Cargando…

Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE: Multiple segment 5 vein (V5) anastomoses are common and inevitable in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using modified right lobe (MRL) graft. Sacrifice of segment 4a vein (V4a) can simplify bench work and avoid graft congestion. But it could be harmful to some donors in previous si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Kwangho, Park, Youngmok, Moon, Kimyung, Ryu, Jeho, Chu, Chongwoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317413
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2014.87.4.185
_version_ 1782339474727895040
author Yang, Kwangho
Park, Youngmok
Moon, Kimyung
Ryu, Jeho
Chu, Chongwoo
author_facet Yang, Kwangho
Park, Youngmok
Moon, Kimyung
Ryu, Jeho
Chu, Chongwoo
author_sort Yang, Kwangho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Multiple segment 5 vein (V5) anastomoses are common and inevitable in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using modified right lobe (MRL) graft. Sacrifice of segment 4a vein (V4a) can simplify bench work and avoid graft congestion. But it could be harmful to some donors in previous simulation studies. This study aimed to evaluate donor safety in LDLT using caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe (CMPRL) graft. METHODS: LDLT using MRL grafts were performed on 33 patients (group A) and LDLT using CMPRL grafts were performed on 37 patients (group B). Group B was classified into 2 subgroups by venous drainage pattern of segment 4: V4a dominant drainage group (group B1) and the other group (group B2). Parameters compared between group A donors and group B donors included operation time, bench work time, number and diameter of V5, remnant liver volume and postoperative course. Those were also investigated in group B1 compared with group B2. And, we reviewed postoperative course of the recipients in groups A and B. RESULTS: Operation time and bench work time in group B were significantly shorter. There were no significant differences in most postoperative parameters between groups B1 and B2. As a result of recipient, V5 patency rates after LDLT were significantly higher in group B. CONCLUSION: LDLT using CMPRL graft is a safe procedure for living donors. Donors with any type of V4 could be proper candidates for CMPRL graft if remnant liver volume is greater than 30% with minimal fatty change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4196432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41964322014-10-14 Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation Yang, Kwangho Park, Youngmok Moon, Kimyung Ryu, Jeho Chu, Chongwoo Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Multiple segment 5 vein (V5) anastomoses are common and inevitable in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using modified right lobe (MRL) graft. Sacrifice of segment 4a vein (V4a) can simplify bench work and avoid graft congestion. But it could be harmful to some donors in previous simulation studies. This study aimed to evaluate donor safety in LDLT using caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe (CMPRL) graft. METHODS: LDLT using MRL grafts were performed on 33 patients (group A) and LDLT using CMPRL grafts were performed on 37 patients (group B). Group B was classified into 2 subgroups by venous drainage pattern of segment 4: V4a dominant drainage group (group B1) and the other group (group B2). Parameters compared between group A donors and group B donors included operation time, bench work time, number and diameter of V5, remnant liver volume and postoperative course. Those were also investigated in group B1 compared with group B2. And, we reviewed postoperative course of the recipients in groups A and B. RESULTS: Operation time and bench work time in group B were significantly shorter. There were no significant differences in most postoperative parameters between groups B1 and B2. As a result of recipient, V5 patency rates after LDLT were significantly higher in group B. CONCLUSION: LDLT using CMPRL graft is a safe procedure for living donors. Donors with any type of V4 could be proper candidates for CMPRL graft if remnant liver volume is greater than 30% with minimal fatty change. The Korean Surgical Society 2014-10 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4196432/ /pubmed/25317413 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2014.87.4.185 Text en Copyright © 2014, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Kwangho
Park, Youngmok
Moon, Kimyung
Ryu, Jeho
Chu, Chongwoo
Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation
title Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation
title_full Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation
title_fullStr Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation
title_short Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation
title_sort caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317413
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2014.87.4.185
work_keys_str_mv AT yangkwangho caudalmiddlehepaticveintrunkpreservedrightlobegraftinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT parkyoungmok caudalmiddlehepaticveintrunkpreservedrightlobegraftinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT moonkimyung caudalmiddlehepaticveintrunkpreservedrightlobegraftinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT ryujeho caudalmiddlehepaticveintrunkpreservedrightlobegraftinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT chuchongwoo caudalmiddlehepaticveintrunkpreservedrightlobegraftinlivingdonorlivertransplantation