Cargando…
Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale
Background: Batch effects in DNA methylation microarray experiments can lead to spurious results if not properly handled during the plating of samples. Methods: Two pilot studies examining the association of DNA methylation patterns across the genome with obesity in Samoan men were investigated for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00354 |
_version_ | 1782339300455612416 |
---|---|
author | Buhule, Olive D. Minster, Ryan L. Hawley, Nicola L. Medvedovic, Mario Sun, Guangyun Viali, Satupaitea Deka, Ranjan McGarvey, Stephen T. Weeks, Daniel E. |
author_facet | Buhule, Olive D. Minster, Ryan L. Hawley, Nicola L. Medvedovic, Mario Sun, Guangyun Viali, Satupaitea Deka, Ranjan McGarvey, Stephen T. Weeks, Daniel E. |
author_sort | Buhule, Olive D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Batch effects in DNA methylation microarray experiments can lead to spurious results if not properly handled during the plating of samples. Methods: Two pilot studies examining the association of DNA methylation patterns across the genome with obesity in Samoan men were investigated for chip- and row-specific batch effects. For each study, the DNA of 46 obese men and 46 lean men were assayed using Illumina's Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. In the first study (Sample One), samples from obese and lean subjects were examined on separate chips. In the second study (Sample Two), the samples were balanced on the chips by lean/obese status, age group, and census region. We used methylumi, watermelon, and limma R packages, as well as ComBat, to analyze the data. Principal component analysis and linear regression were, respectively, employed to identify the top principal components and to test for their association with the batches and lean/obese status. To identify differentially methylated positions (DMPs) between obese and lean males at each locus, we used a moderated t-test. Results: Chip effects were effectively removed from Sample Two but not Sample One. In addition, dramatic differences were observed between the two sets of DMP results. After “removing” batch effects with ComBat, Sample One had 94,191 probes differentially methylated at a q-value threshold of 0.05 while Sample Two had zero differentially methylated probes. The disparate results from Sample One and Sample Two likely arise due to the confounding of lean/obese status with chip and row batch effects. Conclusion: Even the best possible statistical adjustments for batch effects may not completely remove them. Proper study design is vital for guarding against spurious findings due to such effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4195366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41953662014-10-28 Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale Buhule, Olive D. Minster, Ryan L. Hawley, Nicola L. Medvedovic, Mario Sun, Guangyun Viali, Satupaitea Deka, Ranjan McGarvey, Stephen T. Weeks, Daniel E. Front Genet Genetics Background: Batch effects in DNA methylation microarray experiments can lead to spurious results if not properly handled during the plating of samples. Methods: Two pilot studies examining the association of DNA methylation patterns across the genome with obesity in Samoan men were investigated for chip- and row-specific batch effects. For each study, the DNA of 46 obese men and 46 lean men were assayed using Illumina's Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. In the first study (Sample One), samples from obese and lean subjects were examined on separate chips. In the second study (Sample Two), the samples were balanced on the chips by lean/obese status, age group, and census region. We used methylumi, watermelon, and limma R packages, as well as ComBat, to analyze the data. Principal component analysis and linear regression were, respectively, employed to identify the top principal components and to test for their association with the batches and lean/obese status. To identify differentially methylated positions (DMPs) between obese and lean males at each locus, we used a moderated t-test. Results: Chip effects were effectively removed from Sample Two but not Sample One. In addition, dramatic differences were observed between the two sets of DMP results. After “removing” batch effects with ComBat, Sample One had 94,191 probes differentially methylated at a q-value threshold of 0.05 while Sample Two had zero differentially methylated probes. The disparate results from Sample One and Sample Two likely arise due to the confounding of lean/obese status with chip and row batch effects. Conclusion: Even the best possible statistical adjustments for batch effects may not completely remove them. Proper study design is vital for guarding against spurious findings due to such effects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4195366/ /pubmed/25352862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00354 Text en Copyright © 2014 Buhule, Minster, Hawley, Medvedovic, Sun, Viali, Deka, McGarvey and Weeks. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Buhule, Olive D. Minster, Ryan L. Hawley, Nicola L. Medvedovic, Mario Sun, Guangyun Viali, Satupaitea Deka, Ranjan McGarvey, Stephen T. Weeks, Daniel E. Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale |
title | Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale |
title_full | Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale |
title_fullStr | Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale |
title_full_unstemmed | Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale |
title_short | Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale |
title_sort | stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450k methylation analysis: a cautionary tale |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buhuleolived stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT minsterryanl stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT hawleynicolal stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT medvedovicmario stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT sunguangyun stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT vialisatupaitea stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT dekaranjan stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT mcgarveystephent stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale AT weeksdaniele stratifiedrandomizationcontrolsbetterforbatcheffectsin450kmethylationanalysisacautionarytale |