Cargando…

Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence

Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. In this study, we analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenwald, Leslie M., Levy, Jesse M., Ingber, Melvin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11481751
_version_ 1782339160647925760
author Greenwald, Leslie M.
Levy, Jesse M.
Ingber, Melvin J.
author_facet Greenwald, Leslie M.
Levy, Jesse M.
Ingber, Melvin J.
author_sort Greenwald, Leslie M.
collection PubMed
description Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. In this study, we analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of actual managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, it appears that there are significant differences between these populations. The most striking differences are found in the comparison of average risk factors, indicating a clear bias in the managed care populations toward beneficiaries predicted to be less costly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4194679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41946792014-11-04 Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence Greenwald, Leslie M. Levy, Jesse M. Ingber, Melvin J. Health Care Financ Rev Research Article Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. In this study, we analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of actual managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, it appears that there are significant differences between these populations. The most striking differences are found in the comparison of average risk factors, indicating a clear bias in the managed care populations toward beneficiaries predicted to be less costly. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 2000 /pmc/articles/PMC4194679/ /pubmed/11481751 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Greenwald, Leslie M.
Levy, Jesse M.
Ingber, Melvin J.
Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence
title Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence
title_full Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence
title_fullStr Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence
title_short Favorable Selection in the Medicare+Choice Program: New Evidence
title_sort favorable selection in the medicare+choice program: new evidence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11481751
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwaldlesliem favorableselectioninthemedicarechoiceprogramnewevidence
AT levyjessem favorableselectioninthemedicarechoiceprogramnewevidence
AT ingbermelvinj favorableselectioninthemedicarechoiceprogramnewevidence