh, Edith G.
Khandker, Rezaul K.
Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare
title Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare
title_full Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare
title_fullStr Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare
title_short Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare
title_sort evaluating alternative risk adjusters for medicare
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25372855
work_keys_str_mv AT popegregoryc evaluatingalternativeriskadjustersformedicare
AT adamachekillardw evaluatingalternativeriskadjustersformedicare
AT walshedithg evaluatingalternativeriskadjustersformedicare
AT khandkerrezaulk evaluatingalternativeriskadjustersformedicare