Cargando…
The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
Clinical assessment of functional disability is an integral part of management in patients with low back pain (LBP). The range of spinal motion is one of LBP disability measure. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of spinal range of motion as a predictable measure of disability and...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.01.002 |
_version_ | 1782339316130775040 |
---|---|
author | Atya, Azza M. |
author_facet | Atya, Azza M. |
author_sort | Atya, Azza M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical assessment of functional disability is an integral part of management in patients with low back pain (LBP). The range of spinal motion is one of LBP disability measure. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of spinal range of motion as a predictable measure of disability and to analyze the intrarater reliability of back range of motion (BROM) instrument for measurement of active lumber spine range of motion. Forty men patients with chronic low back pain over 6 month’s duration were participated in the study. Their ages ranged from 20 to 40 years. Lumber range of motion was measured with BROM device and disability was evaluated by self reported Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation, multiple regression analysis models and ICC. Statistical analysis revealed that there was a highly significant moderate to good relation between forward trunk flexion and RMDQ score (rho = −0.59, p < 0.001). While there was a weak correlation between trunk extensions, lateral trunk flexion and trunk rotation with the RMDQ scores (p > 0.05). The main predictors of disability were forward and lateral trunk flexion. Furthermore, intrarater reliability for forward trunk flexion was good (ICC, 0.84), for extension was high (ICC, 0.91), for rotation was good (ICC range, 0.86–0.88), and for lateral flexion was good (ICC range, 0.81–0.82). It was suggested that spinal ROM do not appear to be a valid measure for prediction of the functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4195464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41954642015-02-14 The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain Atya, Azza M. J Adv Res Original Article Clinical assessment of functional disability is an integral part of management in patients with low back pain (LBP). The range of spinal motion is one of LBP disability measure. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of spinal range of motion as a predictable measure of disability and to analyze the intrarater reliability of back range of motion (BROM) instrument for measurement of active lumber spine range of motion. Forty men patients with chronic low back pain over 6 month’s duration were participated in the study. Their ages ranged from 20 to 40 years. Lumber range of motion was measured with BROM device and disability was evaluated by self reported Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation, multiple regression analysis models and ICC. Statistical analysis revealed that there was a highly significant moderate to good relation between forward trunk flexion and RMDQ score (rho = −0.59, p < 0.001). While there was a weak correlation between trunk extensions, lateral trunk flexion and trunk rotation with the RMDQ scores (p > 0.05). The main predictors of disability were forward and lateral trunk flexion. Furthermore, intrarater reliability for forward trunk flexion was good (ICC, 0.84), for extension was high (ICC, 0.91), for rotation was good (ICC range, 0.86–0.88), and for lateral flexion was good (ICC range, 0.81–0.82). It was suggested that spinal ROM do not appear to be a valid measure for prediction of the functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain. Elsevier 2013-01 2012-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4195464/ /pubmed/25685400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.01.002 Text en © 2012 Cairo University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Atya, Azza M. The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain |
title | The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain |
title_full | The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain |
title_fullStr | The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed | The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain |
title_short | The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain |
title_sort | validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.01.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atyaazzam thevalidityofspinalmobilityforpredictionoffunctionaldisabilityinmalepatientswithlowbackpain AT atyaazzam validityofspinalmobilityforpredictionoffunctionaldisabilityinmalepatientswithlowbackpain |