Cargando…
WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial
INTRODUCTION: Low levels of health-enhancing physical activity require novel approaches that have the potential to reach broad populations. Web-based interventions are a popular approach for behaviour change given their wide reach and accessibility. However, challenges with participant engagement an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006374 |
_version_ | 1782339189235253248 |
---|---|
author | Caperchione, Cristina M Kolt, Gregory S Savage, Trevor N Rosenkranz, Richard R Maeder, Anthony J Vandelanotte, Corneel Duncan, Mitch J Van Itallie, Anetta Tague, Rhys Mummery, W Kerry |
author_facet | Caperchione, Cristina M Kolt, Gregory S Savage, Trevor N Rosenkranz, Richard R Maeder, Anthony J Vandelanotte, Corneel Duncan, Mitch J Van Itallie, Anetta Tague, Rhys Mummery, W Kerry |
author_sort | Caperchione, Cristina M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Low levels of health-enhancing physical activity require novel approaches that have the potential to reach broad populations. Web-based interventions are a popular approach for behaviour change given their wide reach and accessibility. However, challenges with participant engagement and retention reduce the long-term maintenance of behaviour change. Web 2.0 features present a new and innovative online environment supporting greater interactivity, with the potential to increase engagement and retention. In order to understand the applicability of these innovative interventions for the broader population, ‘real-world’ interventions implemented under ‘everyday conditions’ are required. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference in physical activity behaviour between individuals using a traditional Web 1.0 website with those using a novel Web 2.0 website. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study we will aim to recruit 2894 participants. Participants will be recruited from individuals who register with a pre-existing health promotion website that currently provides Web 1.0 features (http://www.10000steps.org.au). Eligible participants who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned to one of the two trial conditions: the pre-existing 10 000 Steps website (with Web 1.0 features) or the newly developed WALK 2.0 website (with Web 2.0 features). Primary and secondary outcome measures will be assessed by self-report at baseline, 3 months and 12 months, and include: physical activity behaviour, height and weight, Internet self-efficacy, website usability, website usage and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethics approval from the University of Western Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference Number H8767) and has been funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Reference Number 589903). Study findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and local community-based presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12611000253909, WHO Universal Trial Number: U111-1119-1755 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4194800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41948002014-10-15 WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial Caperchione, Cristina M Kolt, Gregory S Savage, Trevor N Rosenkranz, Richard R Maeder, Anthony J Vandelanotte, Corneel Duncan, Mitch J Van Itallie, Anetta Tague, Rhys Mummery, W Kerry BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Low levels of health-enhancing physical activity require novel approaches that have the potential to reach broad populations. Web-based interventions are a popular approach for behaviour change given their wide reach and accessibility. However, challenges with participant engagement and retention reduce the long-term maintenance of behaviour change. Web 2.0 features present a new and innovative online environment supporting greater interactivity, with the potential to increase engagement and retention. In order to understand the applicability of these innovative interventions for the broader population, ‘real-world’ interventions implemented under ‘everyday conditions’ are required. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference in physical activity behaviour between individuals using a traditional Web 1.0 website with those using a novel Web 2.0 website. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study we will aim to recruit 2894 participants. Participants will be recruited from individuals who register with a pre-existing health promotion website that currently provides Web 1.0 features (http://www.10000steps.org.au). Eligible participants who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned to one of the two trial conditions: the pre-existing 10 000 Steps website (with Web 1.0 features) or the newly developed WALK 2.0 website (with Web 2.0 features). Primary and secondary outcome measures will be assessed by self-report at baseline, 3 months and 12 months, and include: physical activity behaviour, height and weight, Internet self-efficacy, website usability, website usage and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethics approval from the University of Western Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference Number H8767) and has been funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Reference Number 589903). Study findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and local community-based presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12611000253909, WHO Universal Trial Number: U111-1119-1755 BMJ Publishing Group 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4194800/ /pubmed/25304191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006374 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Caperchione, Cristina M Kolt, Gregory S Savage, Trevor N Rosenkranz, Richard R Maeder, Anthony J Vandelanotte, Corneel Duncan, Mitch J Van Itallie, Anetta Tague, Rhys Mummery, W Kerry WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial |
title | WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial |
title_full | WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial |
title_fullStr | WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial |
title_full_unstemmed | WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial |
title_short | WALK 2.0: Examining the effectiveness of Web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial |
title_sort | walk 2.0: examining the effectiveness of web 2.0 features to increase physical activity in a ‘real world’ setting: an ecological trial |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caperchionecristinam walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT koltgregorys walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT savagetrevorn walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT rosenkranzrichardr walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT maederanthonyj walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT vandelanottecorneel walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT duncanmitchj walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT vanitallieanetta walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT taguerhys walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial AT mummerywkerry walk20examiningtheeffectivenessofweb20featurestoincreasephysicalactivityinarealworldsettinganecologicaltrial |