Cargando…

Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation

BACKGROUND: Any hypothesis in longitudinal studies may be affected by attrition and poor response rates. The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing study (MRC CFAS) is a population based longitudinal study in five centres with identical methodology in England and Wales each recruiting approximately 2,500...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Fiona E, Chatfield, Mark, Freeman, Carol, McCracken, Cherie, Brayne, Carol, CFAS, MRC
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15113437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-12
_version_ 1782121445154881536
author Matthews, Fiona E
Chatfield, Mark
Freeman, Carol
McCracken, Cherie
Brayne, Carol
CFAS, MRC
author_facet Matthews, Fiona E
Chatfield, Mark
Freeman, Carol
McCracken, Cherie
Brayne, Carol
CFAS, MRC
author_sort Matthews, Fiona E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Any hypothesis in longitudinal studies may be affected by attrition and poor response rates. The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing study (MRC CFAS) is a population based longitudinal study in five centres with identical methodology in England and Wales each recruiting approximately 2,500 individuals. This paper aims to identify potential biases in the two-year follow-up interviews. METHODS: Initial non-response: Those not in the baseline interviews were compared in terms of mortality to those who were in the baseline interviews at the time of the second wave interviews (1993–1996). Longitudinal attrition: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine baseline differences between individuals who took part in the two-year longitudinal wave compared with those who did not. RESULTS: Initial non-response: Individuals who moved away after sampling but before baseline interview were 1.8 times more likely to die by two years (95% Confidence interval(CI) 1.3–2.4) compared to respondents, after adjusting for age. The refusers had a slightly higher, but similar mortality pattern to responders (Odds ratio 1.2, 95%CI 1.1–1.4). Longitudinal attrition: Predictors for drop out due to death were being older, male, having impaired activities of daily living, poor self-perceived health, poor cognitive ability and smoking. Similarly individuals who refused were more likely to have poor cognitive ability, but had less years of full-time education and were more often living in their own home though less likely to be living alone. There was a higher refusal rate in the rural centres. Individuals who moved away or were uncontactable were more likely to be single, smokers, demented or depressed and were less likely to have moved if in warden-controlled accommodation at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal estimation of factors mentioned above could be biased, particularly cognitive ability and estimates of movements from own home to residential homes. However, these differences could also affect other investigations, particularly the estimates of incidence and longitudinal effects of health and psychiatric diseases, where the factors shown here to be associated with attrition are risk factors for the diseases. All longitudinal studies should investigate attrition and this may help with aspects of design and with the analysis of specific hypotheses.
format Text
id pubmed-419705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4197052004-05-30 Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation Matthews, Fiona E Chatfield, Mark Freeman, Carol McCracken, Cherie Brayne, Carol CFAS, MRC BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Any hypothesis in longitudinal studies may be affected by attrition and poor response rates. The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing study (MRC CFAS) is a population based longitudinal study in five centres with identical methodology in England and Wales each recruiting approximately 2,500 individuals. This paper aims to identify potential biases in the two-year follow-up interviews. METHODS: Initial non-response: Those not in the baseline interviews were compared in terms of mortality to those who were in the baseline interviews at the time of the second wave interviews (1993–1996). Longitudinal attrition: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine baseline differences between individuals who took part in the two-year longitudinal wave compared with those who did not. RESULTS: Initial non-response: Individuals who moved away after sampling but before baseline interview were 1.8 times more likely to die by two years (95% Confidence interval(CI) 1.3–2.4) compared to respondents, after adjusting for age. The refusers had a slightly higher, but similar mortality pattern to responders (Odds ratio 1.2, 95%CI 1.1–1.4). Longitudinal attrition: Predictors for drop out due to death were being older, male, having impaired activities of daily living, poor self-perceived health, poor cognitive ability and smoking. Similarly individuals who refused were more likely to have poor cognitive ability, but had less years of full-time education and were more often living in their own home though less likely to be living alone. There was a higher refusal rate in the rural centres. Individuals who moved away or were uncontactable were more likely to be single, smokers, demented or depressed and were less likely to have moved if in warden-controlled accommodation at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal estimation of factors mentioned above could be biased, particularly cognitive ability and estimates of movements from own home to residential homes. However, these differences could also affect other investigations, particularly the estimates of incidence and longitudinal effects of health and psychiatric diseases, where the factors shown here to be associated with attrition are risk factors for the diseases. All longitudinal studies should investigate attrition and this may help with aspects of design and with the analysis of specific hypotheses. BioMed Central 2004-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC419705/ /pubmed/15113437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-12 Text en Copyright © 2004 Matthews et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matthews, Fiona E
Chatfield, Mark
Freeman, Carol
McCracken, Cherie
Brayne, Carol
CFAS, MRC
Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
title Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
title_full Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
title_fullStr Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
title_full_unstemmed Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
title_short Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
title_sort attrition and bias in the mrc cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15113437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-12
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewsfionae attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation
AT chatfieldmark attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation
AT freemancarol attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation
AT mccrackencherie attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation
AT braynecarol attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation
AT cfasmrc attritionandbiasinthemrccognitivefunctionandageingstudyanepidemiologicalinvestigation