Cargando…

Perception of string quartet synchronization

Timing variation in small group musical performance results from intentional, expressive, and unintentional, error components in individual player timing. These timing fluctuations produce variability in between-player note asynchrony and require timing adjustments to keep the ensemble together. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wing, Alan M., Endo, Satoshi, Yates, Tim, Bradbury, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01115
_version_ 1782339483658616832
author Wing, Alan M.
Endo, Satoshi
Yates, Tim
Bradbury, Adrian
author_facet Wing, Alan M.
Endo, Satoshi
Yates, Tim
Bradbury, Adrian
author_sort Wing, Alan M.
collection PubMed
description Timing variation in small group musical performance results from intentional, expressive, and unintentional, error components in individual player timing. These timing fluctuations produce variability in between-player note asynchrony and require timing adjustments to keep the ensemble together. The size of the adjustments relative to the asynchrony (correction gain) affects the amount and nature of asynchrony variability. We present new listening tests to estimate thresholds for perception of between-player asynchrony variability and to determine whether listeners use differences in the nature of the variability, as well as in its magnitude, to judge asynchrony. In two experiments, computer-simulated ensemble performances of a 48-note excerpt from Haydn Op. 74 No. 1 were generated. Between-player note asynchrony was systematically manipulated in terms of level of within-player timing variability (Experiment 1) and correction gain (Experiment 2). On each trial, participants listened to two samples, one (“target”) with more between-player asynchrony variability than the other (“test”), and reported which was “less together.” In both experiments, the test sample correction gain was fixed at the statistically optimal value of 0.25 and the within-player timing variability was minimal (zero except for random variability in the initial note). In Experiment 1 the target correction gain was fixed at 0.25 and the timing variability was adjusted over trials by a staircase algorithm designed to converge on the level of asynchrony variability giving 75% correct identification. In Experiment 2 the timing variability in the target was set at half that in Experiment 1 and the correction gain was varied to converge on 75% correct identification. Our results show that the between-player asynchrony variability giving 75% correct identification in Experiment 2 was significantly lower than in Experiment 1. This finding indicates that people are sensitive to both the degree of variance and the micro-structure of the time-series of the asynchronies caused by differences in correction gain when judging lack of togetherness in quartet performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4196478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41964782014-10-28 Perception of string quartet synchronization Wing, Alan M. Endo, Satoshi Yates, Tim Bradbury, Adrian Front Psychol Psychology Timing variation in small group musical performance results from intentional, expressive, and unintentional, error components in individual player timing. These timing fluctuations produce variability in between-player note asynchrony and require timing adjustments to keep the ensemble together. The size of the adjustments relative to the asynchrony (correction gain) affects the amount and nature of asynchrony variability. We present new listening tests to estimate thresholds for perception of between-player asynchrony variability and to determine whether listeners use differences in the nature of the variability, as well as in its magnitude, to judge asynchrony. In two experiments, computer-simulated ensemble performances of a 48-note excerpt from Haydn Op. 74 No. 1 were generated. Between-player note asynchrony was systematically manipulated in terms of level of within-player timing variability (Experiment 1) and correction gain (Experiment 2). On each trial, participants listened to two samples, one (“target”) with more between-player asynchrony variability than the other (“test”), and reported which was “less together.” In both experiments, the test sample correction gain was fixed at the statistically optimal value of 0.25 and the within-player timing variability was minimal (zero except for random variability in the initial note). In Experiment 1 the target correction gain was fixed at 0.25 and the timing variability was adjusted over trials by a staircase algorithm designed to converge on the level of asynchrony variability giving 75% correct identification. In Experiment 2 the timing variability in the target was set at half that in Experiment 1 and the correction gain was varied to converge on 75% correct identification. Our results show that the between-player asynchrony variability giving 75% correct identification in Experiment 2 was significantly lower than in Experiment 1. This finding indicates that people are sensitive to both the degree of variance and the micro-structure of the time-series of the asynchronies caused by differences in correction gain when judging lack of togetherness in quartet performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4196478/ /pubmed/25352813 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01115 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wing, Endo, Yates and Bradbury. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wing, Alan M.
Endo, Satoshi
Yates, Tim
Bradbury, Adrian
Perception of string quartet synchronization
title Perception of string quartet synchronization
title_full Perception of string quartet synchronization
title_fullStr Perception of string quartet synchronization
title_full_unstemmed Perception of string quartet synchronization
title_short Perception of string quartet synchronization
title_sort perception of string quartet synchronization
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01115
work_keys_str_mv AT wingalanm perceptionofstringquartetsynchronization
AT endosatoshi perceptionofstringquartetsynchronization
AT yatestim perceptionofstringquartetsynchronization
AT bradburyadrian perceptionofstringquartetsynchronization