Cargando…
A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol
BACKGROUND: This protocol builds on the development of a) a framework that identified the various supports (i.e. positions, activities, interventions) that a healthcare organisation or health system can implement for evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) and b) a qualitative study that showed the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25294109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0146-4 |
_version_ | 1782339580225126400 |
---|---|
author | Ouimet, Mathieu Lavis, John N Léon, Grégory Ellen, Moriah E Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Grimshaw, Jeremy M Gagnon, Marie-Pierre |
author_facet | Ouimet, Mathieu Lavis, John N Léon, Grégory Ellen, Moriah E Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Grimshaw, Jeremy M Gagnon, Marie-Pierre |
author_sort | Ouimet, Mathieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This protocol builds on the development of a) a framework that identified the various supports (i.e. positions, activities, interventions) that a healthcare organisation or health system can implement for evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) and b) a qualitative study that showed the current mix of supports that some Canadian healthcare organisations have in place and the ones that are perceived to facilitate the use of research evidence in decision-making. Based on these findings, we developed a web survey to collect cross-sectional data about the specific supports that regional health authorities and hospitals in two Canadian provinces (Ontario and Quebec) have in place to facilitate EIDM. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the methods for a cross-sectional web survey among 32 regional health authorities and 253 hospitals in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario (Canada) to collect data on the current mix of organisational supports that these organisations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making. The data will be obtained through a two-step survey design: a 10-min survey among CEOs to identify key units and individuals in regard to our objectives (step 1) and a 20-min survey among managers of the key units identified in step 1 to collect information about the activities performed by their unit regarding the acquisition, assessment, adaptation and/or dissemination of research evidence in decision-making (step 2). The study will target three types of informants: CEOs, library/documentation centre managers and all other key managers whose unit is involved in the acquisition, assessment, adaptation/packaging and/or dissemination of research evidence in decision-making. We developed an innovative data collection system to increase the likelihood that only the best-informed respondent available answers each survey question. The reporting of the results will be done using descriptive statistics of supports by organisation type and by province. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to collect and report large-scale cross-sectional data on the current mix of supports health system organisations in the two most populous Canadian provinces have in place for evidence-informed decision-making. The study will also provide useful information to researchers on how to collect organisation-level data with reduced risk of self-reporting bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0146-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4197221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41972212014-10-16 A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol Ouimet, Mathieu Lavis, John N Léon, Grégory Ellen, Moriah E Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Grimshaw, Jeremy M Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: This protocol builds on the development of a) a framework that identified the various supports (i.e. positions, activities, interventions) that a healthcare organisation or health system can implement for evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) and b) a qualitative study that showed the current mix of supports that some Canadian healthcare organisations have in place and the ones that are perceived to facilitate the use of research evidence in decision-making. Based on these findings, we developed a web survey to collect cross-sectional data about the specific supports that regional health authorities and hospitals in two Canadian provinces (Ontario and Quebec) have in place to facilitate EIDM. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the methods for a cross-sectional web survey among 32 regional health authorities and 253 hospitals in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario (Canada) to collect data on the current mix of organisational supports that these organisations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making. The data will be obtained through a two-step survey design: a 10-min survey among CEOs to identify key units and individuals in regard to our objectives (step 1) and a 20-min survey among managers of the key units identified in step 1 to collect information about the activities performed by their unit regarding the acquisition, assessment, adaptation and/or dissemination of research evidence in decision-making (step 2). The study will target three types of informants: CEOs, library/documentation centre managers and all other key managers whose unit is involved in the acquisition, assessment, adaptation/packaging and/or dissemination of research evidence in decision-making. We developed an innovative data collection system to increase the likelihood that only the best-informed respondent available answers each survey question. The reporting of the results will be done using descriptive statistics of supports by organisation type and by province. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to collect and report large-scale cross-sectional data on the current mix of supports health system organisations in the two most populous Canadian provinces have in place for evidence-informed decision-making. The study will also provide useful information to researchers on how to collect organisation-level data with reduced risk of self-reporting bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0146-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4197221/ /pubmed/25294109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0146-4 Text en © Ouimet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ouimet, Mathieu Lavis, John N Léon, Grégory Ellen, Moriah E Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Grimshaw, Jeremy M Gagnon, Marie-Pierre A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol |
title | A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol |
title_full | A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol |
title_short | A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol |
title_sort | cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25294109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0146-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouimetmathieu acrosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT lavisjohnn acrosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT leongregory acrosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT ellenmoriahe acrosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT bedardpierreolivier acrosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT grimshawjeremym acrosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT gagnonmariepierre acrosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT ouimetmathieu crosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT lavisjohnn crosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT leongregory crosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT ellenmoriahe crosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT bedardpierreolivier crosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT grimshawjeremym crosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol AT gagnonmariepierre crosssectionalsurveyofsupportsforevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginhealthcareorganisationsaresearchprotocol |