Cargando…
All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out
In the United States, when the cost-containment paradigm shifted from regulation to competition, all-payer hospital ratesetting went out of favor. After reviewing the published literature and supplementing the existing literature with more current information, the author concludes that all-payer rat...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
1992
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25371975 |
_version_ | 1782339262753013760 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Gerard F. |
author_facet | Anderson, Gerard F. |
author_sort | Anderson, Gerard F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the United States, when the cost-containment paradigm shifted from regulation to competition, all-payer hospital ratesetting went out of favor. After reviewing the published literature and supplementing the existing literature with more current information, the author concludes that all-payer ratesetting is able to meet its multiple objectives of cost containment, reduction of the amount of cost shifting, improvement of access to the uninsured, and increased productivity. At the same time, all-payer ratesetting has not stifled the diffusion of competitive health care systems or new technology, and any impact on length of stay, admissions, and quality of care is small, if it exists at all. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4195134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1992 |
publisher | CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41951342014-11-04 All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out Anderson, Gerard F. Health Care Financ Rev Global Cost-Containment Strategies In the United States, when the cost-containment paradigm shifted from regulation to competition, all-payer hospital ratesetting went out of favor. After reviewing the published literature and supplementing the existing literature with more current information, the author concludes that all-payer ratesetting is able to meet its multiple objectives of cost containment, reduction of the amount of cost shifting, improvement of access to the uninsured, and increased productivity. At the same time, all-payer ratesetting has not stifled the diffusion of competitive health care systems or new technology, and any impact on length of stay, admissions, and quality of care is small, if it exists at all. CENTERS for MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES 1992-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4195134/ /pubmed/25371975 Text en |
spellingShingle | Global Cost-Containment Strategies Anderson, Gerard F. All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out |
title | All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out |
title_full | All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out |
title_fullStr | All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out |
title_full_unstemmed | All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out |
title_short | All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out |
title_sort | all-payer ratesetting: down but not out |
topic | Global Cost-Containment Strategies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25371975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersongerardf allpayerratesettingdownbutnotout |