Cargando…
Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial
CONTEXT: Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective steril...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25316989 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141946 |
_version_ | 1782339221219966976 |
---|---|
author | Ganavadiya, Rahul Chandra Shekar, B.R. Saxena, Vrinda Tomar, Poonam Gupta, Ruchika Khandelwal, Garima |
author_facet | Ganavadiya, Rahul Chandra Shekar, B.R. Saxena, Vrinda Tomar, Poonam Gupta, Ruchika Khandelwal, Garima |
author_sort | Ganavadiya, Rahul |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective sterilization and disinfection techniques. AIM: The aim was to compare the disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a randomized, cross over trial conducted among three participants selected from a research laboratory, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study participants were examined 4 times on different days. Each time, the coded mouth mirrors of different make were used, and the disinfection was accomplished using coded disinfectants. The reduction in total viable count was compared between the three groups (2% glutaraldehyde, 6% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and 99.9% ethyl alcohol) with distilled water as negative control and autoclaving as a positive control. Furthermore, the predisinfection count was compared between the instruments of different make. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and One-way ANOVA. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. RESULTS: Autoclaved instruments resulted in complete elimination of viable micro-organisms. Maximum reduction in microbial load was observed after disinfection with H(2)O(2) followed by glutaraldehyde, ethyl alcohol and distilled water in descending order. Furthermore, maximum microbial contamination was recorded on locally manufactured mirrors, while standard plain mirrors showed least contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Although, a significant reduction in total viable count was observed with all the disinfectants evaluated in the present study, none of the disinfectants was successful in completely eliminating the viable micro-organisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4194945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41949452014-10-14 Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial Ganavadiya, Rahul Chandra Shekar, B.R. Saxena, Vrinda Tomar, Poonam Gupta, Ruchika Khandelwal, Garima J Basic Clin Pharm Original Article CONTEXT: Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective sterilization and disinfection techniques. AIM: The aim was to compare the disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a randomized, cross over trial conducted among three participants selected from a research laboratory, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study participants were examined 4 times on different days. Each time, the coded mouth mirrors of different make were used, and the disinfection was accomplished using coded disinfectants. The reduction in total viable count was compared between the three groups (2% glutaraldehyde, 6% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and 99.9% ethyl alcohol) with distilled water as negative control and autoclaving as a positive control. Furthermore, the predisinfection count was compared between the instruments of different make. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and One-way ANOVA. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. RESULTS: Autoclaved instruments resulted in complete elimination of viable micro-organisms. Maximum reduction in microbial load was observed after disinfection with H(2)O(2) followed by glutaraldehyde, ethyl alcohol and distilled water in descending order. Furthermore, maximum microbial contamination was recorded on locally manufactured mirrors, while standard plain mirrors showed least contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Although, a significant reduction in total viable count was observed with all the disinfectants evaluated in the present study, none of the disinfectants was successful in completely eliminating the viable micro-organisms. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4194945/ /pubmed/25316989 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141946 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ganavadiya, Rahul Chandra Shekar, B.R. Saxena, Vrinda Tomar, Poonam Gupta, Ruchika Khandelwal, Garima Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial |
title | Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial |
title_full | Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial |
title_short | Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial |
title_sort | disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: a randomized trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25316989 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganavadiyarahul disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial AT chandrashekarbr disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial AT saxenavrinda disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial AT tomarpoonam disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial AT guptaruchika disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial AT khandelwalgarima disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial |