Cargando…

Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification

BACKGROUND: Hybrid external fixation (HEF) is an emerging technique for fracture stabilization in veterinary orthopedics, but its use has been reported in few papers in the veterinary literature. The linear and circular elements that form hybrid fixators can be connected in a very high number of com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiménez-Heras, María, Rovesti, Gian Luca, Nocco, Gianluca, Barilli, Massimo, Bogoni, Paolo, Salas-Herreros, Emilio, Armato, Matteo, Collivignarelli, Francesco, Vegni, Federico, Rodríguez-Quiros, Jesus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0189-4
_version_ 1782339600167993344
author Jiménez-Heras, María
Rovesti, Gian Luca
Nocco, Gianluca
Barilli, Massimo
Bogoni, Paolo
Salas-Herreros, Emilio
Armato, Matteo
Collivignarelli, Francesco
Vegni, Federico
Rodríguez-Quiros, Jesus
author_facet Jiménez-Heras, María
Rovesti, Gian Luca
Nocco, Gianluca
Barilli, Massimo
Bogoni, Paolo
Salas-Herreros, Emilio
Armato, Matteo
Collivignarelli, Francesco
Vegni, Federico
Rodríguez-Quiros, Jesus
author_sort Jiménez-Heras, María
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hybrid external fixation (HEF) is an emerging technique for fracture stabilization in veterinary orthopedics, but its use has been reported in few papers in the veterinary literature. The linear and circular elements that form hybrid fixators can be connected in a very high number of combinations, and for this reason just referring to HEF without any classification is often misleading about the actual frame structure. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate fracture stabilization by HEF in 58 client-owned dogs and 8 cats, and to extend the already existing classification for hybrid constructs to include all frame configurations used in this study and potentially applicable in clinical settings. Animal signalment, fracture classification, surgical procedure and frame configuration were recorded. Complications, radiographic, functional and cosmetic results were evaluated at the time of fixator removal. RESULTS: Sixty-eight fractures in 58 dogs and eight cats were evaluated. Two dogs had bilateral fractures. Fifty-one percent were radio-ulna, 34% tibial, 9% humeral, 3% femoral and 3% scapular fractures. One ring combined with one or two linear elements was the most widely employed configuration in this case series. Radiographic results at the time of frame removal were excellent in 59% of the cases, good in 38% and fair in 3%, while functional and cosmetic results were excellent in 69% of the cases, good in 27% and fair in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: HEF is a useful option for fracture treatment in dogs and cats, particularly for peri and juxta-articular fractures. It can be applied with a minimally invasive approach, allows adjustments during the postoperative period and is a versatile system because of the large variety of combinations that can fit with the specific fracture features. The classification used enables to determine the number of linear and circular elements used in the frame.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4197305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41973052014-10-16 Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification Jiménez-Heras, María Rovesti, Gian Luca Nocco, Gianluca Barilli, Massimo Bogoni, Paolo Salas-Herreros, Emilio Armato, Matteo Collivignarelli, Francesco Vegni, Federico Rodríguez-Quiros, Jesus BMC Vet Res Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Hybrid external fixation (HEF) is an emerging technique for fracture stabilization in veterinary orthopedics, but its use has been reported in few papers in the veterinary literature. The linear and circular elements that form hybrid fixators can be connected in a very high number of combinations, and for this reason just referring to HEF without any classification is often misleading about the actual frame structure. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate fracture stabilization by HEF in 58 client-owned dogs and 8 cats, and to extend the already existing classification for hybrid constructs to include all frame configurations used in this study and potentially applicable in clinical settings. Animal signalment, fracture classification, surgical procedure and frame configuration were recorded. Complications, radiographic, functional and cosmetic results were evaluated at the time of fixator removal. RESULTS: Sixty-eight fractures in 58 dogs and eight cats were evaluated. Two dogs had bilateral fractures. Fifty-one percent were radio-ulna, 34% tibial, 9% humeral, 3% femoral and 3% scapular fractures. One ring combined with one or two linear elements was the most widely employed configuration in this case series. Radiographic results at the time of frame removal were excellent in 59% of the cases, good in 38% and fair in 3%, while functional and cosmetic results were excellent in 69% of the cases, good in 27% and fair in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: HEF is a useful option for fracture treatment in dogs and cats, particularly for peri and juxta-articular fractures. It can be applied with a minimally invasive approach, allows adjustments during the postoperative period and is a versatile system because of the large variety of combinations that can fit with the specific fracture features. The classification used enables to determine the number of linear and circular elements used in the frame. BioMed Central 2014-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4197305/ /pubmed/25238972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0189-4 Text en © Jiménez-Heras et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Jiménez-Heras, María
Rovesti, Gian Luca
Nocco, Gianluca
Barilli, Massimo
Bogoni, Paolo
Salas-Herreros, Emilio
Armato, Matteo
Collivignarelli, Francesco
Vegni, Federico
Rodríguez-Quiros, Jesus
Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification
title Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification
title_full Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification
title_fullStr Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification
title_short Evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification
title_sort evaluation of sixty-eight cases of fracture stabilisation by external hybrid fixation and a proposal for hybrid construct classification
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0189-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezherasmaria evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT rovestigianluca evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT noccogianluca evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT barillimassimo evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT bogonipaolo evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT salasherrerosemilio evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT armatomatteo evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT collivignarellifrancesco evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT vegnifederico evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification
AT rodriguezquirosjesus evaluationofsixtyeightcasesoffracturestabilisationbyexternalhybridfixationandaproposalforhybridconstructclassification