Mid-Term Outcome of Mechanical Pulmonary Valve Prostheses: The Importance of Anticoagulation

Introduction: Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) is being performed more commonly late after the correction of tetralogy of Fallot. Most valves are replaced with an allograft or xenograft, although reoperations are a common theme. Mechanical prostheses have a less favorable reputation due to the necessity of lifelong anticoagulation therapy and higher risk of thrombosis, but they are also less likely to require reoperation. There is a paucity of data on the use of prosthetic valves in the pulmonary position. We report the midterm outcomes of 38 cases of PVR with mechanical prostheses. Methods: One hundred twenty two patients who underwent PVR were studied. Thirty-eight patients, mean age 25 ± 8.4 years underwent PVR with mechanical prostheses based on the right ventricular function and the preferences of the patients and physicians. Median age of prosthesis was 1 year (range 3 months to 5 years). Results: Seven (18%) patients had malfunctioning pulmonary prostheses and two patients underwent redo PVR. Mean International Normalized Ratio (INR) in these seven patients was 2.1±0.8. Fibrinolytic therapy was tried and five of them responded to it well. There was no significant association between the severity of right ventricular dysfunction, patient’s age, prostheses valve size and age of the prosthesis in the patients with prosthesis malfunction. Conclusion: PVR with mechanical prostheses can be performed with promising midterm outcomes. Thrombosis on mechanical pulmonary valve prostheses remains a serious complication, but most prosthesis malfunction respond to fibrinolytic therapy, underscoring the need for adequate anticoagulation therapy.