Cargando…

Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff

BACKGROUND: A web-based tool was developed and piloted by being made available to healthcare staff in Wales from September 2012 to March 2013. This evaluation included two primary outcome measures: general health and mental well-being, and six secondary outcome measures: sickness absence, alcohol us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Woerden, Hugo C, Ashton, Kathryn, Garlick, Christopher, Hurley, Andrew, Cooper, Andrew, Willson, Alan, Henry, Ray, Kiparoglou, Vasiliki, Potter, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25320639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-7-44
_version_ 1782339599928918016
author van Woerden, Hugo C
Ashton, Kathryn
Garlick, Christopher
Hurley, Andrew
Cooper, Andrew
Willson, Alan
Henry, Ray
Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
Potter, Christopher
author_facet van Woerden, Hugo C
Ashton, Kathryn
Garlick, Christopher
Hurley, Andrew
Cooper, Andrew
Willson, Alan
Henry, Ray
Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
Potter, Christopher
author_sort van Woerden, Hugo C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A web-based tool was developed and piloted by being made available to healthcare staff in Wales from September 2012 to March 2013. This evaluation included two primary outcome measures: general health and mental well-being, and six secondary outcome measures: sickness absence, alcohol use, healthy eating, smoking, physical activity and maintaining a healthy BMI. The aim was to assess the feasibility of a web-based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff. METHODS: Healthcare staff joined via a website, chose two of five challenges, and recorded their health behaviours using an online tool on a regular basis. Evaluation was undertaken by comparing baseline and follow up questionnaires. RESULTS: 1708 individuals explored the programme’s website, of whom 1320 selected two lifestyle challenges to address. Of these 346 individuals (26.2%; 346/1320) completed the end of project evaluation questions for the main outcome and provided the basis of the evaluation. Comparing pre:post data among respondents who engaged with the programme as a whole, self-reported general health status improved in 35.3% (n = 122, p = 0.001); mental health status improved in 33% (n = 110, p = 0.02); alcohol consumption score (AUDIT-C classification) fell in 27.2% (n = 71, p = 0.001); reported fruit and vegetable consumption (7 day recall) increased (p = 0.001); average time spent on vigorous exercise increased from 40.6 minutes a week to 67.6 minutes a week (p = 0.001); and 41 individuals noted a positive change to their BMI classification category (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combining interactive web-based tools as part of a multi-media programme is feasible, increases health behaviours and generates interest among a proportion of the healthcare workforce. Further work is required to improve maintenance of engagement over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4197304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41973042014-10-16 Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff van Woerden, Hugo C Ashton, Kathryn Garlick, Christopher Hurley, Andrew Cooper, Andrew Willson, Alan Henry, Ray Kiparoglou, Vasiliki Potter, Christopher Int Arch Med Original Research BACKGROUND: A web-based tool was developed and piloted by being made available to healthcare staff in Wales from September 2012 to March 2013. This evaluation included two primary outcome measures: general health and mental well-being, and six secondary outcome measures: sickness absence, alcohol use, healthy eating, smoking, physical activity and maintaining a healthy BMI. The aim was to assess the feasibility of a web-based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff. METHODS: Healthcare staff joined via a website, chose two of five challenges, and recorded their health behaviours using an online tool on a regular basis. Evaluation was undertaken by comparing baseline and follow up questionnaires. RESULTS: 1708 individuals explored the programme’s website, of whom 1320 selected two lifestyle challenges to address. Of these 346 individuals (26.2%; 346/1320) completed the end of project evaluation questions for the main outcome and provided the basis of the evaluation. Comparing pre:post data among respondents who engaged with the programme as a whole, self-reported general health status improved in 35.3% (n = 122, p = 0.001); mental health status improved in 33% (n = 110, p = 0.02); alcohol consumption score (AUDIT-C classification) fell in 27.2% (n = 71, p = 0.001); reported fruit and vegetable consumption (7 day recall) increased (p = 0.001); average time spent on vigorous exercise increased from 40.6 minutes a week to 67.6 minutes a week (p = 0.001); and 41 individuals noted a positive change to their BMI classification category (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combining interactive web-based tools as part of a multi-media programme is feasible, increases health behaviours and generates interest among a proportion of the healthcare workforce. Further work is required to improve maintenance of engagement over time. BioMed Central 2014-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4197304/ /pubmed/25320639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-7-44 Text en © van Woerden et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
van Woerden, Hugo C
Ashton, Kathryn
Garlick, Christopher
Hurley, Andrew
Cooper, Andrew
Willson, Alan
Henry, Ray
Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
Potter, Christopher
Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff
title Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff
title_full Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff
title_fullStr Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff
title_short Evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff
title_sort evaluation of a web based tool to improve health behaviours in healthcare staff
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25320639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-7-44
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwoerdenhugoc evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT ashtonkathryn evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT garlickchristopher evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT hurleyandrew evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT cooperandrew evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT willsonalan evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT henryray evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT kiparoglouvasiliki evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff
AT potterchristopher evaluationofawebbasedtooltoimprovehealthbehavioursinhealthcarestaff