Cargando…

Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach?

Aims were to review results of the five psychiatric studies on Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) published during 2007-2013, and to compare FACT with Resource-group Assertive Community Treatment (RACT) which specifically focuses on empowerment and rehabilitation of clients in the stable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordén, Tommy, Norlander, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25320634
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901410010087
_version_ 1782339641089720320
author Nordén, Tommy
Norlander, Torsten
author_facet Nordén, Tommy
Norlander, Torsten
author_sort Nordén, Tommy
collection PubMed
description Aims were to review results of the five psychiatric studies on Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) published during 2007-2013, and to compare FACT with Resource-group Assertive Community Treatment (RACT) which specifically focuses on empowerment and rehabilitation of clients in the stable phase. During 2007 articles appeared in scientific journals arguing in favor of the need for the development of the treatment method Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). A particularly notable article was one that featured a Dutch version of ACT, namely FACT. The initiative received great sympathy given that clinical practice and research showed that both American and British versions of ACT were in need of new impulses to be able to maintain an optimal level of care. Seven years have passed since the Dutch model was international presented and five empirical studies about FACT have been published and therefore a first critical examination of FACT was conducted. The review indicated that the five empirical studies failed to show that FACT involves improvement of the clients in terms of symptoms, functioning, or well-being. The conclusions were that at present there is no evidence for FACT and that RACT with its small, flexible ACT teams, where the client him/herself is included and decides on the treatment goals, might be able to provide new impulses and a new vitality to the treatment mode of an assertive community treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4197527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41975272014-10-15 Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach? Nordén, Tommy Norlander, Torsten Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Article Aims were to review results of the five psychiatric studies on Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) published during 2007-2013, and to compare FACT with Resource-group Assertive Community Treatment (RACT) which specifically focuses on empowerment and rehabilitation of clients in the stable phase. During 2007 articles appeared in scientific journals arguing in favor of the need for the development of the treatment method Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). A particularly notable article was one that featured a Dutch version of ACT, namely FACT. The initiative received great sympathy given that clinical practice and research showed that both American and British versions of ACT were in need of new impulses to be able to maintain an optimal level of care. Seven years have passed since the Dutch model was international presented and five empirical studies about FACT have been published and therefore a first critical examination of FACT was conducted. The review indicated that the five empirical studies failed to show that FACT involves improvement of the clients in terms of symptoms, functioning, or well-being. The conclusions were that at present there is no evidence for FACT and that RACT with its small, flexible ACT teams, where the client him/herself is included and decides on the treatment goals, might be able to provide new impulses and a new vitality to the treatment mode of an assertive community treatment. Bentham Open 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4197527/ /pubmed/25320634 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901410010087 Text en © Nordén and Norlander; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Nordén, Tommy
Norlander, Torsten
Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach?
title Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach?
title_full Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach?
title_fullStr Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach?
title_full_unstemmed Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach?
title_short Absence of Positive Results for Flexible Assertive Community Treatment. What is the next Approach?
title_sort absence of positive results for flexible assertive community treatment. what is the next approach?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25320634
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901410010087
work_keys_str_mv AT nordentommy absenceofpositiveresultsforflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentwhatisthenextapproach
AT norlandertorsten absenceofpositiveresultsforflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentwhatisthenextapproach