Cargando…

Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial

CONTEXT: Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective steril...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganavadiya, Rahul, Chandra Shekar, B.R., Saxena, Vrinda, Tomar, Poonam, Gupta, Ruchika, Khandelwal, Garima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25316989
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141946
_version_ 1782339221219966976
author Ganavadiya, Rahul
Chandra Shekar, B.R.
Saxena, Vrinda
Tomar, Poonam
Gupta, Ruchika
Khandelwal, Garima
author_facet Ganavadiya, Rahul
Chandra Shekar, B.R.
Saxena, Vrinda
Tomar, Poonam
Gupta, Ruchika
Khandelwal, Garima
author_sort Ganavadiya, Rahul
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective sterilization and disinfection techniques. AIM: The aim was to compare the disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a randomized, cross over trial conducted among three participants selected from a research laboratory, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study participants were examined 4 times on different days. Each time, the coded mouth mirrors of different make were used, and the disinfection was accomplished using coded disinfectants. The reduction in total viable count was compared between the three groups (2% glutaraldehyde, 6% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and 99.9% ethyl alcohol) with distilled water as negative control and autoclaving as a positive control. Furthermore, the predisinfection count was compared between the instruments of different make. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and One-way ANOVA. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. RESULTS: Autoclaved instruments resulted in complete elimination of viable micro-organisms. Maximum reduction in microbial load was observed after disinfection with H(2)O(2) followed by glutaraldehyde, ethyl alcohol and distilled water in descending order. Furthermore, maximum microbial contamination was recorded on locally manufactured mirrors, while standard plain mirrors showed least contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Although, a significant reduction in total viable count was observed with all the disinfectants evaluated in the present study, none of the disinfectants was successful in completely eliminating the viable micro-organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4194945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41949452014-10-14 Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial Ganavadiya, Rahul Chandra Shekar, B.R. Saxena, Vrinda Tomar, Poonam Gupta, Ruchika Khandelwal, Garima J Basic Clin Pharm Original Article CONTEXT: Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective sterilization and disinfection techniques. AIM: The aim was to compare the disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a randomized, cross over trial conducted among three participants selected from a research laboratory, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study participants were examined 4 times on different days. Each time, the coded mouth mirrors of different make were used, and the disinfection was accomplished using coded disinfectants. The reduction in total viable count was compared between the three groups (2% glutaraldehyde, 6% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and 99.9% ethyl alcohol) with distilled water as negative control and autoclaving as a positive control. Furthermore, the predisinfection count was compared between the instruments of different make. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and One-way ANOVA. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. RESULTS: Autoclaved instruments resulted in complete elimination of viable micro-organisms. Maximum reduction in microbial load was observed after disinfection with H(2)O(2) followed by glutaraldehyde, ethyl alcohol and distilled water in descending order. Furthermore, maximum microbial contamination was recorded on locally manufactured mirrors, while standard plain mirrors showed least contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Although, a significant reduction in total viable count was observed with all the disinfectants evaluated in the present study, none of the disinfectants was successful in completely eliminating the viable micro-organisms. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4194945/ /pubmed/25316989 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141946 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ganavadiya, Rahul
Chandra Shekar, B.R.
Saxena, Vrinda
Tomar, Poonam
Gupta, Ruchika
Khandelwal, Garima
Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial
title Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial
title_full Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial
title_fullStr Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial
title_short Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial
title_sort disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: a randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25316989
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141946
work_keys_str_mv AT ganavadiyarahul disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial
AT chandrashekarbr disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial
AT saxenavrinda disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial
AT tomarpoonam disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial
AT guptaruchika disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial
AT khandelwalgarima disinfectingefficacyofthreechemicaldisinfectantsoncontaminateddiagnosticinstrumentsarandomizedtrial