Cargando…
Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90-yttrium is a local therapy for unresectable liver malignancies. Non-targeted 90-yttrium diversion via a patent hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is seen as risk for periprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-595 |
_version_ | 1782339576465981440 |
---|---|
author | Schelhorn, Juliane Ertle, Judith Schlaak, Joerg F Mueller, Stefan Bockisch, Andreas Schlosser, Thomas Lauenstein, Thomas |
author_facet | Schelhorn, Juliane Ertle, Judith Schlaak, Joerg F Mueller, Stefan Bockisch, Andreas Schlosser, Thomas Lauenstein, Thomas |
author_sort | Schelhorn, Juliane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90-yttrium is a local therapy for unresectable liver malignancies. Non-targeted 90-yttrium diversion via a patent hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is seen as risk for periprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of a patent HFA on SIRT. 606 patients with SIRT between 2006 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. SIRT preparation was performed by digital subtraction angiography including (99m)Tc-HSAM administration and subsequent SPECT/CT. Patients with an angiographically patent HFA were analyzed for procedural consequences and complications. 19 of 606 patients (3%) with an angiographically patent HFA were identified. Only 11 of these 19 patients received 90-yttrium in the hepatic vessel bed containing the HFA. Initial coil embolization of the HFA succeeded only in three of 11 patients. Out of the eight remaining patients four had no abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation. The other four patients presented with an abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation, for those a reattempt of HFA embolization was performed or ice packs were administered on the abdominal wall during SIRT. In summary, all patients tolerated SIRT well. A patent HFA should not be considered a SIRT contraindication. In patients with abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation HFA embolization or ice pack administration seems to prevent complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4197194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41971942014-10-20 Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery Schelhorn, Juliane Ertle, Judith Schlaak, Joerg F Mueller, Stefan Bockisch, Andreas Schlosser, Thomas Lauenstein, Thomas Springerplus Research Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90-yttrium is a local therapy for unresectable liver malignancies. Non-targeted 90-yttrium diversion via a patent hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is seen as risk for periprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of a patent HFA on SIRT. 606 patients with SIRT between 2006 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. SIRT preparation was performed by digital subtraction angiography including (99m)Tc-HSAM administration and subsequent SPECT/CT. Patients with an angiographically patent HFA were analyzed for procedural consequences and complications. 19 of 606 patients (3%) with an angiographically patent HFA were identified. Only 11 of these 19 patients received 90-yttrium in the hepatic vessel bed containing the HFA. Initial coil embolization of the HFA succeeded only in three of 11 patients. Out of the eight remaining patients four had no abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation. The other four patients presented with an abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation, for those a reattempt of HFA embolization was performed or ice packs were administered on the abdominal wall during SIRT. In summary, all patients tolerated SIRT well. A patent HFA should not be considered a SIRT contraindication. In patients with abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation HFA embolization or ice pack administration seems to prevent complications. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4197194/ /pubmed/25332891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-595 Text en © Schelhorn et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Schelhorn, Juliane Ertle, Judith Schlaak, Joerg F Mueller, Stefan Bockisch, Andreas Schlosser, Thomas Lauenstein, Thomas Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery |
title | Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery |
title_full | Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery |
title_fullStr | Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery |
title_short | Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery |
title_sort | selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schelhornjuliane selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery AT ertlejudith selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery AT schlaakjoergf selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery AT muellerstefan selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery AT bockischandreas selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery AT schlosserthomas selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery AT lauensteinthomas selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery |