Cargando…

M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy

The primary legislative response to diminishing private plan participation in the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program since 1999 has been substantial payment increases. Analysis of M+C decisions to continue serving or drop counties from 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 reveals that payment amounts, although import...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Halpern, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17290631
_version_ 1782339218430754816
author Halpern, Rachel
author_facet Halpern, Rachel
author_sort Halpern, Rachel
collection PubMed
description The primary legislative response to diminishing private plan participation in the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program since 1999 has been substantial payment increases. Analysis of M+C decisions to continue serving or drop counties from 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 reveals that payment amounts, although important, did not have a consistent impact on these decisions. Plan decisions varied depending on the year and the intention to continue participating in M+C at all. Simulations show that M+C plans were better off, on average, with the payment methodology imposed by the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 than under the previous payment system and that large payment increases would increase plan retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4194933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41949332014-11-04 M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy Halpern, Rachel Health Care Financ Rev Research Article The primary legislative response to diminishing private plan participation in the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program since 1999 has been substantial payment increases. Analysis of M+C decisions to continue serving or drop counties from 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 reveals that payment amounts, although important, did not have a consistent impact on these decisions. Plan decisions varied depending on the year and the intention to continue participating in M+C at all. Simulations show that M+C plans were better off, on average, with the payment methodology imposed by the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 than under the previous payment system and that large payment increases would increase plan retention. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 2005 /pmc/articles/PMC4194933/ /pubmed/17290631 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Halpern, Rachel
M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy
title M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy
title_full M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy
title_fullStr M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy
title_full_unstemmed M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy
title_short M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy
title_sort m+c plan county exit decisions 1999-2001: implications for payment policy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17290631
work_keys_str_mv AT halpernrachel mcplancountyexitdecisions19992001implicationsforpaymentpolicy