Cargando…

Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90-yttrium is a local therapy for unresectable liver malignancies. Non-targeted 90-yttrium diversion via a patent hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is seen as risk for periprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schelhorn, Juliane, Ertle, Judith, Schlaak, Joerg F, Mueller, Stefan, Bockisch, Andreas, Schlosser, Thomas, Lauenstein, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-595
_version_ 1782339576465981440
author Schelhorn, Juliane
Ertle, Judith
Schlaak, Joerg F
Mueller, Stefan
Bockisch, Andreas
Schlosser, Thomas
Lauenstein, Thomas
author_facet Schelhorn, Juliane
Ertle, Judith
Schlaak, Joerg F
Mueller, Stefan
Bockisch, Andreas
Schlosser, Thomas
Lauenstein, Thomas
author_sort Schelhorn, Juliane
collection PubMed
description Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90-yttrium is a local therapy for unresectable liver malignancies. Non-targeted 90-yttrium diversion via a patent hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is seen as risk for periprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of a patent HFA on SIRT. 606 patients with SIRT between 2006 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. SIRT preparation was performed by digital subtraction angiography including (99m)Tc-HSAM administration and subsequent SPECT/CT. Patients with an angiographically patent HFA were analyzed for procedural consequences and complications. 19 of 606 patients (3%) with an angiographically patent HFA were identified. Only 11 of these 19 patients received 90-yttrium in the hepatic vessel bed containing the HFA. Initial coil embolization of the HFA succeeded only in three of 11 patients. Out of the eight remaining patients four had no abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation. The other four patients presented with an abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation, for those a reattempt of HFA embolization was performed or ice packs were administered on the abdominal wall during SIRT. In summary, all patients tolerated SIRT well. A patent HFA should not be considered a SIRT contraindication. In patients with abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation HFA embolization or ice pack administration seems to prevent complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4197194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41971942014-10-20 Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery Schelhorn, Juliane Ertle, Judith Schlaak, Joerg F Mueller, Stefan Bockisch, Andreas Schlosser, Thomas Lauenstein, Thomas Springerplus Research Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90-yttrium is a local therapy for unresectable liver malignancies. Non-targeted 90-yttrium diversion via a patent hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is seen as risk for periprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of a patent HFA on SIRT. 606 patients with SIRT between 2006 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. SIRT preparation was performed by digital subtraction angiography including (99m)Tc-HSAM administration and subsequent SPECT/CT. Patients with an angiographically patent HFA were analyzed for procedural consequences and complications. 19 of 606 patients (3%) with an angiographically patent HFA were identified. Only 11 of these 19 patients received 90-yttrium in the hepatic vessel bed containing the HFA. Initial coil embolization of the HFA succeeded only in three of 11 patients. Out of the eight remaining patients four had no abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation. The other four patients presented with an abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation, for those a reattempt of HFA embolization was performed or ice packs were administered on the abdominal wall during SIRT. In summary, all patients tolerated SIRT well. A patent HFA should not be considered a SIRT contraindication. In patients with abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation HFA embolization or ice pack administration seems to prevent complications. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4197194/ /pubmed/25332891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-595 Text en © Schelhorn et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Schelhorn, Juliane
Ertle, Judith
Schlaak, Joerg F
Mueller, Stefan
Bockisch, Andreas
Schlosser, Thomas
Lauenstein, Thomas
Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
title Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
title_full Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
title_fullStr Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
title_full_unstemmed Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
title_short Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
title_sort selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-595
work_keys_str_mv AT schelhornjuliane selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery
AT ertlejudith selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery
AT schlaakjoergf selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery
AT muellerstefan selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery
AT bockischandreas selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery
AT schlosserthomas selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery
AT lauensteinthomas selectiveinternalradiationtherapyofhepatictumorsproceduralimplicationsofapatenthepaticfalciformartery