Cargando…
Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants
Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-spec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korea Genome Organization
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317107 http://dx.doi.org/10.5808/GI.2014.12.3.87 |
_version_ | 1782339473311268864 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sung-Il Kim, Nam-Soo |
author_facet | Lee, Sung-Il Kim, Nam-Soo |
author_sort | Lee, Sung-Il |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-specific in plant taxonomy. Transposable element fractions in plant genomes are also variable, as low as ~3% in small genomes and as high as ~85% in large genomes, indicating that genome size is a linear function of transposable element content. Of the 2 classes of transposable elements, the dynamics of class 1 long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons is a major contributor to the 1C value differences among plants. The activity of LTR retrotransposons is under the control of epigenetic suppressing mechanisms. Also, genome-purging mechanisms have been adopted to counter-balance the genome size amplification. With a wealth of information on whole-genome sequences in plant genomes, it was revealed that several genome-purging mechanisms have been employed, depending on plant taxa. Two genera, Lilium and Fritillaria, are known to have large genomes in angiosperms. There were twice times of concerted genome size evolutions in the family Liliaceae during the divergence of the current genera in Liliaceae. In addition to the LTR retrotransposons, non-LTR retrotransposons and satellite DNAs contributed to the huge genomes in the two genera by possible failure of genome counter-balancing mechanisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4196380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Korea Genome Organization |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41963802014-10-14 Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants Lee, Sung-Il Kim, Nam-Soo Genomics Inform Review Article Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-specific in plant taxonomy. Transposable element fractions in plant genomes are also variable, as low as ~3% in small genomes and as high as ~85% in large genomes, indicating that genome size is a linear function of transposable element content. Of the 2 classes of transposable elements, the dynamics of class 1 long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons is a major contributor to the 1C value differences among plants. The activity of LTR retrotransposons is under the control of epigenetic suppressing mechanisms. Also, genome-purging mechanisms have been adopted to counter-balance the genome size amplification. With a wealth of information on whole-genome sequences in plant genomes, it was revealed that several genome-purging mechanisms have been employed, depending on plant taxa. Two genera, Lilium and Fritillaria, are known to have large genomes in angiosperms. There were twice times of concerted genome size evolutions in the family Liliaceae during the divergence of the current genera in Liliaceae. In addition to the LTR retrotransposons, non-LTR retrotransposons and satellite DNAs contributed to the huge genomes in the two genera by possible failure of genome counter-balancing mechanisms. Korea Genome Organization 2014-09 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4196380/ /pubmed/25317107 http://dx.doi.org/10.5808/GI.2014.12.3.87 Text en Copyright © 2014 by the Korea Genome Organization http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ It is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lee, Sung-Il Kim, Nam-Soo Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants |
title | Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants |
title_full | Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants |
title_fullStr | Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants |
title_full_unstemmed | Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants |
title_short | Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants |
title_sort | transposable elements and genome size variations in plants |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317107 http://dx.doi.org/10.5808/GI.2014.12.3.87 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesungil transposableelementsandgenomesizevariationsinplants AT kimnamsoo transposableelementsandgenomesizevariationsinplants |