Cargando…

The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain

Clinical assessment of functional disability is an integral part of management in patients with low back pain (LBP). The range of spinal motion is one of LBP disability measure. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of spinal range of motion as a predictable measure of disability and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Atya, Azza M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.01.002
_version_ 1782339316130775040
author Atya, Azza M.
author_facet Atya, Azza M.
author_sort Atya, Azza M.
collection PubMed
description Clinical assessment of functional disability is an integral part of management in patients with low back pain (LBP). The range of spinal motion is one of LBP disability measure. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of spinal range of motion as a predictable measure of disability and to analyze the intrarater reliability of back range of motion (BROM) instrument for measurement of active lumber spine range of motion. Forty men patients with chronic low back pain over 6 month’s duration were participated in the study. Their ages ranged from 20 to 40 years. Lumber range of motion was measured with BROM device and disability was evaluated by self reported Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation, multiple regression analysis models and ICC. Statistical analysis revealed that there was a highly significant moderate to good relation between forward trunk flexion and RMDQ score (rho = −0.59, p < 0.001). While there was a weak correlation between trunk extensions, lateral trunk flexion and trunk rotation with the RMDQ scores (p > 0.05). The main predictors of disability were forward and lateral trunk flexion. Furthermore, intrarater reliability for forward trunk flexion was good (ICC, 0.84), for extension was high (ICC, 0.91), for rotation was good (ICC range, 0.86–0.88), and for lateral flexion was good (ICC range, 0.81–0.82). It was suggested that spinal ROM do not appear to be a valid measure for prediction of the functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4195464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41954642015-02-14 The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain Atya, Azza M. J Adv Res Original Article Clinical assessment of functional disability is an integral part of management in patients with low back pain (LBP). The range of spinal motion is one of LBP disability measure. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of spinal range of motion as a predictable measure of disability and to analyze the intrarater reliability of back range of motion (BROM) instrument for measurement of active lumber spine range of motion. Forty men patients with chronic low back pain over 6 month’s duration were participated in the study. Their ages ranged from 20 to 40 years. Lumber range of motion was measured with BROM device and disability was evaluated by self reported Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation, multiple regression analysis models and ICC. Statistical analysis revealed that there was a highly significant moderate to good relation between forward trunk flexion and RMDQ score (rho = −0.59, p < 0.001). While there was a weak correlation between trunk extensions, lateral trunk flexion and trunk rotation with the RMDQ scores (p > 0.05). The main predictors of disability were forward and lateral trunk flexion. Furthermore, intrarater reliability for forward trunk flexion was good (ICC, 0.84), for extension was high (ICC, 0.91), for rotation was good (ICC range, 0.86–0.88), and for lateral flexion was good (ICC range, 0.81–0.82). It was suggested that spinal ROM do not appear to be a valid measure for prediction of the functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain. Elsevier 2013-01 2012-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4195464/ /pubmed/25685400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.01.002 Text en © 2012 Cairo University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Atya, Azza M.
The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
title The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
title_full The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
title_fullStr The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
title_full_unstemmed The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
title_short The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
title_sort validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT atyaazzam thevalidityofspinalmobilityforpredictionoffunctionaldisabilityinmalepatientswithlowbackpain
AT atyaazzam validityofspinalmobilityforpredictionoffunctionaldisabilityinmalepatientswithlowbackpain