Cargando…
Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights
This research studied a special-needs population under age 18 who had both private insurance and Medicaid coverage through the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) option. We found that children with managed care plans, particularly health maintenance organizations (HMOs), tended...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
1999
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11481736 |
_version_ | 1782339146232102912 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Benjamin Vanderburg, Nancy |
author_facet | Chan, Benjamin Vanderburg, Nancy |
author_sort | Chan, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This research studied a special-needs population under age 18 who had both private insurance and Medicaid coverage through the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) option. We found that children with managed care plans, particularly health maintenance organizations (HMOs), tended to incur higher total expenses to TEFRA than children with indemnity plans. Our findings also show that managed care in Minnesota tends to provide the same or marginally better coverage as indemnity plans do for core medical items but much less coverage for ancillary items such as home care, therapies, and durable medical equipment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4194614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1999 |
publisher | CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41946142014-11-04 Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights Chan, Benjamin Vanderburg, Nancy Health Care Financ Rev Research Article This research studied a special-needs population under age 18 who had both private insurance and Medicaid coverage through the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) option. We found that children with managed care plans, particularly health maintenance organizations (HMOs), tended to incur higher total expenses to TEFRA than children with indemnity plans. Our findings also show that managed care in Minnesota tends to provide the same or marginally better coverage as indemnity plans do for core medical items but much less coverage for ancillary items such as home care, therapies, and durable medical equipment. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1999 /pmc/articles/PMC4194614/ /pubmed/11481736 Text en |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chan, Benjamin Vanderburg, Nancy Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights |
title | Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights |
title_full | Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights |
title_fullStr | Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights |
title_full_unstemmed | Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights |
title_short | Medicaid TEFRA Option in Minnesota: Implications for Patient Rights |
title_sort | medicaid tefra option in minnesota: implications for patient rights |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11481736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanbenjamin medicaidtefraoptioninminnesotaimplicationsforpatientrights AT vanderburgnancy medicaidtefraoptioninminnesotaimplicationsforpatientrights |