Cargando…
Detection of Platelet-Monocyte Aggregates by the ADAM(® )Image Cytometer
Background: Inappropriate platelet activation is known to be associated with various thrombotic disorders. Platelet-monocyte aggregates (PMAs), whose formation is mediated by platelet surface P-selectin (CD62P), can be used as a reliable marker to detect platelet activation. Previous studies have ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317068 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.10008 |
Sumario: | Background: Inappropriate platelet activation is known to be associated with various thrombotic disorders. Platelet-monocyte aggregates (PMAs), whose formation is mediated by platelet surface P-selectin (CD62P), can be used as a reliable marker to detect platelet activation. Previous studies have generally detected PMAs through flow cytometry-based approaches. Recently, the ADAM(®) image cytometer (Nanoentek Inc., Seoul, Korea) was developed for image-based cellular analysis. In this study, we detected PMAs with the ADAM(®) cytometer, evaluated the reproducibility of the measurements made by the ADAM(®) cytometer, and compared the abilities of the ADAM(®) cytometer and a flow cytometric assay to detect PMAs. Methods: Whole blood samples were collected from patients. Within 5 minutes of collection, anticoagulated whole blood samples were fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde and 5% glyoxal. Nineteen clinical specimens were collected; each was analyzed three times with the ADAM(® )cytometer in order to assess the reproducibility of its measurements. To compare the ability of the ADAM(®) cytometer with that of a flow cytometer to detect PMAs, each cytometer was used for 23 clinical samples and the correlation of the measurements was determined. Results: The PMA measurements made by the ADAM(®) cytometer showed good reproducibility (CV < 10% for all specimens). Moreover, the PMA measurements made by the ADAM(®) cytometer exhibited a high correlation with those made by a flow cytometric assay (R = 0.944). Conclusions: The ADAM(®) cytometer is a suitable alternative method to the flow cytometry-based assays. Since the ADAM cytometer does not need specialized instrument knowledge or software proficiency (unlike flow cytometry), the ADAM(®) cytometer can be used as a rapid and reliable POCT device to measure platelet activation in peripheral blood. This, in turn, will provide valuable information regarding patient propensities to thrombotic diseases. |
---|