Cargando…
M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy
The primary legislative response to diminishing private plan participation in the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program since 1999 has been substantial payment increases. Analysis of M+C decisions to continue serving or drop counties from 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 reveals that payment amounts, although import...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17290631 |
_version_ | 1782339218430754816 |
---|---|
author | Halpern, Rachel |
author_facet | Halpern, Rachel |
author_sort | Halpern, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary legislative response to diminishing private plan participation in the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program since 1999 has been substantial payment increases. Analysis of M+C decisions to continue serving or drop counties from 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 reveals that payment amounts, although important, did not have a consistent impact on these decisions. Plan decisions varied depending on the year and the intention to continue participating in M+C at all. Simulations show that M+C plans were better off, on average, with the payment methodology imposed by the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 than under the previous payment system and that large payment increases would increase plan retention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4194933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41949332014-11-04 M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy Halpern, Rachel Health Care Financ Rev Research Article The primary legislative response to diminishing private plan participation in the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program since 1999 has been substantial payment increases. Analysis of M+C decisions to continue serving or drop counties from 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 reveals that payment amounts, although important, did not have a consistent impact on these decisions. Plan decisions varied depending on the year and the intention to continue participating in M+C at all. Simulations show that M+C plans were better off, on average, with the payment methodology imposed by the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 than under the previous payment system and that large payment increases would increase plan retention. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 2005 /pmc/articles/PMC4194933/ /pubmed/17290631 Text en |
spellingShingle | Research Article Halpern, Rachel M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy |
title | M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy |
title_full | M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy |
title_fullStr | M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy |
title_full_unstemmed | M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy |
title_short | M+C Plan County Exit Decisions 1999-2001: Implications for Payment Policy |
title_sort | m+c plan county exit decisions 1999-2001: implications for payment policy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17290631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halpernrachel mcplancountyexitdecisions19992001implicationsforpaymentpolicy |