Cargando…

A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch

BACKGROUND: In-shoe foot orthoses improve conditions such as plantar heel pain (fasciitis), probably due to their ability to raise the medial longitudinal arch of the foot and lower the stress on the plantar tissues. Increasingly the arch-profile form of the in-shoe foot orthosis is being incorporat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escalona-Marfil, Carles, McPoil, Thomas G, Mellor, Rebecca, Vicenzino, Bill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0038-5
_version_ 1782339430427656192
author Escalona-Marfil, Carles
McPoil, Thomas G
Mellor, Rebecca
Vicenzino, Bill
author_facet Escalona-Marfil, Carles
McPoil, Thomas G
Mellor, Rebecca
Vicenzino, Bill
author_sort Escalona-Marfil, Carles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-shoe foot orthoses improve conditions such as plantar heel pain (fasciitis), probably due to their ability to raise the medial longitudinal arch of the foot and lower the stress on the plantar tissues. Increasingly the arch-profile form of the in-shoe foot orthosis is being incorporated into sandal footwear, providing an alternative footwear option for those who require an orthosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a sandal that incorporates the arch-profile of an in-shoe foot orthosis does indeed raise the medial longitudinal arch. METHODS: Three commercially available non-medical devices (contoured and flat sandal, prefabricated in-shoe orthosis) worn by healthy individuals were studied in two independent experiments, one using radiographic measurements in Australia (n = 11, 6 female, age 26.1 ± 4.3 yrs, BMI 22.0 ± 2.4 kg/m(2)) and the other utilising anthropometric measures in the USA (n = 10, 6 female, age 26.3 ± 3.8 yrs, BMI 23.5 ± 3.7 kg/m(2)). A barefoot condition was also measured. Dorsal arch height was measured in both experiments, as well as in subtalar neutral in the anthropometric experiment. One way repeated measures ANOVA with follow up Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons were used to test differences between the conditions (contoured and flat sandal, orthosis, barefoot). Mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardised mean differences (SMD) were also calculated. RESULTS: The contoured sandal significantly increased dorsal arch height compared to barefoot and flat sandal in both the anthropometric and radiographic experiments with SMD ranging from 0.95 (mean difference 5.1 mm (CI: 0.3, 1.6)) to 1.8 (4.3 mm (1.9, 6.6)). There were small differences between the contoured sandal and orthosis of 1.9 mm (0.6, 3.3) in the radiographic experiment and 1.2 mm (−0.4, 0.9) in the anthropometric experiment. The contoured sandal approximated the subtalar neutral position (0.4 mm (−0.5, 0.7)). CONCLUSIONS: Medial longitudinal arch height is elevated by contoured sandals and approximates subtalar joint neutral position of the foot and that achieved by an orthosis. Practitioners wanting to increase the medial longitudinal arch can do so with either an orthosis or a contoured sandal that includes the raised arch profile form of an orthosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4196133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41961332014-10-15 A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch Escalona-Marfil, Carles McPoil, Thomas G Mellor, Rebecca Vicenzino, Bill J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: In-shoe foot orthoses improve conditions such as plantar heel pain (fasciitis), probably due to their ability to raise the medial longitudinal arch of the foot and lower the stress on the plantar tissues. Increasingly the arch-profile form of the in-shoe foot orthosis is being incorporated into sandal footwear, providing an alternative footwear option for those who require an orthosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a sandal that incorporates the arch-profile of an in-shoe foot orthosis does indeed raise the medial longitudinal arch. METHODS: Three commercially available non-medical devices (contoured and flat sandal, prefabricated in-shoe orthosis) worn by healthy individuals were studied in two independent experiments, one using radiographic measurements in Australia (n = 11, 6 female, age 26.1 ± 4.3 yrs, BMI 22.0 ± 2.4 kg/m(2)) and the other utilising anthropometric measures in the USA (n = 10, 6 female, age 26.3 ± 3.8 yrs, BMI 23.5 ± 3.7 kg/m(2)). A barefoot condition was also measured. Dorsal arch height was measured in both experiments, as well as in subtalar neutral in the anthropometric experiment. One way repeated measures ANOVA with follow up Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons were used to test differences between the conditions (contoured and flat sandal, orthosis, barefoot). Mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardised mean differences (SMD) were also calculated. RESULTS: The contoured sandal significantly increased dorsal arch height compared to barefoot and flat sandal in both the anthropometric and radiographic experiments with SMD ranging from 0.95 (mean difference 5.1 mm (CI: 0.3, 1.6)) to 1.8 (4.3 mm (1.9, 6.6)). There were small differences between the contoured sandal and orthosis of 1.9 mm (0.6, 3.3) in the radiographic experiment and 1.2 mm (−0.4, 0.9) in the anthropometric experiment. The contoured sandal approximated the subtalar neutral position (0.4 mm (−0.5, 0.7)). CONCLUSIONS: Medial longitudinal arch height is elevated by contoured sandals and approximates subtalar joint neutral position of the foot and that achieved by an orthosis. Practitioners wanting to increase the medial longitudinal arch can do so with either an orthosis or a contoured sandal that includes the raised arch profile form of an orthosis. BioMed Central 2014-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4196133/ /pubmed/25317208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0038-5 Text en © Escalona-Marfil et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Escalona-Marfil, Carles
McPoil, Thomas G
Mellor, Rebecca
Vicenzino, Bill
A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch
title A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch
title_full A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch
title_fullStr A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch
title_full_unstemmed A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch
title_short A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch
title_sort radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0038-5
work_keys_str_mv AT escalonamarfilcarles aradiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch
AT mcpoilthomasg aradiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch
AT mellorrebecca aradiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch
AT vicenzinobill aradiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch
AT escalonamarfilcarles radiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch
AT mcpoilthomasg radiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch
AT mellorrebecca radiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch
AT vicenzinobill radiographicandanthropometricstudyoftheeffectofacontouredsandalandfootorthosisonsupportingthemediallongitudinalarch