Cargando…
Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and high surgical risk. Hemodynamic performance after TAVI is superior, but the impact of reverse remodeling on clinical improvement is contr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-41 |
_version_ | 1782339594184818688 |
---|---|
author | Gavina, Cristina Gonçalves, Alexandra Almeria, Carlos Hernandez, Rosana Leite-Moreira, Adelino Rocha-Gonçalves, Francisco Zamorano, José |
author_facet | Gavina, Cristina Gonçalves, Alexandra Almeria, Carlos Hernandez, Rosana Leite-Moreira, Adelino Rocha-Gonçalves, Francisco Zamorano, José |
author_sort | Gavina, Cristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and high surgical risk. Hemodynamic performance after TAVI is superior, but the impact of reverse remodeling on clinical improvement is controversial. We aim to address the differences in hemodynamic changes between SAVR and TAVI, and its correlation with LV remodeling and clinical improvement at 6 months follow-up. METHODS: Forty-two patients treated by TAVI were compared with 45 SAVR patients with a stented bioprosthesis. Clinical, 2D and 3D echocardiographic data were prospectively obtained before and six months after intervention. RESULTS: Patients had similar distribution for sex, body surface area and AS severity. TAVI patients were older, more symptomatic and had more comorbidities. They also had higher LV filling pressures, larger 3D indexed left atrium volume, but similar 3D indexed LV mass. At 6 months, TAVI patients had greater clinical improvement and higher effective orifice area index (EAOI), but only SAVR patients already had a significant decrease in 3D indexed LV mass and diastolic volume. In univariate analysis older age, NYHA class ≥ III, increase in EAOI and TAVI were related with functional class improvement. After multivariate analysis only NYHA class ≥ III (OR 8.81, CI:2.13-36.52; p = 0.003) and an increase in EAOI ≥ 105% (OR 3.87, CI:1.02-14.70; p = 0.04) were predictors of clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months, functional class improvement was greater after TAVI. Higher initial NYHA class and an increase in EAOI ≥ 105% were independently associated with functional enhancement. It is debatable if left ventricular remodeling is determinant for functional class improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1476-7120-12-41) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4197280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41972802014-10-16 Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis Gavina, Cristina Gonçalves, Alexandra Almeria, Carlos Hernandez, Rosana Leite-Moreira, Adelino Rocha-Gonçalves, Francisco Zamorano, José Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and high surgical risk. Hemodynamic performance after TAVI is superior, but the impact of reverse remodeling on clinical improvement is controversial. We aim to address the differences in hemodynamic changes between SAVR and TAVI, and its correlation with LV remodeling and clinical improvement at 6 months follow-up. METHODS: Forty-two patients treated by TAVI were compared with 45 SAVR patients with a stented bioprosthesis. Clinical, 2D and 3D echocardiographic data were prospectively obtained before and six months after intervention. RESULTS: Patients had similar distribution for sex, body surface area and AS severity. TAVI patients were older, more symptomatic and had more comorbidities. They also had higher LV filling pressures, larger 3D indexed left atrium volume, but similar 3D indexed LV mass. At 6 months, TAVI patients had greater clinical improvement and higher effective orifice area index (EAOI), but only SAVR patients already had a significant decrease in 3D indexed LV mass and diastolic volume. In univariate analysis older age, NYHA class ≥ III, increase in EAOI and TAVI were related with functional class improvement. After multivariate analysis only NYHA class ≥ III (OR 8.81, CI:2.13-36.52; p = 0.003) and an increase in EAOI ≥ 105% (OR 3.87, CI:1.02-14.70; p = 0.04) were predictors of clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months, functional class improvement was greater after TAVI. Higher initial NYHA class and an increase in EAOI ≥ 105% were independently associated with functional enhancement. It is debatable if left ventricular remodeling is determinant for functional class improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1476-7120-12-41) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4197280/ /pubmed/25283715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-41 Text en © Gavina et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gavina, Cristina Gonçalves, Alexandra Almeria, Carlos Hernandez, Rosana Leite-Moreira, Adelino Rocha-Gonçalves, Francisco Zamorano, José Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis |
title | Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis |
title_full | Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis |
title_fullStr | Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis |
title_short | Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis |
title_sort | determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-41 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gavinacristina determinantsofclinicalimprovementaftersurgicalreplacementortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationforisolatedaorticstenosis AT goncalvesalexandra determinantsofclinicalimprovementaftersurgicalreplacementortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationforisolatedaorticstenosis AT almeriacarlos determinantsofclinicalimprovementaftersurgicalreplacementortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationforisolatedaorticstenosis AT hernandezrosana determinantsofclinicalimprovementaftersurgicalreplacementortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationforisolatedaorticstenosis AT leitemoreiraadelino determinantsofclinicalimprovementaftersurgicalreplacementortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationforisolatedaorticstenosis AT rochagoncalvesfrancisco determinantsofclinicalimprovementaftersurgicalreplacementortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationforisolatedaorticstenosis AT zamoranojose determinantsofclinicalimprovementaftersurgicalreplacementortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationforisolatedaorticstenosis |