Cargando…
Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
BACKGROUND: Any hypothesis in longitudinal studies may be affected by attrition and poor response rates. The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing study (MRC CFAS) is a population based longitudinal study in five centres with identical methodology in England and Wales each recruiting approximately 2,500...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15113437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-12 |
_version_ | 1782121445154881536 |
---|---|
author | Matthews, Fiona E Chatfield, Mark Freeman, Carol McCracken, Cherie Brayne, Carol CFAS, MRC |
author_facet | Matthews, Fiona E Chatfield, Mark Freeman, Carol McCracken, Cherie Brayne, Carol CFAS, MRC |
author_sort | Matthews, Fiona E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Any hypothesis in longitudinal studies may be affected by attrition and poor response rates. The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing study (MRC CFAS) is a population based longitudinal study in five centres with identical methodology in England and Wales each recruiting approximately 2,500 individuals. This paper aims to identify potential biases in the two-year follow-up interviews. METHODS: Initial non-response: Those not in the baseline interviews were compared in terms of mortality to those who were in the baseline interviews at the time of the second wave interviews (1993–1996). Longitudinal attrition: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine baseline differences between individuals who took part in the two-year longitudinal wave compared with those who did not. RESULTS: Initial non-response: Individuals who moved away after sampling but before baseline interview were 1.8 times more likely to die by two years (95% Confidence interval(CI) 1.3–2.4) compared to respondents, after adjusting for age. The refusers had a slightly higher, but similar mortality pattern to responders (Odds ratio 1.2, 95%CI 1.1–1.4). Longitudinal attrition: Predictors for drop out due to death were being older, male, having impaired activities of daily living, poor self-perceived health, poor cognitive ability and smoking. Similarly individuals who refused were more likely to have poor cognitive ability, but had less years of full-time education and were more often living in their own home though less likely to be living alone. There was a higher refusal rate in the rural centres. Individuals who moved away or were uncontactable were more likely to be single, smokers, demented or depressed and were less likely to have moved if in warden-controlled accommodation at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal estimation of factors mentioned above could be biased, particularly cognitive ability and estimates of movements from own home to residential homes. However, these differences could also affect other investigations, particularly the estimates of incidence and longitudinal effects of health and psychiatric diseases, where the factors shown here to be associated with attrition are risk factors for the diseases. All longitudinal studies should investigate attrition and this may help with aspects of design and with the analysis of specific hypotheses. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-419705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4197052004-05-30 Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation Matthews, Fiona E Chatfield, Mark Freeman, Carol McCracken, Cherie Brayne, Carol CFAS, MRC BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Any hypothesis in longitudinal studies may be affected by attrition and poor response rates. The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing study (MRC CFAS) is a population based longitudinal study in five centres with identical methodology in England and Wales each recruiting approximately 2,500 individuals. This paper aims to identify potential biases in the two-year follow-up interviews. METHODS: Initial non-response: Those not in the baseline interviews were compared in terms of mortality to those who were in the baseline interviews at the time of the second wave interviews (1993–1996). Longitudinal attrition: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine baseline differences between individuals who took part in the two-year longitudinal wave compared with those who did not. RESULTS: Initial non-response: Individuals who moved away after sampling but before baseline interview were 1.8 times more likely to die by two years (95% Confidence interval(CI) 1.3–2.4) compared to respondents, after adjusting for age. The refusers had a slightly higher, but similar mortality pattern to responders (Odds ratio 1.2, 95%CI 1.1–1.4). Longitudinal attrition: Predictors for drop out due to death were being older, male, having impaired activities of daily living, poor self-perceived health, poor cognitive ability and smoking. Similarly individuals who refused were more likely to have poor cognitive ability, but had less years of full-time education and were more often living in their own home though less likely to be living alone. There was a higher refusal rate in the rural centres. Individuals who moved away or were uncontactable were more likely to be single, smokers, demented or depressed and were less likely to have moved if in warden-controlled accommodation at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal estimation of factors mentioned above could be biased, particularly cognitive ability and estimates of movements from own home to residential homes. However, these differences could also affect other investigations, particularly the estimates of incidence and longitudinal effects of health and psychiatric diseases, where the factors shown here to be associated with attrition are risk factors for the diseases. All longitudinal studies should investigate attrition and this may help with aspects of design and with the analysis of specific hypotheses. BioMed Central 2004-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC419705/ /pubmed/15113437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-12 Text en Copyright © 2004 Matthews et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Matthews, Fiona E Chatfield, Mark Freeman, Carol McCracken, Cherie Brayne, Carol CFAS, MRC Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation |
title | Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation |
title_full | Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation |
title_fullStr | Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation |
title_short | Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation |
title_sort | attrition and bias in the mrc cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15113437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthewsfionae attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation AT chatfieldmark attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation AT freemancarol attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation AT mccrackencherie attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation AT braynecarol attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation AT cfasmrc attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation |